Jin Joy Q, Spencer Riley K, Reddy Vidhatha, Bhutani Tina, Liao Wilson
School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Dermatology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 May 18;19:413-423. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S388324. eCollection 2023.
INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated skin condition with significant detriments to physical/mental health. While systemic therapies are available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, patients can experience therapeutic failure, loss of efficacy, or medical contraindications that require other therapeutic options. OBJECTIVE: With the recent approval of deucravacitinib, a first-in-class TYK2 small molecule inhibitor administered orally for psoriasis patients, we reviewed data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to synthesize its clinical utility. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of deucravacitinib comparing its clinical efficacy to placebo in psoriasis. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify RCTs studying deucravacitinib in human patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. RESULTS: One placebo-controlled Phase II RCT and two placebo-controlled/active-comparator Phase III RCTs were included for review. Patients (N=1953) treated with deucravacitinib 6 mg daily showed marked improvement in disease severity (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) and quality-of-life outcomes compared to patients administered comparator (apremilast) and placebo. Clinical improvement given deucravacitinib was noted for scalp psoriasis but not fingernail psoriasis. Meta-analysis (deucravacitinib, n=888; placebo, n=466) comparing rates of clearance (sPGA 0/1) demonstrated superior efficacy of deucravacitinib compared to placebo (odds ratio, 12.87; 95% confidence interval, 8.97-18.48; =4.08, I=51%). Deucravacitinib was well-tolerated, with similar rate of occurrence and type of adverse events reported among patients treated with placebo or apremilast at Week 12-16. No cardiovascular events, serious infections, or lab abnormalities were noted. CONCLUSION: Deucravacitinib possesses good efficacy, with no report of safety concerns associated with prior JAK inhibitors used for psoriasis. Meta-analysis demonstrated deucravacitinib's superiority compared to placebo, indicating its promising clinical utility. Further studies are needed to observe long-term safety and efficacy, and to compare deucravacitinib to existing treatments.
引言:银屑病是一种慢性免疫介导的皮肤病,对身心健康有显著损害。虽然有全身治疗方法可用于治疗中度至重度银屑病,但患者可能会经历治疗失败、疗效丧失或出现需要其他治疗选择的医学禁忌证。 目的:随着首款用于银屑病患者的口服一流TYK2小分子抑制剂氘可来昔替尼(deucravacitinib)最近获批,我们回顾了随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,以综合其临床效用。据我们所知,这是第一项比较氘可来昔替尼与安慰剂在银屑病临床疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。 方法:在PubMed(MEDLINE)、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中央登记册中进行文献检索,以确定在中度至重度银屑病患者中研究氘可来昔替尼的RCT。 结果:纳入一项安慰剂对照的II期RCT和两项安慰剂对照/活性对照的III期RCT进行综述。与接受对照药物(阿普米司特)和安慰剂治疗的患者相比,每日服用6mg氘可来昔替尼治疗的患者(N=1953)在疾病严重程度(银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)、静态医师整体评估(sPGA)和生活质量结果方面有显著改善。氘可来昔替尼对头皮银屑病有临床改善作用,但对指甲银屑病无效。比较清除率(sPGA 0/1)的荟萃分析(氘可来昔替尼,n=888;安慰剂,n=466)表明,与安慰剂相比,氘可来昔替尼疗效更佳(优势比,12.87;95%置信区间,8.97-18.48;P<0.001,I²=51%)。氘可来昔替尼耐受性良好,在第12-16周接受安慰剂或阿普米司特治疗的患者中,不良事件的发生率和类型相似。未观察到心血管事件、严重感染或实验室异常。 结论:氘可来昔替尼疗效良好,未报告与先前用于银屑病的JAK抑制剂相关的安全问题。荟萃分析表明,与安慰剂相比,氘可来昔替尼具有优越性,表明其具有良好的临床效用。需要进一步研究以观察其长期安全性和疗效,并将氘可来昔替尼与现有治疗方法进行比较。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023-5-18
Skin Res Technol. 2024-8
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022-2
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2024-12-26
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024-4
Int J Mol Sci. 2023-12-21
Drugs. 2022-11
N Engl J Med. 2022-1-27
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022-2
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022-3