School of Humanities, Creative Industries and Social Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Community and Health Research Unit, School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Health Sociol Rev. 2023 Nov;32(3):294-310. doi: 10.1080/14461242.2023.2210550. Epub 2023 May 24.
India's public health system aims to foster pluralism by integrating AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy) with mainstream biomedical care. This policy change provides an opportunity to explore the complexity of health system innovation, addressing the relationship between biomedicine and complementary or alternative medicine. Implementing health policy depends on local, societal, and political contexts that shape intervention in practice. This qualitative case study explores contextual features that have influenced AYUSH integration and examines the extent to which practitioners are able to exercise agency in these contexts. Health system stakeholders were interviewed ( = 37) and integration activities observed. The analysis identifies contextual factors in health administration, health facilities, community, and wider society which influence the integration process. In the administrative and facility spheres, pre-existing administrative measures, resource and capacity deficits limit access to AYUSH medicines and opportunities to build relationships between biomedical and AYUSH doctors. At the community and society levels, rural AYUSH acceptance facilitates integration into formal healthcare, while professional organisations and media support integrative processes by holding health services accountable. The findings also demonstrate how, amid these contextual influences, AYUSH doctors navigate the health system hierarchies, despite issues with system knowledge against a background of medical dominance.
印度的公共卫生系统旨在通过将 AYUSH(阿育吠陀、瑜伽和自然疗法、顺势疗法、悉达和顺势疗法)与主流生物医学护理相结合,促进多元化。这一政策变化为探索卫生系统创新的复杂性提供了机会,解决了生物医学和补充或替代医学之间的关系。实施卫生政策取决于塑造实践干预的地方、社会和政治背景。本定性案例研究探讨了影响 AYUSH 整合的背景特征,并研究了从业者在这些背景下能够行使代理权的程度。对卫生系统利益相关者进行了访谈(=37)并观察了整合活动。分析确定了卫生行政、卫生设施、社区和更广泛的社会中影响整合过程的因素。在行政和设施领域,现有的行政措施、资源和能力不足限制了获得 AYUSH 药物的机会,并限制了生物医学和 AYUSH 医生之间建立关系的机会。在社区和社会层面,农村 AYUSH 的接受程度促进了其融入正规医疗保健,而专业组织和媒体通过使卫生服务负责来支持整合过程。研究结果还表明,尽管在医学主导的背景下存在系统知识问题,但 AYUSH 医生如何在这些背景影响下在卫生系统层级中进行导航。