Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 , HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;200(2):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06965-5. Epub 2023 May 25.
ESR1 mutations have been identified as mechanism for endocrine resistance and are also associated with a decreased overall survival. We assessed ESR1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for impact on outcome to taxane-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer patients.
ESR1 mutations were determined in archived plasma samples from patients treated with paclitaxel and bevacizumab (AT arm, N = 91) in the randomized phase II ATX study. Samples collected at baseline (n = 51) and at cycle 2 (n = 13, C2) were analyzed using a breast cancer next-generation sequencing panel. This study was powered to detect a benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) at six months for patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab compared to historical trials with fulvestrant. PFS, overall survival (OS), and ctDNA dynamics were exploratory analyses.
PFS at six months was 86% (18/21) in patients with an ESR1 mutation detected and 85% (23/27) in wildtype ESR1 patients. In our exploratory analysis, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months [95% CI, 7.6-8.8] for ESR1 mutant patients versus 8.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.3-9.2] for ESR1 wildtype patients [p = 0.47]. The median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months [95% CI, 6.6-33.7] for ESR1 mutant patients versus 28.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.3-36.9] for ESR1 wildtype patients [p = 0.27]. Patients with ≥ two ESR1 mutations had a significantly worse OS, but not PFS, compared to those who did not [p = 0.003]. Change in ctDNA level at C2 was not different between ESR1 and other mutations.
Presence of ESR1 mutations in baseline ctDNA might not be associated with inferior PFS and OS in advanced breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab.
已经发现 ESR1 突变是内分泌耐药的机制,并且与总生存时间降低有关。我们评估了循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)中的 ESR1 突变对紫杉醇为基础化疗在晚期乳腺癌患者中的疗效的影响。
在 ATX 研究的随机 II 期试验中,对接受紫杉醇和贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者(AT 组,N=91)的存档血浆样本进行了 ESR1 突变检测。使用乳腺癌下一代测序试剂盒分析基线(n=51)和第 2 周期(n=13,C2)时的样本。本研究的目的是检测与历史上使用氟维司群相比,紫杉醇/贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者在 6 个月时无进展生存期(PFS)的获益。PFS、总生存期(OS)和 ctDNA 动态为探索性分析。
在检测到 ESR1 突变的患者中,6 个月时的 PFS 为 86%(18/21),而在 ESR1 野生型患者中为 85%(23/27)。在我们的探索性分析中,ESR1 突变患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 8.2 个月[95%置信区间(CI):7.6-8.8],而 ESR1 野生型患者为 8.7 个月[95%CI:8.3-9.2](p=0.47)。ESR1 突变患者的中位总生存期(OS)为 20.7 个月[95%CI:6.6-33.7],而 ESR1 野生型患者为 28.1 个月[95%CI:19.3-36.9](p=0.27)。与未发生 ESR1 突变的患者相比,≥2 个 ESR1 突变的患者 OS 显著更差,但 PFS 无差异[p=0.003]。C2 时 ctDNA 水平的变化在 ESR1 突变和其他突变之间没有差异。
在接受紫杉醇/贝伐珠单抗治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者中,基线 ctDNA 中存在 ESR1 突变可能与 PFS 和 OS 无差异。