• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四大顶级综合医学期刊 ICU 随机对照试验。

Randomized Controlled Trials in ICU in the Four Highest-Impact General Medicine Journals.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 1;51(9):e179-e183. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005937. Epub 2023 May 18.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005937
PMID:37199541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10426774/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study ICU trials published in the four highest-impact general medicine journals by comparing them with concurrently published non-ICU trials in the same journals.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2014 and October 2021 in the New England Journal of Medicine , The Lancet , the Journal of the American Medical Association , and the British Medical Journal.

STUDY SELECTION

Original RCT publications investigating any type of intervention in any patient population.

DATA EXTRACTION

ICU RCTs were defined as RCTs exclusively including patients admitted to the ICU. Year and journal of publication, sample size, study design, funding source, study outcome, type of intervention, Fragility Index (FI), and Fragility Quotient were collected.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 2,770 publications were screened. Of 2,431 original RCTs, 132 (5.4%) were ICU RCTs, gradually rising from 4% in 2014 to 7.5% in 2021. ICU RCTs and non-ICU RCTs included a comparable number of patients (634 vs 584, p = 0.528). Notable differences for ICU RCTs were the low occurrence of commercial funding (5% vs 36%, p < 0.001), the low number of RCTs that reached statistical significance (29% vs 65%, p < 0.001), and the low FI when they did reach significance (3 vs 12, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In the last 8 years, RCTs in ICU medicine made up a meaningful, and growing, portion of RCTs published in high-impact general medicine journals. In comparison with concurrently published RCTs in non-ICU disciplines, statistical significance was rare and often hinged on the outcome events of just a few patients. Increased attention should be paid to realistic expectations of treatment effects when designing ICU RCTs to detect differences in treatment effects that are reliable and clinically relevant.

摘要

目的

通过比较在四大最具影响力的普通医学期刊上发表的 ICU 试验与同一期刊同期发表的非 ICU 试验,研究 ICU 试验。

数据来源

在 PubMed 上搜索了 2014 年 1 月至 2021 年 10 月期间在《新英格兰医学杂志》《柳叶刀》《美国医学会杂志》和《英国医学杂志》上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。

研究选择

研究任何类型干预措施在任何患者人群中的原始 RCT 出版物。

数据提取

ICU RCT 定义为仅纳入 ICU 收治患者的 RCT。收集年份和期刊出版、样本量、研究设计、资金来源、研究结果、干预类型、脆弱性指数(FI)和脆弱性商数。

数据综合

共筛选出 2770 篇文献。在 2431 篇原始 RCT 中,有 132 篇(5.4%)为 ICU RCT,逐渐从 2014 年的 4%上升到 2021 年的 7.5%。ICU RCT 和非 ICU RCT 纳入的患者数量相当(634 与 584,p=0.528)。值得注意的是,ICU RCT 中商业资金的低发生率(5%与 36%,p<0.001)、达到统计学意义的 RCT 数量较少(29%与 65%,p<0.001)以及达到统计学意义时的低 FI(3 与 12,p=0.008)。

结论

在过去的 8 年中,重症监护医学的 RCT 占高影响力普通医学期刊发表的 RCT 的相当大且不断增长的部分。与同期发表的非 ICU 学科 RCT 相比,统计学意义很少见,而且往往取决于少数患者的结局事件。在设计 ICU RCT 以检测可靠和临床相关的治疗效果差异时,应更加关注对治疗效果的现实期望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9e/10426774/ed279513c2fb/ccm-51-e179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9e/10426774/ed279513c2fb/ccm-51-e179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9e/10426774/ed279513c2fb/ccm-51-e179-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Randomized Controlled Trials in ICU in the Four Highest-Impact General Medicine Journals.四大顶级综合医学期刊 ICU 随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 1;51(9):e179-e183. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005937. Epub 2023 May 18.
2
Statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials in high-impact journals has improved but was low across medical specialties.高影响力期刊中随机对照试验的统计稳健性有所提高,但在各医学专科中仍处于较低水平。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Number and quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics published in the top general medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals.发表于顶级综合医学以及妇产科杂志上的产科随机对照试验的数量与质量。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Jan;4(1):100509. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100509. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
5
Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis.高影响力医学期刊发表的随机试验相关文章的全球绘制:一项横断面分析。
Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3944-9.
6
Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals Are Associated With Higher Altmetric Attention Scores and Social Media Attention Than Nonorthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials.发表在普通医学期刊上的骨科随机对照试验比非骨科随机对照试验具有更高的 Altmetric 关注度和社交媒体关注度。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1261-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
7
Fragility Index in Cardiovascular Randomized Controlled Trials.心血管随机对照试验中的脆弱性指数。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Dec;12(12):e005755. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005755. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.眼科随机对照试验结果的脆弱性:系统评价。
Ophthalmology. 2018 May;125(5):642-648. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.试验报告的统一标准(CONSORT)以及医学期刊上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的报告完整性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
10
Prevalence of Multiplicity and Appropriate Adjustments Among Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Major Medical Journals.主要医学期刊发表的心血管随机临床试验中多发性的流行情况和适当调整。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203082. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3082.

引用本文的文献

1
Fragility in cardiovascular randomized controlled trials with primary continuous outcomes (2018-2022) from multi-perspectives assessment: a cross-sectional survey.多视角评估2018 - 2022年主要连续性结局的心血管随机对照试验中的脆弱性:一项横断面调查
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2427909. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2427909. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
Composite outcome measures in high-impact critical care randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.高影响力重症随机对照试验中的综合结局指标:系统评价。
Crit Care. 2024 May 28;28(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04967-3.