• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论住院医师和学术医学推荐信中的性别偏见:系统综述。

Gender bias in reference letters for residency and academic medicine: a systematic review.

机构信息

University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 2023 May 22;99(1170):272-278. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140045.

DOI:10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140045
PMID:37222712
Abstract

Reference letters play an important role for both postgraduate residency applications and medical faculty hiring processes. This study seeks to characterise the ways in which gender bias may manifest in the language of reference letters in academic medicine. In particular, we conducted a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO from database inception to July 2020 for original studies that assessed gendered language in medical reference letters for residency applications and medical faculty hiring. A total of 16 studies, involving 12 738 letters of recommendation written for 7074 applicants, were included. A total of 32% of applicants were women. There were significant differences in how women were described in reference letters. A total of 64% (7/11) studies found a significant difference in gendered adjectives between men and women. Among the 7 studies, a total of 86% (6/7) noted that women applicants were more likely to be described using communal adjectives, such as "delightful" or "compassionate", while men applicants were more likely to be described using agentic adjectives, such as "leader" or "exceptional". Several studies noted that reference letters for women applicants had more frequent use of doubt raisers and mentions of applicant personal life and/or physical appearance. Only one study assessed the outcome of gendered language on application success, noting a higher residency match rate for men applicants. Reference letters within medicine and medical education exhibit language discrepancies between men and women applicants, which may contribute to gender bias against women in medicine.

摘要

推荐信对于研究生住院医师申请和医学教师招聘过程都很重要。本研究旨在描述性别偏见在学术医学推荐信中的语言表达上可能表现出的方式。具体来说,我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行了系统回顾。我们从数据库建立到 2020 年 7 月在 Embase、MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO 中搜索了评估住院医师申请和医学教师招聘中推荐信的性别语言的原始研究。共纳入 16 项研究,涉及 7074 名申请人的 12738 封推荐信。申请人中共有 32%为女性。推荐信中对女性的描述存在显著差异。共有 64%(7/11)的研究发现男性和女性之间推荐信中的性别形容词存在显著差异。在这 7 项研究中,共有 86%(6/7)指出女性申请人更有可能被描述为具有集体形容词,如“令人愉快”或“富有同情心”,而男性申请人更有可能被描述为具有代理形容词,如“领导者”或“杰出”。一些研究指出,女性申请人的推荐信更频繁地使用疑问词、提及申请人的个人生活和/或外貌。只有一项研究评估了性别语言对申请成功的影响,指出男性申请人的住院医师匹配率更高。医学和医学教育中的推荐信存在男女申请人之间的语言差异,这可能导致医学领域对女性的性别偏见。

相似文献

1
Gender bias in reference letters for residency and academic medicine: a systematic review.论住院医师和学术医学推荐信中的性别偏见:系统综述。
Postgrad Med J. 2023 May 22;99(1170):272-278. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140045.
2
Do gender and racial differences exist in letters of recommendation for obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants?推荐信中是否存在妇产科住院医师申请人的性别和种族差异?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):554.e1-554.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.033. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
3
Are There Gender-based Differences in Language in Letters of Recommendation to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program?推荐信中的语言是否存在性别差异?——以骨科住院医师项目为例
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1400-1408. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001053.
4
Influence of Gender on Surgical Residency Applicants' Recommendation Letters.性别对外科住院医师申请人推荐信的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):356-365.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.020. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
5
The Role of Gender in Neurosurgical Residency Applicants' Letters of Recommendation.性别在神经外科住院医师申请人推荐信中的作用。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Aug 16;89(3):504-508. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab223.
6
Assessment of gender differences in letters of recommendation for pharmacy residency applicants.评估药剂学住院医师申请人推荐信中的性别差异。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021 Jun 7;78(12):1118-1125. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab150.
7
Linguistic Analysis of Letters of Recommendation for Vascular Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology Applicants Detects Differences in Attributable Strengths Based on Gender.基于性别的推荐信语言分析:血管外科和妇产科申请人的归因优势差异。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Sep-Oct;78(5):1535-1543. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
8
Language Patterns in Letters of Recommendation for Residency Applicants in Otolaryngology.耳鼻喉科住院医师申请人推荐信中的语言模式。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Mar;170(3):821-827. doi: 10.1002/ohn.592. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
9
Gender and Racial Bias in Radiology Residency Letters of Recommendation.影像学住院医师推荐信中的性别和种族偏见。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jan;17(1 Pt A):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Linguistic Differences by Gender in Letters of Recommendation for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fellowship Applicants.母胎医学专科住院医师申请推荐信中的性别语言差异
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1955-e1961. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770148. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Recommendation letter language for applicants selected to interview at integrated cardiothoracic surgery residency: A qualitative assessment by gender.综合心胸外科住院医师面试入选申请者推荐信语言:基于性别的定性评估
JTCVS Open. 2024 Dec 4;23:379-385. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.12.001. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Artificial Intelligence Meets Holistic Review: Promises and Pitfalls of Automating the Medical Education Admissions Process.人工智能与全面评估:医学教育招生流程自动化的前景与陷阱
Acad Med. 2025 May 1;100(5):541-546. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005964. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Evaluating equity, diversity, and inclusion in Canadian Postgraduate Medical Education: A cross-sectional analysis of online content.
评估加拿大研究生医学教育中的公平性、多样性和包容性:在线内容的横断面分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 27;19(8):e0307584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307584. eCollection 2024.
4
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: How Prominent Are Gender Bias, Racial Bias, and Score Inflation in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Recommendation Letters? A Systematic Review.编辑聚焦/五分钟速览:骨科住院医师推荐信中的性别偏见、种族偏见和分数膨胀现象有多显著?一项系统综述。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jun 1;482(6):912-915. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003078. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
5
Evaluating implicit gender bias at Canadian otolaryngology meetings through use of professional title.通过使用专业头衔评估加拿大耳鼻喉科会议上的隐性性别偏见。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar 27;10(1):12-17. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.96. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
What's in a Name? Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in Recommendation Letters Generated by ChatGPT.名字里的乾坤:ChatGPT 生成的推荐信中的性别偏见的实验证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 5;26:e51837. doi: 10.2196/51837.
7
Gender Differences in Work-Based Assessment Scores and Narrative Comments After Direct Observation.基于工作的评估分数和直接观察后的叙述性评论中的性别差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(10):1795-1802. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08645-6. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
8
A Systematic Review of Metrics Utilized in the Selection and Prediction of Future Performance of Residents in the United States.美国住院医师未来表现选择和预测指标的系统评价
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Dec;15(6):652-668. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00955.1.
9
Examination of residency program websites for the use of gendered language and imagery.考察住院医师培训项目网站对性别语言和形象的使用。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 26;23(1):697. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04677-4.
10
Resident Operative Autonomy and Attending Verbal Feedback Differ by Resident and Attending Gender.住院医师的手术自主权和上级医师的口头反馈因住院医师和上级医师的性别而异。
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Feb 2;4(1):e256. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000256. eCollection 2023 Mar.