• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管鳞癌患者的淋巴结切除与生存:一项观察性研究。

Resected lymph nodes and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an observational study.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Afliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):2001-2009. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000436.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000436
PMID:37222685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10389544/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer are high. Therefore, the authors aimed to investigate how the number of dissected lymph nodes (LNs) during esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma impacts overall survival (OS), particularly that of patients with positive LNs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 2010 to 2017 were obtained from the Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute Esophageal Cancer Case Management Database. Participants were divided into two groups: patients with negative lymph nodes (N0) and patients with positive lymph nodes (N+). The median number of resected LNs during surgery was 24; therefore, patients with 15-23 and those with 24 or more resected LNs were assigned to subgroups A and B, respectively.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 60.33 months, 1624 patients who underwent esophagectomy were evaluated; 60.53 and 39.47% had a pathological diagnosis of N+ or N0, respectively. The median OS was 33.9 months for the N+ group; however, the N0 group did not achieve the median OS. The mean OS was 84.9 months. In the N+ group, the median OS times of subgroups A and B were 31.2 and 37.1 months, respectively. The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 82, 43, and 34%, respectively, for subgroup A of the N+ group; they were 86, 51, and 38%, respectively, for subgroup B of the N+ group. Subgroups A and B of the N0 group exhibited no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the number of LNs harvested during surgery to 24 or more could improve the OS of patients with positive LNs but not that of patients with negative LNs.

摘要

背景

食管癌的发病率和死亡率都很高。因此,作者旨在研究食管癌根治术中清扫的淋巴结(LNs)数量对总生存(OS)的影响,尤其是对阳性淋巴结(LNs)患者的影响。

材料与方法

本研究的数据来自 2010 年至 2017 年四川省癌症医院和研究所食管癌病例管理数据库。参与者被分为两组:阴性淋巴结(N0)患者和阳性淋巴结(N+)患者。手术中切除的淋巴结中位数为 24 个;因此,15-23 个和 24 个或更多个切除淋巴结的患者分别被分配到亚组 A 和 B。

结果

在中位随访 60.33 个月后,对 1624 例行食管癌切除术的患者进行了评估;病理诊断为 N+和 N0 的患者分别占 60.53%和 39.47%。N+组的中位 OS 为 33.9 个月;然而,N0 组未达到中位 OS。平均 OS 为 84.9 个月。在 N+组中,亚组 A 和 B 的中位 OS 时间分别为 31.2 和 37.1 个月。N+组亚组 A 的 1、3 和 5 年 OS 率分别为 82%、43%和 34%;N+组亚组 B 的 1、3 和 5 年 OS 率分别为 86%、51%和 38%。N0 组的亚组 A 和 B 之间无统计学显著差异。

结论

增加手术中淋巴结的清扫数量至 24 个或更多可以提高阳性淋巴结患者的 OS,但不能提高阴性淋巴结患者的 OS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baae/10389544/d5a9b9044c13/js9-109-2001-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baae/10389544/1ed2d5f749c7/js9-109-2001-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baae/10389544/b9e4b76574aa/js9-109-2001-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baae/10389544/b1d71c8a6158/js9-109-2001-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baae/10389544/d5a9b9044c13/js9-109-2001-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baae/10389544/1ed2d5f749c7/js9-109-2001-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baae/10389544/b9e4b76574aa/js9-109-2001-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baae/10389544/b1d71c8a6158/js9-109-2001-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baae/10389544/d5a9b9044c13/js9-109-2001-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Resected lymph nodes and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an observational study.食管鳞癌患者的淋巴结切除与生存:一项观察性研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):2001-2009. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000436.
2
Impact of first-line chemoimmunotherapy with or without radiotherapy on the prognosis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter, real-world, retrospective cohort study from China (NCT06478355).一线化疗免疫治疗联合或不联合放疗对局部晚期或转移性食管鳞状细胞癌患者预后的影响:一项来自中国的多中心、真实世界、回顾性队列研究(NCT06478355)
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 28;16:1633930. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1633930. eCollection 2025.
3
Optimal lymph node dissection thresholds for early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter study.早期食管鳞状细胞癌的最佳淋巴结清扫阈值:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11822-1.
4
Evaluating the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in cT1b-T2 patients with incidentally discovered positive lymph nodes after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.评估辅助化疗对食管鳞状细胞癌食管切除术后偶然发现淋巴结阳性的cT1b-T2患者的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14472-7.
5
Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes during Esophagectomy Affects the Outcome of Stage III Esophageal Cancer in Patients Having Had Pre-Operative Chemo-Radiation Therapy.食管癌术前放化疗患者中,淋巴结清扫数目影响 III 期食管癌的预后。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 25;31(10):5762-5773. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31100428.
6
A high body mass index in esophageal cancer patients is not associated with adverse outcomes following esophagectomy.食管癌患者的高体重指数与食管切除术后的不良预后无关。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 May;141(5):941-50. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1878-x. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
7
Prognosis of Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy with Thoracic Duct Resection in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.机器人辅助食管癌切除术联合胸导管切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的预后
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17318-5.
8
Clinical implications of selective right paratracheal lymph node dissection in patients with early-stage esophageal Cancer: Propensity score-matched analysis.早期食管癌患者选择性右气管旁淋巴结清扫术的临床意义:倾向评分匹配分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;51(8):110095. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110095. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
9
The survival impact of postoperative complications after curative resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: propensity score-matching analysis.根治性切除术后并发症对食管鳞癌患者生存的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 May;146(5):1351-1360. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03173-2. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
10
Long-term outcomes of intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy: A large-scale propensity score matching analysis.食管癌切除术后胸内吻合与颈部吻合的长期预后:一项大规模倾向评分匹配分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Aug;170(2):391-404.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.12.015. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive risk score of the E-PASS scoring system serves a prognostic indicator for patients after neoadjuvant therapy and curative esophageal cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective study.E-PASS评分系统的综合风险评分可作为新辅助治疗后及食管癌根治性手术后患者的预后指标:一项多中心回顾性研究
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 6;15:1617683. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1617683. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes Between Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging with Indocyanine Green-Guided Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy and Conventional Surgery for Esophageal Cancer.吲哚菁绿引导的近红外荧光成像辅助纵隔淋巴结清扫术与传统手术治疗食管癌的长期疗效比较分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17331-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years for 29 Cancer Groups From 2010 to 2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.2010 年至 2019 年 29 种癌症的发病率、死亡率、生命损失年数、失能生存年数和伤残调整生命年:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;8(3):420-444. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6987.
2
Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment determines survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (NEOCRTEC5010).新辅助治疗后的病理完全缓解决定食管鳞状细胞癌患者的生存情况(NEOCRTEC5010)。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Oct;9(20):1516. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-3331.
3
Inhibition of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase suppresses esophageal squamous cell carcinoma growth and enhances the anti-tumor effects of metformin via the AMPK/mTOR pathway.
6-磷酸葡萄糖酸脱氢酶的抑制通过AMPK/mTOR途径抑制食管鳞状细胞癌生长并增强二甲双胍的抗肿瘤作用。
Mol Cancer. 2025 Mar 26;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02302-0.
4
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index is an effective prognostic predictor for metastatic/recurrent or unresectable esophageal cancer receiving immunotherapy.老年营养风险指数是接受免疫治疗的转移性/复发性或不可切除食管癌的有效预后预测指标。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Feb 28;16(1):1-16. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-722. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
5
Aberrant DNA Methylation in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and its Clinical Implications in Systemic Chemotherapy.食管鳞状细胞癌中的异常DNA甲基化及其在全身化疗中的临床意义
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Feb 3;22(4):1002-1014. doi: 10.7150/ijms.109161. eCollection 2025.
6
Nomogram based on a novel nutritional immune-inflammatory status score to predict postoperative outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.基于一种新型营养免疫炎症状态评分的列线图预测食管鳞状细胞癌术后结局
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 28;31(4):101749. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i4.101749.
7
Comparative analysis of manual vs. mechanical suturing techniques in esophagectomy: A propensity score‑matched study of long‑term outcomes.食管癌切除术中手工缝合与机械缝合技术的对比分析:一项长期结局的倾向评分匹配研究
Oncol Lett. 2024 Nov 11;29(1):51. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14797. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Number of Resected Lymph Nodes and Survival Status in Node-Negative Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cohort Study.无淋巴结转移的食管鳞状细胞癌患者的切除淋巴结数量与生存状态:一项队列研究
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Oct 14;17:4633-4643. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S480893. eCollection 2024.
9
Comparison of three-dimensional vs. two-dimensional assisted thoracoscopy for recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes dissection in esophagectomy: a retrospective study.三维与二维辅助胸腔镜在食管癌手术中喉返神经淋巴结清扫的比较:一项回顾性研究
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02576-z.
10
Long-term outcomes of smoker and drinker with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma after oesophagectomy: a large-scale propensity score matching analysis.食管癌患者术后长期吸烟饮酒与预后的关系:一项大规模倾向评分匹配分析。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 28;11(1):e001452. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001452.
The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2021.
中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO):胃癌诊断与治疗临床诊疗指南,2021 年版。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021 Aug;41(8):747-795. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12193. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
4
Adjuvant Nivolumab in Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.纳武利尤单抗辅助治疗食管或胃食管结合部癌。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 1;384(13):1191-1203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032125.
5
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Preoperative pembrolizumab combined with chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (PALACE-1).术前帕博利珠单抗联合放化疗治疗食管鳞癌(PALACE-1)。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Feb;144:232-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.039. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
7
Esophagectomy With Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial.胸中段和胸下段食管癌行三野与二野淋巴结清扫根治术的比较:一项随机临床试验的长期结果。
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Feb;16(2):310-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.157. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
8
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with positive lymph nodes benefit from extended radical lymphadenectomy.伴有阳性淋巴结的食管鳞状细胞癌患者可从扩大根治性淋巴结清扫术中获益。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Mar;157(3):1275-1283.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.094. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
9
The Number of Negative Lymph Nodes is Positively Associated with Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients in China.在中国,食管鳞状细胞癌患者的阴性淋巴结数量与生存率呈正相关。
Open Med (Wars). 2020 Mar 8;15:152-159. doi: 10.1515/med-2020-0023. eCollection 2020.
10
Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Lymph Node Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus: From the Results of NEOCRTEC5010, a Randomized Multicenter Study.新辅助放化疗后局部晚期食管鳞癌术后淋巴结转移的预后影响:来自 NEOCRTEC5010 的随机多中心研究结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e1022-e1029. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003727.