• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泰国严重皮肤不良反应患者院内死亡的预测因素。

Key factors predicting the in-hospital mortality of patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions in Thailand.

机构信息

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Skin and Allergy Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Biostatistics Excellence Center, Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, The Skin and Allergy Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Sep;37(9):1881-1890. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19222. Epub 2023 May 27.

DOI:10.1111/jdv.19222
PMID:37212641
Abstract

BACKGROUND

At present, no predictive models are available to determine the probability of in-hospital mortality rates (HMRs) in all phenotypes of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).

OBJECTIVES

Our study explored whether simple clinical and laboratory assessments could help predict the HMRs in any phenotypes of SCAR patients.

METHODS

Factors influencing HMRs in 195 adults diagnosed with different SCAR phenotypes were identified, and their optimal cut-offs were determined by Youden's index. Predictive equations for HMRs for all SCAR patients and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) patients were determined using the exact logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) patients were significantly older, with a short time from drug exposure to reaction, and higher neutrophil count compared to SJS/TEN and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS, p < 0.001). Peripheral blood eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytosis and elevated liver transaminase enzymes were significantly higher in DRESS. SJS/TEN phenotype, age ≥ 71.5 years, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 4.08 (high NLR) and systemic infection were factors predicting in-hospital mortality in all SCAR subjects. The ALLSCAR model developed from these factors demonstrated high-diagnostic accuracy for predicting HMRs in all SCAR phenotypes (area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) = 0.95). The risk of in-hospital death was significantly increased in SCAR patients with high NLR after adjusting for systemic infection. The model derived from high NLR, systemic infection and age yielded higher accuracy than SCORTEN (AUC = 0.77) for predicting the HMRs in SJS/TEN patients (AUC = 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Being older, having systemic infection, having a high NLR and SJS/TEN phenotype increases ALLSCAR scores, which in turn increases the risk of in-hospital mortality. These basic clinical and laboratory parameters can easily be obtained in any hospital setting. Despite its simple approach, further validation of the model is warranted.

摘要

背景

目前,尚无预测模型可用于确定所有严重皮肤不良反应(SCAR)表型的院内死亡率(HMR)概率。

目的

本研究探讨简单的临床和实验室评估是否有助于预测任何 SCAR 患者表型的 HMR。

方法

确定了 195 例不同 SCAR 表型患者的 HMR 影响因素,并通过 Youden 指数确定其最佳截断值。使用精确逻辑回归模型确定所有 SCAR 患者和史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(SJS)/中毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN)患者 HMR 的预测方程。

结果

急性全身性发疹性脓疱病(AGEP)患者年龄明显较大,从药物暴露到反应的时间较短,中性粒细胞计数高于 SJS/TEN 和药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状(DRESS,p < 0.001)。DRESS 外周血嗜酸性粒细胞、非典型淋巴细胞增多和肝转氨酶升高更为明显。SJS/TEN 表型、年龄≥71.5 岁、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值≥4.08(高 NLR)和全身感染是所有 SCAR 患者住院死亡率的预测因素。从这些因素中开发的 ALLSCAR 模型对所有 SCAR 表型的 HMR 预测具有较高的诊断准确性(受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.95)。在调整全身感染后,NLR 较高的 SCAR 患者的住院死亡风险显著增加。与 SCORTEN(AUC=0.77)相比,从高 NLR、全身感染和年龄得出的模型预测 SJS/TEN 患者 HMR 的准确性更高(AUC=0.97)。

结论

年龄较大、有全身感染、高 NLR 和 SJS/TEN 表型会增加 ALLSCAR 评分,从而增加住院死亡率。这些基本的临床和实验室参数可以在任何医院环境中轻松获得。尽管方法简单,但仍需要进一步验证该模型。

相似文献

1
Key factors predicting the in-hospital mortality of patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions in Thailand.泰国严重皮肤不良反应患者院内死亡的预测因素。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Sep;37(9):1881-1890. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19222. Epub 2023 May 27.
2
Clinical features and prognostic factors of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions: A single-center retrospective study of 209 cases in China.严重皮肤不良反应的临床特征及预后因素:一项对中国209例患者的单中心回顾性研究
Int Immunopharmacol. 2023 Jan;114:109530. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109530. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
3
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions: A 5-year retrospective study at Hospital Melaka, Malaysia, from December 2014 to February 2020.严重皮肤不良反应:马来西亚马六甲医院 2014 年 12 月至 2020 年 2 月的 5 年回顾性研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2022 Jul;77(4):409-414.
4
A retrospective, 5-year, clinicoepidemiological study of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).一项回顾性、5 年、临床流行病学研究严重皮肤不良反应 (SCARs)。
Int J Dermatol. 2021 May;60(5):579-588. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15416. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
5
Systematic review of BRAF/MEK inhibitors-induced Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (SCARs).BRAF/MEK抑制剂诱发的严重皮肤不良反应(SCARs)的系统评价。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Mar;35(3):607-614. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16894. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
Drug-induced liver injury associated with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions: A nationwide study in Taiwan.药物性肝损伤与严重皮肤不良反应相关:台湾的一项全国性研究。
Liver Int. 2021 Nov;41(11):2671-2680. doi: 10.1111/liv.14990. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
7
Aetiopathogenesis of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) in children: A 9-year experience in a tertiary care paediatric hospital setting.儿童严重皮肤不良反应(SCARs)的病因发病机制:三级儿童保健医院 9 年经验。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2020 Jan;50(1):61-73. doi: 10.1111/cea.13513. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
8
A multicentre study to determine the value and safety of drug patch tests for the three main classes of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions.一项多中心研究,旨在确定药物斑贴试验在三种主要严重皮肤不良反应类别的价值和安全性。
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Mar;168(3):555-62. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12125.
9
Recognition and Management of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (Including Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis).严重皮肤不良反应的识别和处理(包括药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状、史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症)。
Med Clin North Am. 2021 Jul;105(4):577-597. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2021.04.001.
10
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions associated with the immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case/non-case analysis using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.严重皮肤不良反应与免疫检查点抑制剂相关:利用食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统进行的病例/非病例分析。
Australas J Dermatol. 2024 May;65(3):243-253. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14262. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Features of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor versus Non-Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Drugs in China: A Cross-Sectional Study and Literature Review.中国免疫检查点抑制剂与非免疫检查点抑制剂药物所致史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的临床特征:一项横断面研究及文献综述
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Oct 22;17:7591-7605. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S491791. eCollection 2024.
2
The Australasian Registry for Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (AUS-SCAR) - Providing a roadmap for closing the diagnostic, patient, and healthcare gaps for a group of rare drug eruptions.澳大利亚严重皮肤不良反应注册中心(AUS-SCAR)——为消除一组罕见药物性皮疹的诊断、患者及医疗保健差距提供路线图。
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Aug 5;17(8):100936. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100936. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Correlations between histopathologic findings, serum biomarker levels, and clinical outcomes in Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN).史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症(SJS/TEN)中组织病理学发现、血清生物标志物水平与临床结局的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 21;13(1):13620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40812-3.