Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
BMJ Open. 2023 May 17;13(5):e060232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060232.
For large, integrated healthcare delivery systems, coordinating patient care across delivery systems with providers external to the system presents challenges. We explored the domains and requirements for care coordination by professionals across healthcare systems and developed an agenda for research, practice and policy.
The modified Delphi approach convened a 2-day stakeholder panel with moderated virtual discussions, preceded and followed by online surveys.
The work addresses care coordination across healthcare systems. We introduced common care scenarios and differentiated recommendations for a large (main) healthcare organisation and external healthcare professionals that contribute additional care.
The panel composition included health service providers, decision makers, patients and care community, and researchers. Discussions were informed by a rapid review of tested approaches to fostering collaboration, facilitating care coordination and improving communication across healthcare systems.
The study planned to formulate a research agenda, implications for practice and recommendations for policy.
For research recommendations, we found consensus for developing measures of shared care, exploring healthcare professionals' needs in different care scenarios and evaluating patient experiences. Agreed practice recommendations included educating external professionals about issues specific to the patients in the main healthcare system, educating professionals within the main healthcare system about the roles and responsibilities of all involved parties, and helping patients better understand the pros and cons of within-system and out-of-system care. Policy recommendations included supporting time for professionals with high overlap in patients to engage regularly and sustaining support for care coordination for high-need patients.
Recommendations from the stakeholder panel created an agenda to foster further research, practice and policy innovations in cross-system care coordination.
对于大型综合医疗服务系统来说,协调系统内外的医疗服务提供者之间的患者护理存在挑战。我们探讨了医疗系统内专业人员进行护理协调的领域和要求,并制定了研究、实践和政策议程。
采用改良版德尔菲法,召集了为期两天的利益相关者小组会议,会议前和会议后都进行了在线调查。
这项工作涉及医疗系统间的护理协调。我们引入了常见的护理场景,并针对大型(主要)医疗保健组织和提供额外护理的外部医疗专业人员提出了不同的建议。
小组成员包括卫生服务提供者、决策者、患者和护理社区以及研究人员。讨论的依据是对促进协作、促进医疗系统间护理协调和改善沟通的经过测试的方法的快速审查。
该研究计划制定研究议程、对实践的影响和政策建议。
对于研究建议,我们达成了共识,即制定共同护理的衡量标准,探索不同护理场景下医疗专业人员的需求,并评估患者的体验。一致的实践建议包括向主要医疗系统外部的专业人员教育与主要医疗系统中患者特定的问题,向主要医疗系统内的专业人员教育所有相关方的角色和责任,以及帮助患者更好地理解系统内和系统外护理的优缺点。政策建议包括支持与患者重叠度高的专业人员定期进行沟通的时间,并为高需求患者的护理协调提供持续支持。
利益相关者小组的建议制定了一个议程,以促进跨系统护理协调的进一步研究、实践和政策创新。