Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Activity and Health in Linköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Aug;40(8):1753-1766. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2210676. Epub 2023 May 19.
A best practice physiotherapy model of care (BetterBack MoC) for low back pain (LBP) aimed to improve patients' illness perceptions and self-care enablement, according to the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM).
To confirm if illness perceptions and patient self-care enablement, in line with the CSM, are mediators of treatment effects on disability and pain of the BetterBack MoC for patients with LBP compared to routine primary care. A secondary aim was to explore if illness perceptions and patient self-care enablement are mediators of guideline adherent care.
Pre-planned single mediation analyses tested whether hypothesized mediators at 3 months mediated the treatment effect of the MoC ( = 264) compared to routine care ( = 203) on disability and pain at 6 months. Secondary mediation analyses compared guideline adherent care with non-adherent care.
No indirect effects were identified. The BetterBack intervention did not have superior effects over routine care on the hypothesized mediators. Illness perceptions and self-care enablement were significantly associated with disability and pain at 6 months. Secondary analyses showed significant indirect effects of guideline adherent care through tested mediators.
Despite no indirect effects, patients' illness perceptions and self-care enablement were associated with disability and back pain intensity outcomes and are potentially relevant treatment targets.
根据自我调节的常识模型(CSM),一种针对腰痛(LBP)的最佳实践物理治疗护理模式(BetterBack MoC)旨在改善患者的疾病认知和自我护理能力。
确认根据 CSM,疾病认知和患者自我护理能力是否是 BetterBack MoC 治疗腰痛患者的残疾和疼痛治疗效果的中介,与常规初级保健相比。次要目的是探讨疾病认知和患者自我护理能力是否是遵医嘱护理的中介。
预先计划的单一中介分析测试了假设的中介在 3 个月时是否在 MoC(=264)与常规护理(=203)对 6 个月时残疾和疼痛的治疗效果之间起中介作用。次要中介分析比较了遵医嘱护理与不遵医嘱护理。
没有发现间接影响。BetterBack 干预与常规护理相比,对假设的中介没有更好的效果。疾病认知和自我护理能力与 6 个月时的残疾和疼痛显著相关。二次分析显示,通过测试的中介,遵医嘱护理具有显著的间接影响。
尽管没有间接影响,但患者的疾病认知和自我护理能力与残疾和背痛强度的结果相关,并且是潜在相关的治疗目标。