Suppr超能文献

[单一医学中心超声心动图诊断肺动脉起源左冠状动脉异常的漏诊或误诊分析]

[Analysis on missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis of anomalous origin of left coronary artery from pulmonary artery by echocardiography from one single medical center].

作者信息

Lin S, He L, Ji L, Peng Y, Liu K, Lyu Q, Wang J, Li Y M, Zhang L, Xie M X, Yang Y L

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Medical Imaging, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China.

Department of Ultrasound, Hubei No.3 People's Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan 430030, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2023 May 24;51(5):481-489. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20220712-00541.

Abstract

To analyze the reasons of missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis on anomalous origin of left coronary artery from pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) by echocardiography. This is a retrospective study. Patients with ALCAPA who underwent surgical treatment in Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from August 2008 to December 2021 were included. According to the results of preoperative echocardiography and surgical diagnosis, the patients were divided into confirmed group or missed diagnosis/misdiagnosis group. The results of preoperative echocardiography were collected, and the specific echocardiographic signs were analyzed. According to the experience of the doctors, the echocardiographic signs were divided into four types, namely clear displayed, vague/doubtful displayed, no display and no notice, and the display rate of each sign was calculated (display rate=number of clearly displayed cases/total number of cases×100%). By referring the surgical data, we analyzed and recorded the pathological anatomy and pathophysiological characteristics of the patients, and the rate of missed diagnosis/misdiagnosis of echocardiography in patients with different characteristics was compared. A total of 21 patients were enrolled, including 11 males, aged 1.8 (0.8, 12.3) years (range 1 month to 47 years). Except for one patient with anomalous origin of left anterior descending artery, the others were all originated from the main left coronary artery (LCA). There were 13 cases of ALCAPA in infant and children, and 8 cases of adult ALCAPA. There were 15 cases in the confirmed group (diagnostic accuracy was 71.4% (15/21)), and 6 cases in the missed diagnosis/misdiagnosis group (three cases were misdiagnosed as primary endocardial fibroelastosis, two cases were misdiagnosed as coronary-pulmonary artery fistula; and one case was missed diagnosis). The working years of the physicians in the confirmed group were longer than those in the missed diagnosis/misdiagnosed group ((12.8±5.6) years vs. (8.3±4.7) years, =0.045). In infants with ALCAPA, the detection rate of LCA-pulmonary shunt (8/10 vs. 0, =0.035) and coronary collateral circulation (7/10 vs. 0, =0.042) in confirmed group was higher than that in missed diagnosis/misdiagnosed group. In adult ALCAPA patients, the detection rate of LCA-pulmonary artery shunt was higher in confirmed group than that in missed diagnosis/misdiagnosed group (4/5 vs. 0, =0.021). The missed diagnosis/misdiagnosis rate of adult type was higher than that of infant type (3/8 vs. 3/13, =0.410). The rate of missed diagnosis/misdiagnosis was higher in patients with abnormal origin of branches than that of abnormal origin of main trunk (1/1 vs. 5/21, =0.028). The rate of missed diagnosis/misdiagnosis in patients with LCA running between the main and pulmonary arteries was higher than that distant from the main pulmonary artery septum (4/7 vs. 2/14, =0.064). The rate of missed diagnosis/misdiagnosis in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension was higher than that in patients without severe pulmonary hypertension (2/3 vs. 4/18, =0.184). The reasons with an echocardiography missed diagnosis/misdiagnosis rate of≥50% included that (1) the proximal segment of LCA ran between the main and pulmonary arteries; (2) abnormal opening of LCA at the right posterior part of the pulmonary artery; (3) abnormal origin of LCA branches; (4) complicated with severe pulmonary hypertension. Echocardiography physicians' knowledge of ALCAPA and diagnostic vigilance are critical to the accuracy of diagnosis. Attention should be paid to the pediatric cases with no obvious precipitating factors of left ventricular enlargement, regardless of whether the left ventricular function is normal or not, the origin of coronary artery should be routinely explored.

摘要

分析超声心动图对左冠状动脉起源于肺动脉(ALCAPA)漏诊或误诊的原因。这是一项回顾性研究。纳入2008年8月至2021年12月在华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院接受手术治疗的ALCAPA患者。根据术前超声心动图结果和手术诊断,将患者分为确诊组或漏诊/误诊组。收集术前超声心动图结果,分析具体的超声心动图征象。根据医生经验,将超声心动图征象分为四类,即清晰显示、模糊/可疑显示、未显示和未注意到,并计算各征象的显示率(显示率=清晰显示病例数/病例总数×100%)。通过查阅手术资料,分析并记录患者的病理解剖和病理生理特征,比较不同特征患者超声心动图的漏诊/误诊率。共纳入21例患者,其中男性11例,年龄1.8(0.8,12.3)岁(范围1个月至47岁)。除1例左前降支起源异常外,其余均起源于左冠状动脉主干(LCA)。婴幼儿期ALCAPA 13例,成人ALCAPA 8例。确诊组15例(诊断准确率为71.4%(15/21)),漏诊/误诊组6例(3例误诊为原发性心内膜弹力纤维增生症,2例误诊为冠状-肺动脉瘘;1例漏诊)。确诊组医生的工作年限长于漏诊/误诊组((12.8±5.6)年 vs.(8.3±4.7)年,P=0.045)。婴幼儿ALCAPA患者中,确诊组左冠状动脉-肺动脉分流(8/10 vs. 0,P=0.035)和冠状动脉侧支循环(7/10 vs. 0,P=0.042)的检出率高于漏诊/误诊组。成人ALCAPA患者中,确诊组左冠状动脉-肺动脉分流的检出率高于漏诊/误诊组(4/5 vs. 0,P=0.021)。成人型的漏诊/误诊率高于婴幼儿型(3/8 vs. 3/13,P=0.410)。分支起源异常患者的漏诊/误诊率高于主干起源异常患者(1/1 vs. 5/21,P=0.028)。左冠状动脉走行于主动脉和肺动脉之间的患者漏诊/误诊率高于远离主肺动脉间隔的患者(4/7 vs. 2/14,P=0.064)。重度肺动脉高压患者的漏诊/误诊率高于无重度肺动脉高压患者(2/3 vs. 4/18,P=0.184)。超声心动图漏诊/误诊率≥50%的原因包括:(1)左冠状动脉近端走行于主动脉和肺动脉之间;(2)左冠状动脉在肺动脉右后部开口异常;(3)左冠状动脉分支起源异常;(4)合并重度肺动脉高压。超声心动图医生对ALCAPA的认识和诊断警惕性对诊断准确性至关重要。对于无明显左心室扩大诱发因素的儿科病例,无论左心室功能是否正常,均应常规探查冠状动脉起源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验