Suppr超能文献

药剂师主导的住院延伸服务中的药物审查导致了减药。

Pharmacist-led medication review in a residential in-reach service leads to deprescribing.

机构信息

Department of Home, Acute and Community, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ageing. 2023 Dec;42(4):675-682. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13215. Epub 2023 May 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of a pharmacist-led medication review on deprescribing medications in a Residential In-Reach (RIR) service which provides acute care substitution to residential aged care residents.

METHODS

A pre-post observational study was conducted. Patient characteristics and admission and discharge medications were collected over two 3-month phases before (prephase) and after (postphase) the introduction of a pharmacist who performed a comprehensive medication review and provided deprescribing recommendations. The Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP) version 2 was used to identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). The Drug Burden Index (DBI) was used to measure cumulative anticholinergic and sedative medication burden. Outcome of deprescribing was measured by the reduction in the number of PIMs, DBI scores and proportion of polypharmacy from admission to discharge.

RESULTS

The prephase included 59 patients (mean age 87.3 years, 63% female), and the postphase included 88 patients (mean age 87.3 years, 63% female). There was a significant reduction in the mean number of PIMs (pre +0.05 ± 2.59 vs. post -0.78 ± 2.32, p = 0.04) and median DBI (pre -0.004 ± 0.17 vs. post -0.07 ± 0.2, p = 0.03) in postphase compared to prephase. The proportion of polypharmacy at discharge was reduced in the postphase (pre-100% vs. post-90%, p = 0.01). The most deprescribed PIMs as measured by STOPP in postphase were drugs without indication, cardiovascular system drugs and gastrointestinal system drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of a pharmacist-led medication review in RIR service was associated with a significant reduction in the mean number of PIMs, median DBI and polypharmacy. Future studies are needed to determine whether deprescription is sustained to examine correlations to long-term patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

研究药剂师主导的药物审查对提供急性护理替代服务的住院内展(RIR)服务中减药的影响,该服务面向住院老年护理居民。

方法

进行了一项前后观察性研究。在引入药剂师进行全面药物审查并提供减药建议之前(前阶段)和之后(后阶段),收集患者特征以及入院和出院时的药物。使用老年人处方筛选工具(STOPP)第 2 版识别潜在不适当药物(PIM)。使用药物负担指数(DBI)衡量累积的抗胆碱能和镇静药物负担。减药的结果通过从入院到出院 PIM 数量、DBI 评分和多药治疗比例的减少来衡量。

结果

前阶段包括 59 名患者(平均年龄 87.3 岁,63%为女性),后阶段包括 88 名患者(平均年龄 87.3 岁,63%为女性)。与前阶段相比,后阶段的平均 PIM 数量(前 +0.05±2.59 与后 -0.78±2.32,p=0.04)和中位数 DBI(前 -0.004±0.17 与后 -0.07±0.2,p=0.03)均显著降低。后阶段出院时多药治疗的比例降低(前 100%与后 90%,p=0.01)。后阶段按 STOPP 测量的最常见减药 PIM 是无指征药物、心血管系统药物和胃肠道系统药物。

结论

在 RIR 服务中引入药剂师主导的药物审查与 PIM 数量、DBI 中位数和多药治疗的平均数量显著减少相关。需要进一步研究以确定减药是否持续,以检查与长期患者结局的相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验