• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于肝移植后移植纤维化个体化动态诊断的深度学习框架:一项回顾性、单加拿大中心、纵向研究。

A deep learning framework for personalised dynamic diagnosis of graft fibrosis after liver transplantation: a retrospective, single Canadian centre, longitudinal study.

机构信息

Ajmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Jul;5(7):e458-e466. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00068-7. Epub 2023 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00068-7
PMID:37210229
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recurrent graft fibrosis after liver transplantation can threaten both graft and patient survival. Therefore, early detection of fibrosis is essential to avoid disease progression and the need for retransplantation. Non-invasive blood-based biomarkers of fibrosis are limited by moderate accuracy and high cost. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of machine learning algorithms in detecting graft fibrosis using longitudinal clinical and laboratory data.

METHODS

In this retrospective, longitudinal study, we trained machine learning algorithms, including our novel weighted long short-term memory (LSTM) model, to predict the risk of significant fibrosis using follow-up data from 1893 adults who had a liver transplantation between Feb 1, 1987, and Dec 30, 2019, with at least one liver biopsy post transplantation. Liver biopsy samples with indefinitive fibrosis stage and those from patients with multiple transplantations were excluded. Longitudinal clinical variables were collected from transplantation to the date of last available liver biopsy. Deep learning models were trained on 70% of the patients as the training set and 30% of the patients as the test set. The algorithms were also separately tested on longitudinal data from patients in a subgroup of patients (n=149) who had transient elastography within 1 year before or after the date of liver biopsy. Weighted LSTM model performance for diagnosing significant fibrosis was compared against LSTM, other deep learning models (recurrent neural network and temporal convolutional network), and machine learning models (Random Forest, Support vector machines, Logistic regression, Lasso regression, and Ridge regression) and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), and transient elastography.

FINDINGS

1893 people who had a liver transplantation (1261 [67%] men and 632 [33%] women) with at least one liver biopsy between Jan 1, 1992, and June 30, 2020, were included in the study (591 [31%] cases and 1302 [69%] controls). The median age at liver transplantation was 53·7 years (IQR 47·3-59·0) for cases and 55·3 years (48·0 to 61·2) for controls. The median time interval between transplant and liver biopsy was 21 months (5 to 71). The weighted LSTM model (area under the curve 0·798 [95% CI 0·790 to 0·810]) consistently outperformed other methods, including unweighted LSTM (0·761 [0·750 to 0·769]; p=0·031) Recurrent Neural Network (0·736 [0·721 to 0·744]), Temporal Convolutional Networks (0·700 [0·662 to 0·747], and Random Forest 0·679 [0·652 to 0·707]), FIB-4 (0·650 [0·636 to 0·663]) and APRI (0·682 [0·671 to 0·694]) when diagnosing F2 or worse stage fibrosis. In a subgroup of patients with transient elastography results, weighted LSTM was not significantly better at detecting fibrosis (≥F2; 0·705 [0·687 to 0·724]) than transient elastography (0·685 [0·662 to 0·704]). The top ten variables predictive for significant fibrosis were recipient age, primary indication for transplantation, donor age, and longitudinal data for creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, platelets, white blood cell count, and weight.

INTERPRETATION

Deep learning algorithms, particularly weighted LSTM, outperform other routinely used non-invasive modalities and could help with the earlier diagnosis of graft fibrosis using longitudinal clinical and laboratory variables. The list of most important predictive variables for the development of fibrosis will enable clinicians to modify their management accordingly to prevent onset of graft cirrhosis.

FUNDING

Canadian Institute of Health Research, American Society of Transplantation, Toronto General and Western Hospital Foundation, and Paladin Labs.

摘要

背景

肝移植后反复发生的移植肝纤维化会威胁移植物和患者的生存。因此,早期发现纤维化对于避免疾病进展和需要再次移植至关重要。纤维化的非侵入性血液生物标志物的准确性有限,且成本较高。我们旨在利用纵向临床和实验室数据评估机器学习算法检测移植肝纤维化的准确性。

方法

在这项回顾性、纵向研究中,我们训练了机器学习算法,包括我们新的加权长短期记忆(LSTM)模型,使用 1893 名成人的随访数据来预测移植肝纤维化的风险,这些患者于 1987 年 2 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 30 日之间接受了肝移植,并且在移植后至少有一次肝活检。排除了纤维化分期不确定的肝活检样本和多次接受肝移植的患者。从移植到最后一次肝活检的时间内收集了纵向临床变量。将 70%的患者作为训练集,30%的患者作为测试集,对深度学习模型进行了训练。还分别在一组(n=149)患者的纵向数据上测试了算法,这些患者在肝活检日期前或后 1 年内接受了瞬时弹性成像。比较了加权 LSTM 模型对显著纤维化的诊断性能与 LSTM、其他深度学习模型(递归神经网络和时间卷积网络)以及机器学习模型(随机森林、支持向量机、逻辑回归、套索回归和岭回归)和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶-血小板比值指数(APRI)、纤维化-4 指数(FIB-4)和瞬时弹性成像。

结果

本研究共纳入了 1893 名接受肝移植的患者(1261 名男性[67%]和 632 名女性[33%]),这些患者在 1992 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日之间进行了至少一次肝活检(591 例病例和 1302 例对照)。肝移植时的中位年龄为病例组 53.7 岁(IQR 47.3-59.0),对照组为 55.3 岁(48.0-61.2)。移植和肝活检之间的中位时间间隔为 21 个月(5-71)。加权 LSTM 模型(曲线下面积 0.798[95%CI 0.790-0.810])在诊断 F2 或更严重的纤维化时,始终优于其他方法,包括未加权 LSTM(0.761[0.750-0.769];p=0.031)、递归神经网络(0.736[0.721-0.744])、时间卷积网络(0.700[0.662-0.747])和随机森林(0.679[0.652-0.707])、FIB-4(0.650[0.636-0.663])和 APRI(0.682[0.671-0.694])。在瞬时弹性成像结果的亚组患者中,加权 LSTM 在检测纤维化(≥F2;0.705[0.687-0.724])方面并不显著优于瞬时弹性成像(0.685[0.662-0.704])。预测显著纤维化的前 10 个最重要变量是受者年龄、移植的主要适应证、供者年龄以及纵向数据的肌酐、丙氨酸氨基转移酶、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶、总胆红素、血小板、白细胞计数和体重。

结论

深度学习算法,特别是加权 LSTM,优于其他常用的非侵入性方法,可以利用纵向临床和实验室数据更早地诊断移植肝纤维化。纤维化发展的最重要预测变量列表将使临床医生能够相应地调整其治疗方案,以防止移植物肝硬化的发生。

资金

加拿大卫生研究院、美国移植学会、多伦多总医院和西部医院基金会以及 Paladin 实验室。

相似文献

1
A deep learning framework for personalised dynamic diagnosis of graft fibrosis after liver transplantation: a retrospective, single Canadian centre, longitudinal study.一种用于肝移植后移植纤维化个体化动态诊断的深度学习框架:一项回顾性、单加拿大中心、纵向研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Jul;5(7):e458-e466. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00068-7. Epub 2023 May 18.
2
Development and validation of an ensemble machine learning framework for detection of all-cause advanced hepatic fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study.用于检测全因性晚期肝纤维化的集成机器学习框架的开发与验证:一项回顾性队列研究
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Mar;4(3):e188-e199. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00270-3.
3
Long-term mortality risk stratification of liver transplant recipients: real-time application of deep learning algorithms on longitudinal data.肝移植受者的长期死亡率风险分层:深度学习算法在纵向数据上的实时应用。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 May;3(5):e295-e305. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00040-6. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
4
Stepwise application of fibrosis index based on four factors, red cell distribution width-platelet ratio, and aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio for compensated hepatitis B fibrosis detection.逐步应用基于四个因素、红细胞分布宽度-血小板比值和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶-血小板比值的纤维化指数检测代偿性乙型肝炎纤维化。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;33(1):256-263. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13811.
5
Assessment of graft fibrosis by transient elastography in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation.活体肝移植术后丙型肝炎复发患者通过瞬时弹性成像评估移植肝纤维化情况。
Transplantation. 2008 Jan 15;85(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000297248.18483.16.
6
Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Fibrosis Models to Detect Change in Fibrosis Stage.无创性纤维化模型诊断准确性:检测纤维化分期变化。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;17(9):1877-1885.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.12.031. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
7
AST-to-platelet ratio index in non-invasive assessment of long-term graft fibrosis following pediatric liver transplantation.天冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值指数在小儿肝移植术后长期移植物纤维化无创评估中的应用
Pediatr Transplant. 2016 Mar;20(2):222-6. doi: 10.1111/petr.12661. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
Optimization of hepatitis B cirrhosis detection by stepwise application of transient elastography and routine biomarkers.通过逐步应用瞬时弹性成像和常规生物标志物优化乙型肝炎肝硬化检测
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;32(2):459-465. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13475.
9
APRI and FIB-4 Scores Are Useful After Liver Transplantation Independently of Etiology.APRI和FIB-4评分在肝移植后不论病因均具有实用性。
Transplant Proc. 2009 Mar;41(2):679-81. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.12.014.
10
Performance of transient elastography and serum fibrosis biomarkers for non-invasive evaluation of recurrent fibrosis after liver transplantation: A meta-analysis.瞬时弹性成像和血清纤维化生物标志物用于肝移植后复发性纤维化无创评估的性能:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 27;12(9):e0185192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185192. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
GraftIQ: Hybrid multi-class neural network integrating clinical insight for multi-outcome prediction in liver transplant recipients.移植智能量化(GraftIQ):整合临床见解的混合多类神经网络,用于肝移植受者的多结果预测。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 28;16(1):4943. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59610-8.
2
The impact of donor liver fibrosis on the outcomes of patients who undergo liver transplant: a cohort study from UNOS database.供体肝纤维化对肝移植患者预后的影响:一项来自器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库的队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 10;12:1547200. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1547200. eCollection 2025.
3
Utilizing Machine Learning to Predict Liver Allograft Fibrosis by Leveraging Clinical and Imaging Data.
利用机器学习通过整合临床和影像数据预测肝移植纤维化
Clin Transplant. 2025 Apr;39(4):e70148. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70148.
4
The insight to history and trends of transient elastography for assessing liver fibrosis-a bibliometric analysis.用于评估肝纤维化的瞬时弹性成像技术的历史与趋势洞察——一项文献计量分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Apr 1;15(4):2971-2986. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2117. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
5
Time series forecasting of Valley fever infection in Maricopa County, AZ using LSTM.使用长短期记忆网络(LSTM)对亚利桑那州马里科帕县谷热感染进行时间序列预测。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Feb 5;43:101010. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101010. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Comparison of time-to-event machine learning models in predicting biliary complication and mortality rate in liver transplant patients.用于预测肝移植患者胆道并发症和死亡率的生存时间机器学习模型比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 8;15(1):4768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89570-4.
7
autoimmune hepatitis? - Summary of the 5 international autoimmune hepatitis group research workshop 2024.自身免疫性肝炎?——2024年第五届国际自身免疫性肝炎小组研究研讨会综述
JHEP Rep. 2024 Nov 12;7(2):101265. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101265. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
Wise Roles and Future Visionary Endeavors of Current Emperor: Advancing Dynamic Methods for Longitudinal Microbiome Meta-Omics Data in Personalized and Precision Medicine.当代帝王的明智角色与未来前瞻性努力:推进个性化与精准医学中纵向微生物组元组学数据的动态方法
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Dec;11(47):e2400458. doi: 10.1002/advs.202400458. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
9
The transformative potential of artificial intelligence in solid organ transplantation.人工智能在实体器官移植中的变革潜力。
Front Transplant. 2024 Mar 15;3:1361491. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1361491. eCollection 2024.
10
Bayesian and deep-learning models applied to the early detection of ovarian cancer using multiple longitudinal biomarkers.贝叶斯和深度学习模型在使用多个纵向生物标志物进行卵巢癌早期检测中的应用。
Cancer Med. 2024 Apr;13(7):e7163. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7163.