Suppr超能文献

评估一项针对澳大利亚全科医生过度申请病理检查的审核和反馈干预措施的效果:一项基于事实的群组随机对照试验方案。

Evaluating an audit and feedback intervention for reducing overuse of pathology test requesting by Australian general practitioners: protocol for a factorial cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 May 17;13(5):e072248. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072248.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Consistent evidence shows pathology services are overused worldwide and that about one-third of testing is unnecessary. Audit and feedback (AF) is effective for improving care but few trials evaluating AF to reduce pathology test requesting in primary care have been conducted. The aim of this trial is to estimate the effectiveness of AF for reducing requests for commonly overused pathology test combinations by high-requesting Australian general practitioners (GPs) compared with no intervention control. A secondary aim is to evaluate which forms of AF are most effective.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a factorial cluster randomised trial conducted in Australian general practice. It uses routinely collected Medicare Benefits Schedule data to identify the study population, apply eligibility criteria, generate the interventions and analyse outcomes. On 12 May 2022, all eligible GPs were simultaneously randomised to either no intervention control or to one of eight intervention groups. GPs allocated to an intervention group received individualised AF on their rate of requesting of pathology test combinations compared with their GP peers. Three separate elements of the AF intervention will be evaluated when outcome data become available on 11 August 2023: (1) invitation to participate in continuing professional development-accredited education on appropriate pathology requesting, (2) provision of cost information on pathology test combinations and (3) format of feedback. The primary outcome is the overall rate of requesting of any of the displayed combinations of pathology tests of GPs over 6 months following intervention delivery. With 3371 clusters, assuming no interaction and similar effects for each intervention, we anticipate over 95% power to detect a difference of 4.4 requests in the mean rate of pathology test combination requests between the control and intervention groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was received from the Bond University Human Research Ethics Committee (#JH03507; approved 30 November 2021). The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. Reporting will adhere to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12622000566730.

摘要

简介

一致的证据表明,全球范围内病理服务过度使用,约三分之一的检测是不必要的。审核和反馈(AF)对于改善医疗保健是有效的,但很少有试验评估 AF 以减少初级保健中病理检测的请求。本试验的目的是评估 AF 对减少高请求的澳大利亚全科医生(GP)过度使用的常见病理检测组合的请求的有效性,与无干预对照相比。次要目的是评估哪种形式的 AF 最有效。

方法和分析

这是一项在澳大利亚普通实践中进行的析因聚类随机试验。它使用常规收集的医疗保险福利计划数据来确定研究人群,应用资格标准,生成干预措施并分析结果。2022 年 5 月 12 日,所有符合条件的全科医生同时被随机分配到无干预对照组或 8 个干预组之一。分配到干预组的全科医生将根据其与同行相比的病理检测组合请求率接受个性化的 AF。当 2023 年 8 月 11 日获得结果数据时,将评估 AF 干预的三个单独元素:(1)邀请参加关于适当病理请求的持续专业发展认证教育,(2)提供病理检测组合的成本信息,(3)反馈格式。主要结果是干预后 6 个月内,所有 GP 请求任何显示的病理检测组合的总体比率。在 3371 个聚类中,假设没有相互作用并且每个干预的效果相似,我们预计有超过 95%的效力来检测控制组和干预组之间病理检测组合请求的平均速率差异 4.4 次。

伦理和传播

邦德大学人类研究伦理委员会(#JH03507;2021 年 11 月 30 日批准)已批准该研究的伦理批准。该研究的结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在会议上发表。报告将遵守临床试验的统一报告标准。

试验注册号

ACTRN12622000566730。

相似文献

7

本文引用的文献

5
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.审核与反馈:对专业实践和医疗结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验