Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Graduate Programs in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Motion Analysis and Biofeedback Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Aging SMART at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Motion Analysis and Biofeedback Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2023 Jun;106:105981. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105981. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
Gait modification interventions have reported variable results and relied on in-person biofeedback limiting clinical accessibility. Our objective was to assess a remotely delivered and self-directed gait modification for knee osteoarthritis.
This was an unblinded, 2-arm, delayed control, randomized pilot trial (NCT04683913). Adults aged ≥50 years with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis were randomized to an immediate group (Week 0: Baseline, Intervention; Week 6: Follow-up, Week 10: Retention) or delayed group (Week 0: Baseline, Wait Period, Week 6: Secondary Baseline, Intervention, Week 12: Follow-up, Week 16: Retention). Participants practiced modifying their foot progression angle "as much as was comfortable" while receiving support via weekly telerehabilitation appointments and remote monitoring with an instrumented shoe. Primary outcomes included participation, foot progression angle modification magnitude, confidence, difficulty, and satisfaction while secondary outcomes included symptoms and knee biomechanics during gait.
We screened 134 people and randomized 20. There was no loss to follow up and 100% attendance at the telerehabilitation appointments. By follow up, participants reported high confidence (8.6/10), low difficulty (2.0/10), and satisfaction (75%) with the intervention and no significant adverse events. Foot progression angle was modified by 11.4° ± 5.6, which was significantly different (p < 0.001, η = 0.8) when compared between groups. No other between-group differences were significant, while several significant pre-post improvements in pain (d = 0.6, p = 0.006) and knee moments (d = 0.6, p = 0.01) were observed.
A personalized, self-directed gait modification supported with telerehabilitation is feasible, and the preliminary effects on symptoms and biomechanics align with past trials. A larger trial is warranted to evaluate efficacy.
步态修正干预措施的结果各不相同,且依赖于亲身进行的生物反馈,限制了临床应用的可及性。我们的目标是评估一种远程提供和自我指导的膝关节骨关节炎步态修正方法。
这是一项非盲、双臂、延迟对照、随机试验(NCT04683913)。年龄≥50 岁、有症状的膝关节内侧骨关节炎患者被随机分配到立即组(第 0 周:基线,干预;第 6 周:随访,第 10 周:保留)或延迟组(第 0 周:基线,等待期,第 6 周:次要基线,干预,第 12 周:随访,第 16 周:保留)。参与者在接受每周远程康复预约和带仪器的鞋子远程监测的支持下,练习尽可能舒适地改变他们的足进角。主要结果包括参与度、足进角修正幅度、信心、难度和满意度,而次要结果包括步态时的症状和膝关节生物力学。
我们筛查了 134 人并随机分配了 20 人。无失访,远程康复预约的出席率为 100%。随访时,参与者报告对干预措施具有高度信心(8.6/10)、低难度(2.0/10)和满意度(75%),且无显著不良事件。足进角修正幅度为 11.4°±5.6°,与组间比较差异显著(p<0.001,η=0.8)。组间无其他显著差异,而疼痛(d=0.6,p=0.006)和膝关节力矩(d=0.6,p=0.01)的多项显著前后改善。
个性化、自我指导的步态修正方法在远程康复的支持下是可行的,且对症状和生物力学的初步影响与过去的试验一致。需要更大的试验来评估疗效。