Internal Medicine, Immunology and Allergology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Intern Med. 2023 Sep;115:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.05.022. Epub 2023 May 22.
Blood transfusion is one of the most overused procedures, especially in elderly patients. Despite the current transfusion guidelines recommending a restrictive transfusion strategy in stable patients, the clinical practice varies according to physicians' experience and implementation of patient blood management. This study aimed to evaluate the anemia management and transfusion strategy in anemic elderly hospitalized and the impact of an educational program. We enrolled ≥ 65-year-old patients who presented or developed anemia during admission to a tertiary hospital's internal medicine and geriatric units. Patients with onco-hematological disorders, hemoglobinopathies and active bleeding were excluded. In the first phase, anemia management was monitored. In the second phase, the six participating units were divided into two groups and two arms: Educational (Edu) and non-educational (NE). During this phase, physicians in the Edu arm underwent an educational program for the appropriate use of transfusion and anemia management. In the third phase, anemia management was monitored. Comorbidities, demographic and hematological characteristics were similar in all phases and arms. The percentages of transfused patients during phase 1 were 27.7% in NE and 18.5% in the Edu arm. During phase 3, it decreased to 21.4% in the NE and 13.6% in the Edu arm. Hemoglobin levels at discharge and after 30 days were higher in the Edu group despite reduced use of blood transfusion. In conclusion, a more restrictive strategy was comparable or superior to the more liberal one in terms of clinical outcomes, with the advantage of saving red blood cell units and reducing related side effects.
输血是最常用的治疗方法之一,尤其是在老年患者中。尽管目前的输血指南建议在稳定的患者中采用限制性输血策略,但临床实践因医生的经验和患者血液管理的实施而有所不同。本研究旨在评估贫血老年住院患者的贫血管理和输血策略,以及教育计划的影响。我们招募了≥65 岁的患者,这些患者在入住一家三级医院的内科和老年科病房时或在住院期间出现贫血。排除患有肿瘤血液病、血红蛋白病和正在出血的患者。在第一阶段,监测贫血管理。在第二阶段,将 6 个参与单位分为两组和两个分支:教育(Edu)和非教育(NE)。在这一阶段,Edu 组的医生接受了关于输血和贫血管理的适当使用的教育计划。在第三阶段,监测贫血管理。所有阶段和分支的合并症、人口统计学和血液学特征相似。在第一阶段,NE 组的输血患者比例为 27.7%,Edu 组为 18.5%。在第三阶段,NE 组降至 21.4%,Edu 组降至 13.6%。尽管输血减少,但 Edu 组的出院时和 30 天后的血红蛋白水平更高。总之,在临床结果方面,更严格的策略与更宽松的策略相当或更优,其优点是节省红细胞单位并减少相关的副作用。