• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大学本科课程中进行的牙和种植体支持修复体 13 至 15 年后的临床结果。

Clinical Outcomes of Tooth- and Implant- Supported Restorations Performed in a University-Based Undergraduate Program After 13 to 15 Years.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2024 Jun 21(3):261-270. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8264.

DOI:10.11607/ijp.8264
PMID:37222706
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical concept of patient treatment with fixed tooth- and implant-supported restorations in a university-based undergraduate program after 13 to 15 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 30 patients (mean age 56 years) who had received multiple tooth- and implant-supported restorations were recalled after 13 to 15 years. The clinical assessment comprised biologic and technical parameters as well as patient satisfaction. Data were analyzed descriptively, and the 13- to 15-year survival rates for tooth- and implant-supported single crowns and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The survival rate of tooth-supported restorations amounted to 88.3% (single crowns) and 69.6% (FDPs); in implants, it reached 100% for all types of restorations. Overall, 92.4% of all restorations were free of technical complications. The most common technical complication was chipping of the veneering ceramic (tooth-supported restorations: 5.5%; implant-supported restorations: 13% to 15.9%) regardless of the material used. For tooth-supported restorations, increased probing depth ≥ 5 mm was the most frequent biologic complication (22.8%), followed by endodontic complications of root canal-treated teeth (14%) and loss of vitality at abutment teeth (8.2%). Peri-implantitis was diagnosed in 10.2% of implants.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the clinical concept implemented in the undergraduate program and performed by undergraduate students works well. The clinical outcomes are similar to those reported in the literature. In general, the majority of biologic complications occur in reconstructed teeth, whereas implant-supported restorations are more prone to technical complications.

摘要

目的

评估经过 13 至 15 年的大学本科课程后,使用固定牙和种植体支持修复体对患者进行治疗的临床概念。

材料与方法

共召回 30 名(平均年龄 56 岁)接受过多种牙和种植体支持修复体的患者,时间为 13 至 15 年后。临床评估包括生物学和技术参数以及患者满意度。数据采用描述性分析,计算牙和种植体支持的单冠和固定义齿(FDP)的 13 至 15 年生存率。

结果

牙支持修复体的存活率为 88.3%(单冠)和 69.6%(FDP);在种植体中,所有类型的修复体的存活率均达到 100%。总体而言,所有修复体中有 92.4%无技术并发症。最常见的技术并发症是贴面陶瓷的碎裂(牙支持修复体:5.5%;种植体支持修复体:13%至 15.9%),无论使用何种材料。对于牙支持修复体,最常见的生物学并发症是探诊深度增加≥5mm(22.8%),其次是根管治疗牙的根管并发症(14%)和基牙活力丧失(8.2%)。在 10.2%的种植体中诊断出种植体周围炎。

结论

本研究结果表明,本科课程中实施的临床概念以及由本科生执行的临床概念效果良好。临床结果与文献报道相似。一般来说,大多数生物学并发症发生在重建牙中,而种植体支持的修复体更容易出现技术并发症。

相似文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Tooth- and Implant- Supported Restorations Performed in a University-Based Undergraduate Program After 13 to 15 Years.在大学本科课程中进行的牙和种植体支持修复体 13 至 15 年后的临床结果。
Int J Prosthodont. 2024 Jun 21(3):261-270. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8264.
2
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of patients receiving both tooth- and implant-supported prosthodontic treatment after 5 years of function.5 年功能后接受牙支持和种植体支持修复治疗的患者的临床和影像学评估。
Int J Prosthodont. 2012 May-Jun;25(3):252-9.
3
Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results.牙或种植体支持的贴面氧化锆单冠的临床性能:42 个月的结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Dec;23(12):4301-4309. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02878-0. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up.固位型修复体支持的锁定锥度种植体的存活率和并发症发生率:一项 1 至 10 年随访的前瞻性研究。
J Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;23(6):434-44. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12152. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
5
A 1-year randomised controlled trial comparing zirconia versus metal-ceramic implant supported single-tooth restorations.一项为期1年的随机对照试验,比较氧化锆与金属陶瓷种植体支持的单颗牙修复体。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011 Winter;4(4):347-61.
6
A 3-year prospective study of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic materials in patients with tooth agenesis.一项针对牙齿发育不全患者的全陶瓷和金属陶瓷材料种植体支持单颗牙修复的3年前瞻性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Oct;24(10):1078-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02514.x. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
7
Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).牙支持式固定义齿(FDPs)、种植体支持式FDPs及单冠(SCs)的生存率和并发症发生率比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:97-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x.
8
Ten-year survival and complication rates of lithium-disilicate (Empress 2) tooth-supported crowns, implant-supported crowns, and fixed dental prostheses.二硅酸锂(Empress 2)牙支持式冠、种植体支持式冠及固定义齿的十年生存率和并发症发生率
J Dent. 2017 Jan;56:65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
9
Tooth-implant-supported posterior fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks: 3-year clinical result.氧化锆支架的牙种植体支持的后牙固定义齿:3年临床结果
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jun;20(5):1079-86. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1594-1. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
10
Clinical outcomes of zirconia-based implant- and tooth-supported single crowns.基于氧化锆的种植体和牙支持单冠的临床疗效。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jan;20(1):169-78. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1479-3. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative outcomes of endodontically treated teeth versus dental implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review.根管治疗牙齿与牙种植体支持的修复体的比较结果:一项系统评价
Acta Odontol Scand. 2025 Jun 24;84:386-396. doi: 10.2340/aos.v84.43871.