• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转换为阿柏西普肉毒素A可延长颈部肌张力障碍的药效消退时间并提高疗效。

Conversion to AbobotulinumtoxinA Increases Waning Time and Efficacy for Cervical Dystonia.

作者信息

Samotus Olivia, Jog Mandar

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences London Health Sciences Centre-Lawson Health Research Institute London Ontario Canada.

Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry University of Western London Ontario Canada.

出版信息

Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2023 Mar 1;10(5):756-763. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13696. eCollection 2023 May.

DOI:10.1002/mdc3.13696
PMID:37205243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10186996/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Symptom re-emergence before re-injection negatively impacts cervical dystonia (CD) patients receiving botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) therapy. Longer waning time is associated with abobotulinumtoxinA (abo-BoNT-A) as compared to onabotulinumtoxinA (ona-BoNT-A)/incobotulinumtoxinA (inco-BoNT-A) formulations.

OBJECTIVES

To compare waning time and treatment outcomes when chronically injected CD patients experiencing early waning despite being optimized on BoNT-A (ona-BoNT-A/inco-BoNT-A) were converted to abo-BoNT-A.

METHODS

Thirty-three chronically injected CD participants with a waning time of ≤8 weeks were converted to abo-BoNT-A (1:2.5 dose ratio) for three injections every 12-weeks. The second and third injection patterns were kinematically optimized. Participants were converted back to their original BoNT-A for the fourth injection (1:2.5) using the same third abo-BoNT-A pattern. Participant-perceived waning times were collected post-injections. Clinical scales (Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)) and kinematic measures were collected 12-weeks post-injection and at three peak effect time-points.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, waning time (12-22 days) significantly increased following all abo-BoNT-A treatments ( < 0.005) but was not significantly different at the fourth injection (original BoNT-A reconversion). TWSTRS sub-scores significantly reduced following all abo-BoNT-A treatments ( < 0.0001) and at peak effect following the third injection compared to original BoNT-A. Dysphagia and muscle weakness were reported and comparable to safety of original BoNT-A formulations.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimized patients experiencing waning had significant improvement in the peak benefit as well as the duration of effect when converted to abo-BoNT-A. This effect was toxin dependent as reconversion to the original BoNT-A using the kinematically optimized pattern failed to produce an improvement in waning.

摘要

背景

再次注射前症状复发对接受A型肉毒毒素(BoNT-A)治疗的颈部肌张力障碍(CD)患者产生负面影响。与onabotulinumtoxinA(ona-BoNT-A)/incobotulinumtoxinA(inco-BoNT-A)制剂相比,阿柏西普肉毒毒素A(abo-BoNT-A)的药效消退时间更长。

目的

比较尽管在BoNT-A(ona-BoNT-A/inco-BoNT-A)治疗下仍出现早期药效消退的慢性注射型CD患者转换为abo-BoNT-A后的药效消退时间和治疗效果。

方法

33名慢性注射型CD参与者,其药效消退时间≤8周,转换为abo-BoNT-A(1:2.5剂量比),每12周注射三次。第二和第三次注射模式在运动学上进行了优化。第四次注射(1:2.5)时,参与者恢复使用原来的BoNT-A,采用与第三次abo-BoNT-A相同的模式。注射后收集参与者感知的药效消退时间。在注射后12周和三个峰值效应时间点收集临床量表(多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表(TWSTRS))和运动学指标。

结果

与基线相比,所有abo-BoNT-A治疗后药效消退时间(12 - 22天)显著延长(<0.005),但第四次注射(恢复使用原来的BoNT-A)时无显著差异。所有abo-BoNT-A治疗后TWSTRS子评分显著降低(<0.0001),与原来的BoNT-A相比,第三次注射后的峰值效应时也显著降低。报告了吞咽困难和肌肉无力情况,且与原来的BoNT-A制剂安全性相当。

结论

经历药效消退的优化患者转换为abo-BoNT-A后,峰值效益和疗效持续时间有显著改善。这种效果依赖于毒素,因为采用运动学优化模式恢复使用原来的BoNT-A未能改善药效消退情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/10186996/d846982a33ab/MDC3-10-756-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/10186996/c95cb4de6a8f/MDC3-10-756-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/10186996/79134ff91792/MDC3-10-756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/10186996/d846982a33ab/MDC3-10-756-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/10186996/c95cb4de6a8f/MDC3-10-756-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/10186996/79134ff91792/MDC3-10-756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9f/10186996/d846982a33ab/MDC3-10-756-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Conversion to AbobotulinumtoxinA Increases Waning Time and Efficacy for Cervical Dystonia.转换为阿柏西普肉毒素A可延长颈部肌张力障碍的药效消退时间并提高疗效。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2023 Mar 1;10(5):756-763. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13696. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Evidence-based review and assessment of botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of movement disorders.循证综述与评估肉毒毒素治疗运动障碍。
Toxicon. 2013 Jun 1;67:94-114. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
3
Efficacy and safety of long-term botulinum toxin treatment for acquired cervical dystonia: a 25-year follow-up.长期肉毒毒素治疗获得性颈肌张力障碍的疗效和安全性:25 年随访。
J Neurol. 2023 Jan;270(1):340-347. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11343-0. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Low-Dose Neubotulinum Toxin A versus Low-Dose Abobotulinum Toxin A Injection for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia: A Multicenter, 48-Week, Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Crossover Design Study.低剂量新型肉毒毒素 A 与低剂量阿替卡因肉毒毒素 A 注射治疗颈肌张力障碍:一项多中心、48 周、前瞻性、双盲、随机交叉设计研究。
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Oct 1;13(10):694. doi: 10.3390/toxins13100694.
5
Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study.在肉毒毒素标准注射间隔获益不足的颈部肌张力障碍患者中两种incobotulinumtoxinA注射间隔的疗效和安全性:4期、开放标签、随机、非劣效性研究
Clin Park Relat Disord. 2022 Mar 14;6:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100142. eCollection 2022.
6
Personalized botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia based on kinematic guidance.基于运动学指导的个体化肉毒毒素 A 治疗颈肌张力障碍。
J Neurol. 2018 Jun;265(6):1269-1278. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8819-6. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
7
Clinical differences between botulinum neurotoxin type A and B.A型与B型肉毒杆菌神经毒素的临床差异。
Toxicon. 2015 Dec 1;107(Pt A):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
8
Botulinum toxin type B vs. type A in toxin-naïve patients with cervical dystonia: Randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial.初治颈肌张力障碍患者中B型与A型肉毒毒素对比:随机、双盲、非劣效性试验
Mov Disord. 2008 Mar 15;23(4):510-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.21724.
9
Cumulative effects of long-term treatment with abobotulinumtoxinA in cervical dystonia: Findings from a prospective, observational study.阿柏西普治疗颈部肌张力障碍的长期累积效应:一项前瞻性观察性研究的结果
J Neurol Sci. 2020 Sep 15;416:117015. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117015. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
10
KinesioTaping after botulinum toxin type A for cervical dystonia in adult patients.A型肉毒毒素治疗成人颈肌张力障碍后应用运动贴扎。
Brain Behav. 2022 Apr;12(4):e2541. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2541. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of abobotulinumtoxinA on the clinical features of cervical dystonia in routine practice.阿扑肉毒毒素A在常规治疗中对颈部肌张力障碍临床特征的影响。
Clin Park Relat Disord. 2020 Jun 15;3:100063. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2020.100063. eCollection 2020.
2
Duration of Symptom Relief Between Injections for AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) in Spastic Paresis and Cervical Dystonia: Comparison of Evidence From Clinical Studies.用于痉挛性麻痹和颈部肌张力障碍的阿柏西普肉毒素A(Dysport®)注射之间症状缓解的持续时间:临床研究证据比较
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 25;11:576117. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.576117. eCollection 2020.
3
Patient perspectives on the therapeutic profile of botulinum neurotoxin type A in cervical dystonia.
患者对 A 型肉毒毒素治疗颈肌张力障碍的治疗特性的看法。
J Neurol. 2021 Mar;268(3):903-912. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10217-7. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
4
Tremor in Idiopathic Cervical Dystonia - Possible Implications for Botulinum Toxin Treatment Considering the Col-Cap Classification.特发性颈肌张力障碍震颤 - 考虑到 Col-Cap 分类,对肉毒毒素治疗的可能影响。
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2020 Jul 7;10:13. doi: 10.5334/tohm.63.
5
Use of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Adults with Cervical Dystonia: A Systematic Literature Review.应用阿替瑞林毒素 A 治疗成人颈部肌张力障碍:系统文献回顾。
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Jul 24;12(8):470. doi: 10.3390/toxins12080470.
6
Cumulative effects of long-term treatment with abobotulinumtoxinA in cervical dystonia: Findings from a prospective, observational study.阿柏西普治疗颈部肌张力障碍的长期累积效应:一项前瞻性观察性研究的结果
J Neurol Sci. 2020 Sep 15;416:117015. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117015. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
Is Botulinum Toxin Type A Efficacious, Safe, and Tolerable in Cervical Dystonia?: A Cochrane Review Summary With Commentary.A型肉毒杆菌毒素用于治疗颈部肌张力障碍是否有效、安全且耐受性良好?:Cochrane系统评价综述及述评
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul;99(7):649-651. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001437.
8
How satisfied are cervical dystonia patients after 3 years of botulinum toxin type A treatment? Results from a prospective, long-term observational study.颈肌张力障碍患者接受 A 型肉毒毒素治疗 3 年后的满意度如何?一项前瞻性长期观察研究的结果。
J Neurol. 2019 Dec;266(12):3038-3046. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09527-2. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Personalized botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia based on kinematic guidance.基于运动学指导的个体化肉毒毒素 A 治疗颈肌张力障碍。
J Neurol. 2018 Jun;265(6):1269-1278. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8819-6. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
10
Longitudinal studies of botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia: Why do patients discontinue therapy?肉毒杆菌毒素治疗颈部肌张力障碍的纵向研究:患者为何停止治疗?
Toxicon. 2018 Jun 1;147:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 6.