Declerck Mathieu, Meade Gabriela, Midgley Katherine J, Holcomb Phillip J, Roelofs Ardi, Emmorey Karen
School of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, USA.
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021 Dec 23;2(4):628-646. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00032. eCollection 2021.
Models vary in the extent to which language control processes are domain general. Those that posit that language control is at least partially domain general insist on an overlap between language control and executive control at the goal level. To further probe whether or not language control is domain general, we conducted the first event-related potential (ERP) study that directly compares language-switch costs, as an index of language control, and task-switch costs, as an index of executive control. The language switching and task switching methodologies were identical, except that the former required switching between languages (English or Spanish) whereas the latter required switching between tasks (color naming or category naming). This design allowed us to directly compare control processes at the goal level (cue-locked ERPs) and at the task performance level (picture-locked ERPs). We found no significant differences in the switch-related cue-locked and picture-locked ERP patterns across the language and task switching paradigms. These results support models of domain-general language control.
不同模型中语言控制过程的领域通用性程度各异。那些认为语言控制至少部分具有领域通用性的模型,坚持在目标层面语言控制与执行控制之间存在重叠。为了进一步探究语言控制是否具有领域通用性,我们开展了首个事件相关电位(ERP)研究,该研究直接比较了作为语言控制指标的语言切换成本和作为执行控制指标的任务切换成本。语言切换和任务切换方法相同,只是前者要求在语言(英语或西班牙语)之间切换,而后者要求在任务(颜色命名或类别命名)之间切换。这种设计使我们能够直接比较目标层面(线索锁定ERP)和任务执行层面(图片锁定ERP)的控制过程。我们发现在语言和任务切换范式中,与切换相关的线索锁定和图片锁定ERP模式没有显著差异。这些结果支持了领域通用语言控制的模型。