Suppr超能文献

使用一种可植入式、不可排出的体外连续流动循环支持系统作为心脏移植的桥接。

Use of a surgically implanted, nondischargeable, extracorporeal continuous flow circulatory support system as a bridge to heart transplant.

机构信息

Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Servicio de Cardiología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), A Coruña, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Spain.

出版信息

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 Jan;77(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe the clinical outcomes of the use of the CentriMag acute circulatory support system as a bridge to emergency heart transplantation (HTx).

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive analysis of the clinical outcomes of consecutive HTx candidates included in a multicenter retrospective registry who were treated with the CentriMag device, configured either for left ventricular support (LVS) or biventricular support (BVS). All patients were listed for high-priority HTx. The study assessed the period 2010 to 2020 and involved 16 transplant centers around Spain. We excluded patients treated with isolated right ventricular support or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation without LVS. The primary endpoint was 1-year post-HTx survival.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 213 emergency HTx candidates bridged on CentriMag LVS and 145 on CentriMag BVS. Overall, 303 (84.6%) patients received a transplant and 53 (14.8%) died without having an organ donor during the index hospitalization. Median time on the device was 15 days, with 66 (18.6%) patients being supported for> 30 days. One-year posttransplant survival was 77.6%. Univariable and multivariable analyses showed no statistically significant differences in pre- or post-HTx survival in patients managed with BVS vs LVS. Patients managed with BVS had higher rates of bleeding, need for transfusion, hemolysis and renal failure than patients managed with LVS, while the latter group showed a higher incidence of ischemic stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

In a setting of candidate prioritization with short waiting list times, bridging to HTx with the CentriMag system was feasible and resulted in acceptable on-support and posttransplant outcomes.

摘要

简介和目的

我们旨在描述 CentriMag 急性循环支持系统作为紧急心脏移植(HTx)桥接的临床结果。

方法

我们对纳入多中心回顾性登记的连续 HTx 候选者的临床结果进行了描述性分析,这些候选者使用 CentriMag 装置进行治疗,配置为左心室支持(LVS)或双心室支持(BVS)。所有患者均被列为高优先级 HTx。该研究评估了 2010 年至 2020 年期间,涉及西班牙 16 个移植中心。我们排除了仅接受右心室支持或无 LVS 的静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗的患者。主要终点是 HTx 后 1 年的存活率。

结果

该研究人群包括 213 例接受 CentriMag LVS 桥接的紧急 HTx 候选者和 145 例接受 CentriMag BVS 桥接的候选者。总体而言,303(84.6%)名患者接受了移植,53(14.8%)名患者在指数住院期间没有器官捐献者而死亡。设备中位使用时间为 15 天,66(18.6%)名患者支持时间> 30 天。移植后 1 年生存率为 77.6%。单变量和多变量分析显示,BVS 与 LVS 管理的患者在 HTx 前或后生存方面无统计学差异。与 LVS 管理的患者相比,BVS 管理的患者出血、输血、溶血和肾功能衰竭的发生率更高,而后者组缺血性中风的发生率更高。

结论

在候选者优先排序的情况下,等待时间较短,使用 CentriMag 系统桥接 HTx 是可行的,并且可以获得可接受的支持和移植后结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验