Faculdade Nova Esperança, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023 Jul;143:105905. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105905. Epub 2023 May 13.
This systematic review aimed to analyze if using polywave light-emitting diodes (LED) to photoactivate resin-based materials (resin composites, adhesive systems, and resin cements) containing alternative photoinitiators provide better physicochemical properties than monowave ones.
Inclusion criteria were in vitro studies that evaluated the degree of conversion, microhardness and flexural strength in resin-based materials containing alternative photoinitiators and light-activated with mono and polywave LEDs. Exclusion criteria were studies that evaluated the physicochemical properties of composites through any material interposed between the LED and the resin composite and studies that exclusively compared different modes and/or light activation times. Selection of studies, data extraction, and risk-of-bias analysis was performed. Data from selected studies were qualitatively analyzed. A systematic search was performed in June 2021 using PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases and grey literature without language restriction.
A total of 18 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Nine studies used diphenyl (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (TPO) as an alternative photoinitiator for resin composite. Polywave LED improved the degree of conversion of resin composite compared to monowave in 9 of the included studies. Polywave LED improved the microhardness of resin composite compared to monowave in 7 of the included studies. Polywave LED improved the degree of conversion for 11 studies and microhardness of resin composite compared to monowave for 7 included studies. No differences in the flexural strength medium between poly and monowave LEDs were observed. The evidence was graded as low quality due to the high risk of bias for 11 studies.
The existing studies, with their limitations, revealed that the polywave light-emitting diode maximizes activation, resulting in a higher degree of double-bond conversion and microhardness of resin composites containing alternative photoinitiators. However, the flexural strength of these materials is not influenced by the type of light activation device.
本系统评价旨在分析使用多波长发光二极管(LED)对含有替代光引发剂的树脂基材料(树脂复合材料、粘接系统和树脂水门汀)进行光致聚合是否能提供比单波长更好的理化性能。
纳入标准为体外研究,评估含有替代光引发剂的树脂基材料的聚合转化率、显微硬度和弯曲强度,这些材料用光单波和多波 LED 激活。排除标准为通过 LED 和树脂复合材料之间插入的任何材料评估复合材料理化性能的研究,以及专门比较不同模式和/或光激活时间的研究。研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险分析是同时进行的。对入选研究的数据进行定性分析。于 2021 年 6 月在 PubMed/Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 ISI Web of Science 数据库及灰色文献中进行了无语言限制的系统检索。
共有 18 项研究纳入定性分析。9 项研究使用二苯甲酰(2,4,6-三甲基苯)膦氧化物(TPO)作为树脂复合材料的替代光引发剂。与单波相比,多波 LED 提高了 9 项研究中树脂复合材料的聚合转化率。与单波相比,多波 LED 提高了 7 项研究中树脂复合材料的显微硬度。11 项研究表明,多波 LED 提高了聚合转化率,7 项研究表明,多波 LED 提高了树脂复合材料的显微硬度。多波和单波 LED 之间未观察到弯曲强度中值的差异。由于 11 项研究存在高偏倚风险,证据质量被评为低质量。
受限于存在局限性的现有研究表明,多波长发光二极管最大限度地激活,从而提高含有替代光引发剂的树脂复合材料的双键转化率和显微硬度。然而,这些材料的弯曲强度不受光激活设备类型的影响。