• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌生物标志物的保险覆盖范围。

Insurer coverage of prostate cancer biomarkers.

机构信息

Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2023 Jul;41(7):324.e9-324.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.04.020. Epub 2023 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.04.020
PMID:37225635
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several recently-developed prostate cancer (CaP) biomarkers are recommended per national guidelines, yet feasibility of obtaining these tests is unknown. We used a national database to assess insurance coverage of CaP biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Insurance policies regarding 4K Score, ExoDx, My Prostate Score, Prostate Cancer Antigen 3, Prostate Health Index, and SelectMDx as of January 1, 2022 were extracted from the policy reporter database. Coverage was defined as a biomarker being deemed medically necessary, conditionally covered, or covered with prior authorization. Overall rates of biomarker coverage were compared by insurance type and region using Chi-squared test. SelectMDx was not covered by any queried policies and was omitted from analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 186 insurance plans were identified among 131 payers. Of the 186 plans, 109 (59%) covered at least one biomarker, with prior authorization required for 38 (35%) of these plans. Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 and 4K Score had higher rates of coverage compared to ExoDx, Prostate Health Index, and My Prostate Score (52% and 43% vs. 26%, 26%, and 5%, respectively, P < 0.01). Medicare plans had higher rates of coverage compared to non-Medicare plans (80% Medicare vs. 17% commercial, 15% federal employer, and 13% Medicaid, P < 0.01), and nationwide plans had higher coverage rates compared to regional plans (43% nationwide vs. 32% midwest, 27% northeast, 25% south, 24% west, P < 0.01). Covered biomarkers under Medicare plans were less likely to require prior authorization compared to those covered by non-Medicare plans (12% Medicare vs. 63% commercial, 100% federal employer, 70% Medicaid, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Coverage of novel CaP biomarkers are relatively robust for Medicare plans but sparse for non-Medicare plans, with the majority of non-Medicare plans requiring prior authorization. Non-Medicare eligible men may face significant barriers to obtaining these tests.

摘要

简介

国家指南建议使用几种新开发的前列腺癌(CaP)生物标志物,但获得这些检测的可行性尚不清楚。我们使用国家数据库评估 CaP 生物标志物的保险覆盖范围。

材料和方法

截至 2022 年 1 月 1 日,从政策报告数据库中提取了有关 4K Score、ExoDx、My Prostate Score、前列腺癌抗原 3、前列腺健康指数和 SelectMDx 的保险政策。将生物标志物被视为医学必需、有条件覆盖或有事先授权覆盖的情况定义为覆盖。使用卡方检验比较不同保险类型和地区的生物标志物覆盖总体率。由于 SelectMDx 未被任何查询的政策涵盖,因此未包含在分析中。

结果

在 131 家支付方中,共确定了 186 份保险计划。在这 186 个计划中,有 109 个(59%)覆盖了至少一种生物标志物,其中 38 个(35%)计划需要事先授权。与 ExoDx、前列腺健康指数和 My Prostate Score 相比,前列腺癌抗原 3 和 4K Score 的覆盖率更高(分别为 52%和 43%,而分别为 26%、26%和 5%,P < 0.01)。与非医疗保险计划相比,医疗保险计划的覆盖率更高(医疗保险 80%,商业保险 17%,联邦雇主保险 15%,医疗补助保险 13%,P < 0.01),与区域计划相比,全国性计划的覆盖率更高(全国性计划 43%,中西部地区 32%,东北地区 27%,南部地区 25%,西部地区 24%,P < 0.01)。与非医疗保险计划相比,医疗保险计划下覆盖的生物标志物不太可能需要事先授权(医疗保险 12%,商业保险 63%,联邦雇主保险 100%,医疗补助保险 70%,P < 0.01)。

结论

对于医疗保险计划,新型 CaP 生物标志物的覆盖范围相对广泛,但对于非医疗保险计划则很少,大多数非医疗保险计划都需要事先授权。非医疗保险合格男性可能在获得这些检测方面面临重大障碍。

相似文献

1
Insurer coverage of prostate cancer biomarkers.前列腺癌生物标志物的保险覆盖范围。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Jul;41(7):324.e9-324.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.04.020. Epub 2023 May 23.
2
Coverage of Novel Therapeutic Agents by Medicare Prescription Drug Plans Following FDA Approval.医疗保险处方药计划在 FDA 批准后对新治疗药物的覆盖范围。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Dec;24(12):1230-1238. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.12.1230.
3
Coverage of Nonpharmacologic Treatments for Low Back Pain Among US Public and Private Insurers.美国公共和私人保险公司对腰痛非药物治疗的覆盖情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3044.
4
Prescription Drug Coverage for Treatment of Low Back Pain Among US Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and Commercial Insurers.美国医疗补助计划、医疗保险优势计划和商业保险公司治疗腰痛的处方药覆盖范围。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0235.
5
The cost burden of metastatic prostate cancer in the US populations covered by employer-sponsored health insurance.在美国,雇主赞助的健康保险覆盖人群中转移性前列腺癌的费用负担。
Cancer. 2023 Oct 15;129(20):3252-3262. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34905. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
6
Variations in Medical Necessity Determinations Across Commercial Insurance Carriers for Prostate Cancer Procedures.商业保险公司之间前列腺癌手术医疗必要性判定的差异。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Jan 1;115(1):34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1839. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
7
Federal and Statewide Coverage for Opioid-Sparing Chronic Pain Treatments.阿片类药物节省型慢性疼痛治疗的联邦和全州范围覆盖情况。
Pain Physician. 2022 Dec;25(9):E1457-E1466.
8
Variation in Medicaid and commercial payer coverage of aducanumab for Alzheimer's disease.医疗补助计划和商业支付方对阿杜卡奴单抗治疗阿尔茨海默病的覆盖范围存在差异。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Aug;19(8):3654-3669. doi: 10.1002/alz.12965. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
9
Association of State-Level Medicaid Expansion With Treatment of Patients With Higher-Risk Prostate Cancer.州级医疗补助扩张与高危前列腺癌患者治疗的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2015198. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15198.
10
Measuring the Scope of Prior Authorization Policies: Applying Private Insurer Rules to Medicare Part B.测量预先授权政策的范围:将私人保险公司的规定应用于医疗保险 B 部分。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 May 28;2(5):e210859. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0859. eCollection 2021 May.