• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放牧诱导的牛行为调节了欧亚草原生态系统的次级生产。

Grazing-induced cattle behaviour modulates the secondary production in a Eurasian steppe ecosystem.

机构信息

National Hulunbuir Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

National Hulunbuir Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2023 Sep 1;889:164191. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164191. Epub 2023 May 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164191
PMID:37201816
Abstract

Livestock-grassland interactions are among the most important relationships in grazed grassland ecosystems, where herbivores play a crucial role in plant community and ecosystem functions. However, previous studies primarily have focused on the responses of grasslands to grazing, with few focussing on the effects of livestock behaviour that in turn would influence livestock intake and primary and secondary productivity. Through a 2-year grazing intensity experiment with cattle in Eurasian steppe ecosystem, global positioning system (GPS) collars were used to monitor animal movements, where animal locations were recorded at 10-min intervals during the growing season. We used a random forest model and the K-means method to classify animal behaviour and quantified the spatiotemporal movements of the animals. Grazing intensity appeared to be the predominant driver for cattle behaviour. Foraging time, distance travelled, and utilization area ratio (UAR) all increased with grazing intensity. The distance travelled was positively correlated with foraging time, yielding a decreased daily liveweight gain (LWG) except at light grazing. Cattle UAR showed a seasonal pattern and reached the maximum value in August. In addition, the canopy height, above-ground biomass, carbon content, crude protein, and energy content of plants all affected cattle behaviour. Grazing intensity and the resulting change in above-ground biomass and forage quality jointly determined the spatiotemporal characteristics of livestock behaviour. Increased grazing intensity limited forage resources and promoted intraspecific competition of livestock, which induced longer travelling distance and foraging time, and more even spatial distribution when seeking habitat, which ultimately led to a reduction in LWG. In contrast, under light grazing where there were sufficient forage resources, livestock exhibited higher LWG with less foraging time, shorter travelling distance, and more specialized habitat occupation. These findings support the Optimal Foraging Theory and the Ideal Free Distribution model, which may have important implications for grassland ecosystem management and sustainability.

摘要

家畜-草地相互作用是放牧草地生态系统中最重要的关系之一,其中食草动物在植物群落和生态系统功能中起着至关重要的作用。然而,以前的研究主要集中在草地对放牧的响应上,很少关注家畜行为的影响,而家畜行为反过来又会影响家畜的摄食量以及初级和次级生产力。通过在欧亚草原生态系统中进行为期两年的放牧强度实验,使用全球定位系统 (GPS) 项圈来监测动物的运动,在生长季节期间,以 10 分钟的间隔记录动物的位置。我们使用随机森林模型和 K-均值方法对动物行为进行分类,并量化了动物的时空运动。放牧强度似乎是家畜行为的主要驱动因素。觅食时间、行进距离和利用率区域比 (UAR) 都随着放牧强度的增加而增加。行进距离与觅食时间呈正相关,除了轻度放牧外,每日活体重增加 (LWG) 都会减少。牛 UAR 呈现季节性模式,在 8 月达到最大值。此外,冠层高度、地上生物量、碳含量、粗蛋白和能量含量都会影响牛的行为。放牧强度以及由此引起的地上生物量和饲料质量的变化共同决定了家畜行为的时空特征。增加的放牧强度限制了饲料资源,促进了家畜种内竞争,导致在寻找栖息地时行进距离和觅食时间延长,空间分布更加均匀,从而导致 LWG 减少。相比之下,在有足够饲料资源的轻度放牧下,家畜表现出更高的 LWG,觅食时间更短,行进距离更短,对栖息地的占用更具专业性。这些发现支持最优觅食理论和理想自由分布模型,这可能对草地生态系统管理和可持续性具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Grazing-induced cattle behaviour modulates the secondary production in a Eurasian steppe ecosystem.放牧诱导的牛行为调节了欧亚草原生态系统的次级生产。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Sep 1;889:164191. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164191. Epub 2023 May 17.
2
How does grazing pressure affect feed intake and behavior of livestock in a meadow steppe in northern China and their coupling relationship.在中国北方的草甸草原中,放牧压力如何影响家畜的采食量和行为及其耦合关系。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 15;908:168472. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168472. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
3
Grassland biodiversity and ecosystem functions benefit more from cattle than sheep in mixed grazing: A meta-analysis.混牧中牛比羊更有益于草地生物多样性和生态系统功能:一项荟萃分析。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jul 1;337:117769. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117769. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
4
Grazing influences biomass production and protein content of alpine meadows.放牧对高山草地的生物量生产和蛋白质含量有影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Apr 20;818:151771. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151771. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
5
Animal board invited review: Grassland-based livestock farming and biodiversity.动物委员会邀请的评论:基于草原的畜牧业和生物多样性。
Animal. 2022 Dec;16(12):100671. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100671. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Moderate grazing increased carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus storage in plants and soil in the Eurasian meadow steppe ecosystem.适度放牧增加了欧亚草原生态系统中植物和土壤的碳、氮和磷储量。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Mar 1;914:169864. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169864. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
7
Behavioural responses of beef cattle to different grazing systems and the influence of these responses on water productivity of livestock in a tropical savannah.肉牛对不同放牧系统的行为反应及其对热带稀树草原地区家畜水分生产力的影响。
Animal. 2024 Apr;18(4):101117. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101117. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
8
Adaptive rangeland management benefits grassland birds utilizing opposing vegetation structure in the shortgrass steppe.适应型草原管理有益于利用短草原中相反植被结构的草地鸟类。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jan;30(1):e02020. doi: 10.1002/eap.2020. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
9
Assessing herbivore foraging behavior with GPS collars in a semiarid grassland.利用 GPS 项圈评估半干旱草原食草动物的觅食行为。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Mar 15;13(3):3711-23. doi: 10.3390/s130303711.
10
Livestock grazing to maintain habitat of a critically endangered grassland bird: Is grazer species important?牲畜放牧以维持濒危草原鸟类的栖息地:食草动物种类重要吗?
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jul;32(5):e2587. doi: 10.1002/eap.2587. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Technologies and Solutions for Cattle Tracking: A Review of the State of the Art.牛群追踪的技术与解决方案:技术现状综述
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 9;24(19):6486. doi: 10.3390/s24196486.
2
UAV Assisted Livestock Distribution Monitoring and Quantification: A Low-Cost and High-Precision Solution.无人机辅助牲畜分布监测与量化:一种低成本高精度解决方案
Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;13(19):3069. doi: 10.3390/ani13193069.