• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本经静脉心脏植入式电子装置感染的导线拔除术的地域差异 - 使用国家数据库公开数据的描述性研究。

Regional Disparities in Transvenous Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Japan - A Descriptive Study Using the National Database Open Data.

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health.

Department of Nursing Care, Sendai Kousei Hospital.

出版信息

Circ J. 2023 Jun 23;87(7):1000-1006. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0103. Epub 2023 May 16.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0103
PMID:37197942
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because the penetration of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection has not been investigated in Japan, we conducted a population-based, retrospective, descriptive study to evaluate regional disparities in the use of TLE for CIED infection and the potential undertreatment of CIED infection using a nationwide insurance claims database.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who underwent CIED implantation or generator exchange and TLE between April 2018 and March 2020 were identified. Moreover, the penetration ratio of TLE for CIED infection in each prefecture was estimated. CIED implantation and TLE were most prevalent in the age categories of 80-89 years (40.3%) and 80-89 years (36.9%), respectively. There was no correlation between the number of CIED implantations and that of TLE (rho=-0.087, 95% confidence interval -0.374 to 0.211, P=0.56). The median penetration ratio was 0.00 (interquartile range 0.00-1.29). Of the 47 prefectures, 6, comprising Okinawa, Miyagi, Okayama, Fukuoka, Tokyo, and Osaka, showed a penetration ratio ≥2.00.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study data indicated great regional disparities in the penetration of TLE and potential undertreatment of CIED infection in Japan. Additional measures are needed to address these issues.

摘要

背景

由于日本尚未对经静脉心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)感染的经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)的普及率进行调查,因此我们开展了一项基于人群的回顾性描述性研究,使用全国性的保险理赔数据库来评估日本各地 TLE 治疗 CIED 感染的使用率差异以及 CIED 感染治疗不足的潜在情况。

方法和结果

我们确定了在 2018 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月期间接受 CIED 植入或更换以及 TLE 的患者。此外,我们还估计了每个县 TLE 治疗 CIED 感染的普及率。80-89 岁年龄组的 CIED 植入术(40.3%)和 80-89 岁年龄组的 TLE(36.9%)最为常见。CIED 植入术和 TLE 的数量之间没有相关性(rho=-0.087,95%置信区间-0.374 至 0.211,P=0.56)。中位数普及率为 0.00(四分位间距 0.00-1.29)。在 47 个县中,6 个县(冲绳县、宫城县、冈山县、福冈县、东京都和大阪府)的普及率≥2.00。

结论

我们的研究数据表明,日本 TLE 的普及率和 CIED 感染治疗不足的情况存在显著的地区差异。需要采取额外的措施来解决这些问题。

相似文献

1
Regional Disparities in Transvenous Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Japan - A Descriptive Study Using the National Database Open Data.日本经静脉心脏植入式电子装置感染的导线拔除术的地域差异 - 使用国家数据库公开数据的描述性研究。
Circ J. 2023 Jun 23;87(7):1000-1006. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0103. Epub 2023 May 16.
2
Clinical Impact of the Incision of the Capsule Floor During Generator Replacement on Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection Risk: A Single-Center Experience.发生器更换时切开囊袋底部对心脏植入式电子设备感染风险的临床影响:单中心经验
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jul;36(7):1472-1477. doi: 10.1111/jce.16695. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
3
Multicentric Experience With the Use of Short 13Fr Mechanical Rotating Dilator Sheath for Transvenous Lead Extraction.使用13Fr短机械旋转扩张器鞘进行经静脉导线拔除的多中心经验
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Apr;48(4):436-442. doi: 10.1111/pace.15146. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
4
Safety of transvenous lead extraction according to centre volume: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据中心规模评估经静脉导线拔除术的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2014 Oct;16(10):1496-507. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu137. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
5
Barriers and Enablers to Routine Clinical Implementation of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Remote Monitoring in Australia Among Cardiologists, Cardiac Physiologists, Nurses, and Patients: Interview Study.澳大利亚心脏病学家、心脏生理学家、护士和患者对心脏植入式电子设备远程监测进行常规临床应用的障碍与促进因素:访谈研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Jul 18;9:e67758. doi: 10.2196/67758.
6
Transvenous Lead Extraction of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Reimplant Strategy and Outcomes in a Single-Center Experience.心脏植入式电子设备经静脉导线拔除术:单中心经验中的再植入策略与结果
Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Sep;18(3):389-394. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.3.389.
7
Cardiac implantable electronic device carriers undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty: real-world insights.接受经导管三尖瓣环成形术的心脏植入式电子设备携带者:真实世界的见解
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Mar 10. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02616-5.
8
Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation for cardiac rhythm management device insertion.心脏节律管理设备植入时的间断抗凝与持续抗凝
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 28;1(1):CD013816. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013816.pub2.
9
The effect of an antibacterial envelope on cardiac implantable device-related infection - A real-world analysis from a tertiary center.抗菌包膜对心脏植入式设备相关感染的影响——来自三级中心的真实世界分析。
Cardiol J. 2025;32(3):301-307. doi: 10.5603/cj.100458. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
10
Complications from prophylactic replacement of cardiac implantable electronic device generators in response to United States Food and Drug Administration recall: A systematic review and meta-analysis.因美国食品药品监督管理局召回而进行的心脏植入式电子设备发生器预防性更换的并发症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):1558-64. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 3.