Suppr超能文献

托法替布联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib combined with methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Gao Yan, Gao Yi-Ni, Wang Mei-Jiao, Zhang Yi, Zhang Feng-Qi, He Zhi-Xing, Chen Wu, Li Hai-Chang, Xie Zhi-Jun, Wen Cheng-Ping

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Rheumatology of Zhejiang Province, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Apr 28;9(5):e15839. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15839. eCollection 2023 May.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Trials were identified from four electronic databases: PubMed, Web of science, Cochrane Library and EMBASE from inception to April 2022. Two independent reviewers evaluated each database to scan the title, abstract and keywords of each record retrieved. Full articles were further assessed when the information suggested that the study was a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing tofacitinib combined with MTX vs. MTX monotherapy in patients with active RA. Data were extracted from the literature, and the methodological quality of the included literature were evaluated and screened by two reviewers independently. The results were analyzed using RevMan5.3 software. The full text of the studies and extracted data were reviewed independently according to PRISMA guidelines. The outcome indicators were ACR 20, ACR 50, ACR 70, Disease activity score 28 (DAS28), erythrocyte sedimentation Rate (ESR) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Of 1152 studies yielded by the search, 4 were retained, totaling 1782 patients (1345 treated with tofacitinib combined with MTX vs 437 received MTX. In the trial of insufficient response to MTX treatment, tofacitinib combined with MTX had significant advantages compared with MTX monotherapy. Numerically higher ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were observed in the tofacitinib combined with MTX groups versus MTX monotherapy. ACR20 (odds ratio (OR), 3.62; 95% CI, 2.84-4.61;  < 0.001), ACR50 (OR, 5.17; 95% CI, 3.62-7.38;  < 0.001), and ACR70 (OR, 8.44; 95% CI, 4.34-16.41;  < 0.001), DAS28 (ESR) < 2.6 (OR, 4.71, 95% CI, 2.06-10.77;  < 0.001). The probability of adverse events of tofacitinib combined with MTX was lower than that of MTX monotherapy (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.08-1.88;  = 0.01). The number of cases discontinued due to lack of efficacy or adverse events was similar in both groups (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.52-1.68). The probability of abnormal liver enzymes in the treatment of tofacitinib combined with MTX was significantly lower than that of MTX monotherapy (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.35-2.56). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in severe adverse reactions, neutropenia, anemia and cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of ACR20/50/70 and DAS28 (ESR), tofacitinib combined with MTX demonstrated superiority to MTX monotherapy in the treatment of patients with refractory RA. Considering the hepatoprotective and observably therapeutic efficacy, tofacitinib combined with MTX could be effective in treating refractory RA. However, in terms of hepatoprotective, it requires further large-scale and high-quality clinical trials to confirm.

摘要

目的

评估托法替布联合甲氨蝶呤(MTX)与MTX单药治疗对活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

从四个电子数据库检索试验:PubMed、Web of science、Cochrane图书馆和EMBASE,检索时间从建库至2022年4月。两名独立审阅者评估每个数据库,浏览检索到的每条记录的标题、摘要和关键词。当信息提示该研究为比较托法替布联合MTX与MTX单药治疗活动性RA患者的随机临床试验(RCT)时,进一步评估全文。从文献中提取数据,两名审阅者独立评估和筛选纳入文献的方法学质量。使用RevMan5.3软件分析结果。根据PRISMA指南独立审查研究全文和提取的数据。结局指标为美国风湿病学会(ACR)20、ACR50、ACR70、28关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和不良事件(AE)。

结果

检索出的1152项研究中,保留4项,共1782例患者(1345例接受托法替布联合MTX治疗,437例接受MTX治疗)。在MTX治疗反应不足的试验中,托法替布联合MTX与MTX单药治疗相比具有显著优势。托法替布联合MTX组的ACR20、ACR50和ACR70反应率在数值上高于MTX单药治疗组。ACR20(比值比(OR),3.62;95%置信区间(CI),2.84 - 4.61;P < 0.001),ACR50(OR,5.17;95%CI,3.62 - 7.38;P < 0.001),ACR70(OR,8.44;95%CI,4.34 - 16.41;P < 0.001),DAS28(ESR)< 2.6(OR,4.71,95%CI,2.06 - 10.77;P < 0.001)。托法替布联合MTX的不良事件发生率低于MTX单药治疗(OR,1.42;95%CI,1.08 - 1.88;P = 0.01)。两组因疗效不佳或不良事件停药的病例数相似(OR,0.93;95%CI,0.52 - 1.68)。托法替布联合MTX治疗时肝酶异常的发生率显著低于MTX单药治疗(OR,1.86;95%CI,1.35 - 2.56)。然而,两组在严重不良反应、中性粒细胞减少、贫血和心血管疾病方面无显著差异。

结论

在ACR20/50/70和DAS28(ESR)方面,托法替布联合MTX在治疗难治性RA患者中显示出优于MTX单药治疗的效果。考虑到其肝脏保护作用和明显的治疗效果,托法替布联合MTX可能有效治疗难治性RA。然而,在肝脏保护方面,需要进一步大规模、高质量的临床试验来证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7526/10196519/0e53ecd5c4d7/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验