• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

InterRAI COVID-19 脆弱性筛查器:在 COVID-19 大流行期间对社区中脆弱成年人进行健康监测的结果。

The interRAI COVID-19 vulnerability screener: Results of a health surveillance initiative for vulnerable adults in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, McMaster University, MIP Suite 109A, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.

Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, 1255 Sheppard Ave East, North York, ON M2K1E2, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Oct;113:105056. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105056. Epub 2023 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2023.105056
PMID:37207541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10159666/
Abstract

During the pandemic, the interRAI COVID-19 Vulnerability Screener (CVS) was used to identify community-dwelling older adults or adults with disabilities at risk of negative outcomes and facilitate triage for follow-up with health/social services. The interRAI CVS, a standardized self-report instrument administered virtually by a lay-person, includes COVID-19-related items and psychosocial and physical vulnerability. Our objective was to describe those assessed and identify sub-groups at highest risk of adverse outcomes. Seven community-based organizations in Ontario, Canada, implemented the interRAI CVS. We used descriptive statistics to report results and created a priority indicator for monitoring and/or intervention based on possible COVID-19 symptoms and psychosocial/physical vulnerabilities. We used logistic regression to examine the association between priority level and risk of poor outcomes using fair/poor self-rated health as a proxy measure. The sample included 942 adults assessed (April-November 2020; mean age=79). About 10% of individuals reported potential COVID-19 symptoms and <1% had a positive COVID-19 test/diagnosis. Of those with psychosocial/physical vulnerabilities (73.1%), most common were depressed mood (20.9%), loneliness (21.6%), and limited access to food/medications (7.5%). Overall, 45.7% had a recent doctor or nurse practitioner visit. Odds of fair/poor self-reported health were highest among those who reported both possible symptoms of COVID-19 and psychosocial/physical vulnerabilities (OR 10.9, 95% CI 5.96-20.12) compared to those with neither symptoms nor psychosocial/physical vulnerabilities. The sample represents a population largely unaffected by COVID-19 itself but with identified vulnerabilities. The interRAI CVS allows community providers to stay connected and obtain a better understanding of vulnerable individuals' needs during the pandemic.

摘要

在大流行期间,使用 interRAI COVID-19 脆弱性筛查器(CVS)来识别有负面结果风险的社区居住的老年人或残疾成年人,并为与健康/社会服务的后续跟进进行分诊。interRAI CVS 是一种标准化的自我报告工具,由非专业人员通过虚拟方式进行管理,包括与 COVID-19 相关的项目以及心理社会和身体脆弱性。我们的目标是描述接受评估的人群,并确定最有可能出现不良结果的亚组。加拿大安大略省的七个社区组织实施了 interRAI CVS。我们使用描述性统计数据报告结果,并根据可能的 COVID-19 症状和心理社会/身体脆弱性创建一个监测和/或干预的优先级指标。我们使用逻辑回归检查优先级水平与不良结果风险之间的关联,使用健康自评一般/较差作为代理测量。该样本包括 942 名接受评估的成年人(2020 年 4 月至 11 月;平均年龄=79 岁)。约 10%的个体报告了潜在的 COVID-19 症状,<1%的个体 COVID-19 检测/诊断呈阳性。在有心理社会/身体脆弱性的人群中(73.1%),最常见的是情绪低落(20.9%)、孤独(21.6%)和有限获取食物/药物(7.5%)。总体而言,45.7%的人最近看过医生或护士。与既没有症状也没有心理社会/身体脆弱性的人相比,同时报告 COVID-19 可能症状和心理社会/身体脆弱性的个体健康自评一般/较差的可能性最高(OR 10.9,95%CI 5.96-20.12)。该样本代表了受 COVID-19 直接影响较小但存在脆弱性的人群。interRAI CVS 使社区服务提供者能够在大流行期间保持联系,并更好地了解脆弱人群的需求。

相似文献

1
The interRAI COVID-19 vulnerability screener: Results of a health surveillance initiative for vulnerable adults in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic.InterRAI COVID-19 脆弱性筛查器:在 COVID-19 大流行期间对社区中脆弱成年人进行健康监测的结果。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Oct;113:105056. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105056. Epub 2023 May 5.
2
Impact of COVID-19 on the health and psychosocial status of vulnerable older adults: study protocol for an observational study.2019冠状病毒病对弱势老年人健康和心理社会状况的影响:一项观察性研究的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1814. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09900-1.
3
Loneliness Progression Among Older Adults During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States and Canada.孤独感在美加两国老年群体中的发展:新冠疫情早期阶段。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Apr 1;77(4):e23-e29. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab229.
4
Impacts of the COVID-19 lockdown on self-reported mood and self-rated health of community-dwelling adults with chronic illness.COVID-19 封锁对社区居住的慢性病成年人报告的情绪和自评健康的影响。
N Z Med J. 2023 Mar 24;136(1572):46-60. doi: 10.26635/6965.6003.
5
Letter to the Editor: THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS.致编辑的信:COVID-19 大流行对精神分裂症患者的影响。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021 Fall;32(3):219-221. doi: 10.5080/u26175.
6
Letter to the Editor: THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS.致编辑的信:COVID-19 大流行对精神分裂症患者的影响。
7
Convergent validity of the interRAI-HC for societal costs estimates in comparison with the RUD Lite instrument in community dwelling older adults.与RUD Lite工具相比,interRAI-HC在社区居住老年人社会成本估计中的收敛效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 25;16(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1702-1.
8
Changes in loneliness prevalence and its associated factors among Bangladeshi older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,孟加拉国老年人孤独感的变化及其相关因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 4;17(11):e0277247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277247. eCollection 2022.
9
Psychometric Properties, Feasibility, and Acceptability of the Self-Reported interRAI Check-Up Assessment.《自我报告的 interRAI Check-Up 评估的心理测量特性、可行性和可接受性》。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jan;23(1):117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10
Assessment of Functional Mobility After COVID-19 in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.COVID-19 后 50 岁及以上成年人的功能性移动能力评估:加拿大老龄化纵向研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2146168. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46168.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of an electronic wellness instrument in the integrated health and social care of older adults: a group concept mapping study.利用电子健康仪器实现老年人健康与社会护理一体化:群组概念映射研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):864. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11320-5.
2
A comparison of 3 frailty measures and adverse outcomes in the intake home care population: a retrospective cohort study.居家护理人群中三种衰弱测量方法与不良结局的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2020 Dec 1;8(4):E796-E809. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200083. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.