• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心回顾性研究:孤立性动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉腔内血管重建治疗。

Multicenter, retrospective registry of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal arteries treated with endovascular revascularization.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sendai Kousei Hospital, 4-15 Hirose-Cho, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0873, Japan.

Department of Diabetes Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2023 Sep;38(9):1117-1129. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02271-8. Epub 2023 May 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00380-023-02271-8
PMID:37217811
Abstract

Isolated atherosclerotic popliteal lesions (IAPLs) have been considered challenging. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) using the newer devices for IAPLs. This retrospective multicenter registry analyzed patients with lower extremity artery disease having IAPLs who underwent EVT using the newer devices between 2018 and 2021. The primary outcome was primary patency 1 year after EVT. A total of 392 consecutive patients undergoing EVT for IAPLs were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the primary patency and the freedom from target lesion revascularization were 80.9% and 87.8% 1 year after EVT, respectively. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the clinical features that were independently associated with restenosis risk were drug-coated balloon (DCB) use for younger age (< 75 years old; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.08 [95% confidence interval 1.08-8.74]; P = 0.035), non-ambulatory status (2.74 [95% confidence interval 1.56-4.81]; P < 0.001), cilostazol use (0.51 [95% confidence interval 0.29-0.88]; P = 0.015), severe calcification (1.86 [95% confidence interval 1.18-2.94]; P = 0.007), and small external elastic membrane (EEM) area measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (< 30 mm) (2.07 [95% confidence interval 1.19-3.60]; P = 0.010). From the univariate analysis, among patients treated with DCB, younger patients (n = 141) were associated with more comorbidities including smoking (P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), end-stage renal disease (P < 0.001), history of revascularization (P = 0.046) and small EEM area (P = 0.036), compared to older patients (n = 140). Moreover, smaller post-procedural minimum lumen area measured by IVUS after DCB dilatation was observed in younger patients (12 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 4 mm, P = 0.033). This retrospective study demonstrated that the current EVT provided an acceptable 1-year primary patency rate in patients with IAPLs. The primary patency was lower following DCB in younger patients, likely due to the higher rates of comorbidities in this patient population.

摘要

孤立性动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉病变(IAPL)一直被认为是具有挑战性的。本研究旨在探讨使用新型装置进行腘动脉腔内治疗(EVT)的疗效。本回顾性多中心研究分析了 2018 年至 2021 年间使用新型装置治疗 IAPL 的下肢动脉疾病患者。主要结局是 EVT 后 1 年的一期通畅率。共纳入 392 例连续接受 IAPL EVT 的患者。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,EVT 后 1 年的一期通畅率和免于靶病变血运重建率分别为 80.9%和 87.8%。多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析显示,与再狭窄风险相关的临床特征为:年轻(<75 岁)时使用药物涂层球囊(DCB;调整后的危险比,3.08 [95%置信区间 1.08-8.74];P=0.035)、非活动状态(2.74 [95%置信区间 1.56-4.81];P<0.001)、西洛他唑的使用(0.51 [95%置信区间 0.29-0.88];P=0.015)、严重钙化(1.86 [95%置信区间 1.18-2.94];P=0.007)和血管内超声(IVUS)测量的小外弹性膜(EEM)面积(<30mm)(2.07 [95%置信区间 1.19-3.60];P=0.010)。单因素分析显示,在接受 DCB 治疗的患者中,年轻患者(n=141)与更多合并症相关,包括吸烟(P<0.001)、糖尿病(P<0.001)、终末期肾病(P<0.001)、再血管化史(P=0.046)和小 EEM 面积(P=0.036),与老年患者(n=140)相比。此外,年轻患者接受 DCB 扩张后 IVUS 测量的术后最小管腔面积较小(12±4 比 14±4mm,P=0.033)。这项回顾性研究表明,目前的 EVT 为 IAPL 患者提供了可接受的 1 年一期通畅率。年轻患者接受 DCB 治疗后一期通畅率较低,可能是由于该患者人群的合并症发生率较高。

相似文献

1
Multicenter, retrospective registry of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal arteries treated with endovascular revascularization.多中心回顾性研究:孤立性动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉腔内血管重建治疗。
Heart Vessels. 2023 Sep;38(9):1117-1129. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02271-8. Epub 2023 May 23.
2
Clinical Impact of the Size of Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy on Restenosis Rate in Femoropopliteal Lesions.药物涂层球囊治疗尺寸对股腘动脉病变再狭窄率的临床影响。
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Apr;30(2):269-280. doi: 10.1177/15266028221081082. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
3
Angiographic patterns of restenosis after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions and 1-year prognosis after repeat endovascular therapy.药物涂层球囊血管成形术后股腘病变再狭窄的血管造影表现和重复血管内治疗 1 年后的预后。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;102(6):1114-1121. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30856. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
4
Different endovascular modalities of treatment for isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions (EMO-POP) registry.孤立性动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉病变的不同血管内治疗方式(EMO-POP)登记研究
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):231-240.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.170. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Clinical outcomes and predictors of restenosis in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease treated using polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents or drug-coated balloons.使用聚合物涂层紫杉醇洗脱支架或药物涂层球囊治疗的股腘动脉疾病患者的临床结局和再狭窄预测因素。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Apr;37(4):555-566. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01941-9. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
Laser atherectomy and drug-coated balloons for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: 2-Year outcomes.激光动脉粥样切除术和药物涂层球囊治疗股腘段支架内再狭窄:2 年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):439-446. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28636. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
7
Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy vs Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Isolated Popliteal Artery Lesions.抗再狭窄治疗的定向斑块旋切术与单纯药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗孤立性腘动脉病变的比较
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):181-188. doi: 10.1177/1526602816683933. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
8
Two-year clinical outcomes and predictors of restenosis following the use of polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents or drug-coated balloons in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease.应用聚合物涂层紫杉醇洗脱支架或药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉疾病患者的两年临床结果和再狭窄预测因素。
Heart Vessels. 2023 Mar;38(3):429-437. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02182-0. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
9
Three-year outcomes of contemporary endovascular treatment in over 25-cm femoropopliteal artery disease from a retrospective multicenter registry: A retrospective observational study.回顾性多中心登记研究:25cm 以上股腘动脉病变的当代血管内治疗 3 年结果:一项回顾性观察研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;104(4):782-789. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31202. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
10
Stenting performs better than drug-coated balloon angioplasty in popliteal lesions.支架置入术在治疗腘动脉病变方面优于药物涂层球囊血管成形术。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug;78(2):483-489.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.014. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Vessel Patency and Associated Factors of Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesion.股腘动脉病变药物涂层球囊血管通畅率及其相关因素
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jan 3;12(1):e025677. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025677. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
2
Impact of Postoperative Lumen Gain on the Reduction of Restenosis Risk after Endovascular Treatment using Drug-coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions Assessed by Intravascular Ultrasound.血管内超声评估药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉病变后管腔获得对降低再狭窄风险的影响。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Sep 1;30(9):1142-1151. doi: 10.5551/jat.63886. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
3
Comparison Between Clinical Outcomes of Low- and High-Dose Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon in Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Lesion.
紫杉醇药物涂层球囊在股腘动脉病变血管腔内治疗中低剂量与高剂量的临床疗效比较。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 May;46(5):590-597. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03289-7. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
4
Determinants of Drug-Coated Balloon Failure in Patients Undergoing Femoropopliteal Arterial Intervention.股腘动脉介入治疗患者中药物涂层球囊失败的决定因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1241-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.043.
5
Different endovascular modalities of treatment for isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions (EMO-POP) registry.孤立性动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉病变的不同血管内治疗方式(EMO-POP)登记研究
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):231-240.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.170. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
6
Clinical expert consensus document on standards for lower extremity artery disease of imaging modality from the Japan Endovascular Treatment Conference.日本血管腔内治疗学会关于下肢动脉疾病影像学检查方法标准的临床专家共识文件。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Oct;37(4):597-612. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00875-x. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
7
1-Year Outcomes of Fluoropolymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stent in Femoropopliteal Practice: Predictors of Restenosis and Aneurysmal Degeneration.股腘动脉腔内治疗中氟聚合物载药支架 1 年随访结果:再狭窄和瘤样扩张的预测因素。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar 28;15(6):630-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.01.019.
8
Long-term results of the Japanese multicenter Viabahn trial of heparin bonded endovascular stent grafts for long and complex lesions in the superficial femoral artery.日本多中心 Viabahn 试验:肝素结合型覆膜支架治疗股浅动脉长段及复杂病变的长期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Dec;74(6):1958-1967.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.056. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
9
Endarterectomy for Isolated Atherosclerotic Lesions of the Popliteal Artery.腘动脉孤立性动脉粥样硬化病变的动脉内膜切除术
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:631-635. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.091. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
10
Factors Influencing in-Stent Occlusion after Femoropopliteal Artery Stent Placement with Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation.血管内超声评估对股浅动脉支架置入术后支架内闭塞的影响因素。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Feb;31(2):213-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Dec 26.