Suppr超能文献

基于帕金森病问卷 39 项的功能性移动综合评分(FMCS)在帕金森病患者中的验证。

Validation of a Parkinson's disease questionnaire-39-based functional mobility composite score (FMCS) in people with Parkinson's disease.

机构信息

Transversal Translational Medicine, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg; Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg; Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2023 Jul;112:105442. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105442. Epub 2023 May 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Functional mobility is an important outcome for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP). Despite this, there is no established patient-reported outcome measure that serves as a gold standard for assessing patient-reported functional mobility in PwP. We aimed to validate the algorithm calculating the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) based Functional Mobility Composite Score (FMCS).

METHODS

We designed a count-based algorithm to measure patient-reported functional mobility in PwP from items of the PDQ-39 subscales mobility and activities of daily living. Convergent validity of the algorithm calculating the PDQ-39-based FMCS was assessed using the objective Timed Up and Go (n = 253) and discriminative validity was assessed by comparing the FMCS with patient-reported (MDS-UPDRS II) and clinician-assessed (MDS-UPDRS III) motor symptoms as well as between disease stages (H&Y) and PIGD phenotypes (n = 736). Participants were between 22 and 92 years old, with a disease duration from 0 to 32 years and 64.9% in a H&Y 1-2 ranging from 1 to 5.

RESULTS

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) ranging from -0.45 to -0.77 (p < 0.001) indicated convergent validity. Hence, a t-test suggested sufficient ability of the FMCS to discriminate (p < 0.001) between patient-reported and clinician-assessed motor symptoms. More specifically, FMCS was more strongly associated with patient-reported MDS-UPDRS II (r = -0.77) than clinician-reported MDS-UPDRS III (r = -0.45) and can discriminate between disease stages as between PIGD phenotypes (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The FMCS is a valid composite score to assess functional mobility through patient reports in PwP for studying functional mobility in studies using the PDQ-39.

摘要

简介

功能性移动能力是帕金森病患者(PwP)的一个重要预后指标。尽管如此,目前还没有确立的患者报告结局测量标准,可以作为评估 PwP 患者报告功能性移动能力的金标准。我们旨在验证基于帕金森病问卷 39 项(PDQ-39)的算法计算得出的功能性移动能力综合评分(FMCS)。

方法

我们设计了一种基于计数的算法,用于从 PDQ-39 子量表移动性和日常生活活动的项目中测量 PwP 患者报告的功能性移动能力。该算法计算得出的 PDQ-39 基于 FMCS 的收敛效度通过客观计时起立行走测试(TUG)进行评估(n=253),区分效度通过将 FMCS 与患者报告的(MDS-UPDRS II)和临床医生评估的(MDS-UPDRS III)运动症状以及疾病分期(H&Y)和 PIGD 表型(n=736)进行比较来评估。参与者年龄在 22 岁至 92 岁之间,疾病持续时间从 0 年到 32 年不等,64.9%处于 H&Y 1-2 阶段,范围为 1 至 5。

结果

Spearman 相关系数(r)范围从-0.45 到-0.77(p<0.001),表明具有收敛效度。因此,t 检验表明 FMCS 具有足够的能力来区分(p<0.001)患者报告的和临床医生评估的运动症状。更具体地说,FMCS 与患者报告的 MDS-UPDRS II(r=-0.77)的相关性强于与临床医生报告的 MDS-UPDRS III(r=-0.45)的相关性,并且可以区分疾病阶段与 PIGD 表型(p<0.001)。

结论

FMCS 是一种有效的综合评分,可通过 PwP 患者的报告来评估功能性移动能力,用于使用 PDQ-39 进行的研究中研究功能性移动能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验