• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 CCTG LY.12 试验中的癌症治疗相关的接触天数。

Contact Days Associated With Cancer Treatments in the CCTG LY.12 Trial.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2023 Sep 7;28(9):799-803. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad128.

DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyad128
PMID:37226534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10485297/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

When cancer treatments have similar oncologic outcomes, the number of days with in-person healthcare contact (""contact days'') can help contextualize expected time use with each treatment. We assessed contact days in a completed randomized clinical trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of the CCTG LY.12 RCT that evaluated 2-3 cycles of gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) vs. dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) in 619 patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma prior to stem cell transplant. Primary analyses reported similar response rates and survival. We calculated patient-level "contact days" by analyzing trial forms. The study period was from assignment to progression or transplant. Days without healthcare contact were considered "home days''. We compared measures of contact days across arms.

RESULTS

The study period was longer in the GDP arm (median 50, vs. 47 days, P = .007). Contact days were comparable in both arms (median 18 vs 19, P = 0.79), but home days were higher in the GDP arm (median 33 vs 28, P < .001). The proportion of contact days was lower in the GDP arm (34%, vs. 38%, P = .009). The GDP arm experienced more contact days related to planned outpatient chemotherapy (median, 10 vs. 8 days), but the DHAP arm experienced many more inpatient contact days (median, 11 vs. 0 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of time use, such as contact days, can be extracted from RCTs. In LY.12, despite comparable oncologic outcomes, GDP was associated with fewer contact days. Such information can guide decision-making for patients with hematological cancers, who already face significant healthcare contact.

摘要

背景

当癌症治疗的肿瘤学结果相似时,与治疗相关的实际医疗接触天数(“接触天数”)可以帮助了解每种治疗方法的预期时间。我们评估了一项已完成的随机临床试验中的接触天数。

患者和方法

我们对 CCTG LY.12 RCT 进行了二次分析,该试验评估了 619 例复发/难治性淋巴瘤患者在干细胞移植前接受 2-3 周期吉西他滨、地塞米松和顺铂(GDP)与地塞米松、阿糖胞苷和顺铂(DHAP)的情况。主要分析报告了相似的缓解率和生存率。我们通过分析试验表格计算了患者水平的“接触天数”。研究期间从分配到进展或移植。没有医疗接触的天数被认为是“在家天数”。我们比较了不同手臂的接触天数。

结果

GDP 组的研究期较长(中位数 50 天 vs. 47 天,P=0.007)。两个治疗组的接触天数相似(中位数 18 天 vs. 19 天,P=0.79),但 GDP 组的在家天数更高(中位数 33 天 vs. 28 天,P<0.001)。GDP 组的接触天数比例较低(34% vs. 38%,P=0.009)。GDP 组与计划门诊化疗相关的接触天数较多(中位数 10 天 vs. 8 天),而 DHAP 组的住院接触天数更多(中位数 11 天 vs. 0 天)。

结论

从 RCT 中可以提取出时间使用等措施,例如接触天数。在 LY.12 中,尽管肿瘤学结果相似,但 GDP 与接触天数较少相关。这些信息可以为患有血液系统癌症的患者提供决策指导,他们已经面临大量的医疗接触。

相似文献

1
Contact Days Associated With Cancer Treatments in the CCTG LY.12 Trial.与 CCTG LY.12 试验中的癌症治疗相关的接触天数。
Oncologist. 2023 Sep 7;28(9):799-803. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad128.
2
Gemcitabine/dexamethasone/cisplatin vs cytarabine/dexamethasone/cisplatin for relapsed or refractory aggressive-histology lymphoma: cost-utility analysis of NCIC CTG LY.12.吉西他滨/地塞米松/顺铂与阿糖胞苷/地塞米松/顺铂治疗复发或难治性侵袭性组织学淋巴瘤:NCIC CTG LY.12 的成本效用分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Apr 13;107(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv106. Print 2015 Jul.
3
Randomized comparison of gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin versus dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin chemotherapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory aggressive lymphomas: NCIC-CTG LY.12.随机比较吉西他滨、地塞米松和顺铂与地塞米松、阿糖胞苷和顺铂化疗在自体造血干细胞移植治疗复发和难治性侵袭性淋巴瘤中的作用:NCIC-CTG LY.12.
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3490-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.9593. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
4
Salvage chemotherapy of gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) for patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas: a consortium for improving survival of lymphoma (CISL) trial.吉西他滨、地塞米松和顺铂(GDP)挽救性化疗用于复发或难治性外周T细胞淋巴瘤患者:淋巴瘤生存改善联盟(CISL)试验
Ann Hematol. 2015 Nov;94(11):1845-51. doi: 10.1007/s00277-015-2468-y. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
5
Similar response rates and superior early progression-free survival with gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin salvage therapy compared with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan salvage therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for recurrent or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.与卡莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷和美法仑挽救疗法相比,吉西他滨、地塞米松和顺铂挽救疗法在复发性或难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤自体干细胞移植前具有相似的缓解率和更优的早期无进展生存期。
Cancer. 2006 Jan 15;106(2):353-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21587.
6
Treatment outcomes for older patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma receiving salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation are similar to younger patients: a subgroup analysis from the phase III CCTG LY.12 trial.对于接受挽救性化疗和自体干细胞移植的复发/难治性侵袭性淋巴瘤老年患者,其治疗结果与年轻患者相似:来自 III 期 CCTG LY.12 试验的亚组分析。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):622-627. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw653.
7
[Efficacy of GDP regimen (gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin) on relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: a report of 24 cases].GDP方案(吉西他滨、地塞米松和顺铂)治疗复发或难治性侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效:附24例报告
Ai Zheng. 2008 Nov;27(11):1222-5.
8
Gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin (GDP) is an effective and well-tolerated mobilization regimen for relapsed and refractory lymphoma: a single center experience.吉西他滨、地塞米松和顺铂(GDP)是一种有效且耐受性良好的复发/难治性淋巴瘤动员方案:单中心经验。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Apr 30;51(2):685-692. doi: 10.3906/sag-2008-114.
9
Study on effectiveness of gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) for relapsed or refractory AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.吉西他滨、地塞米松和顺铂(GDP)治疗复发或难治性艾滋病相关非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效研究。
Ann Hematol. 2012 Nov;91(11):1757-63. doi: 10.1007/s00277-012-1518-y. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
10
Mitoxantrone-DHAP with GM-CSF: an active but myelosuppressive salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.米托蒽醌-DHAP联合粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子:一种用于复发/难治性侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的有效但有骨髓抑制作用的挽救疗法。
Leuk Lymphoma. 1999 Nov;35(5-6):527-36. doi: 10.1080/10428199909169617.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of health care contact days with economic measures in the CCTG LY.12 trial.在加拿大临床试验组LY.12试验中,医疗接触天数与经济指标的关联。
Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf165.
2
"The Cancer is My Life": patient and caregiver perceptions of the time toxicity of palliative systemic cancer treatments for advanced gastrointestinal cancers.“癌症即我的生活”:患者及照料者对晚期胃肠道癌症姑息性全身癌症治疗时间毒性的认知
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 10;33(7):564. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09621-4.
3
Health Care Contact Days for Older Adults Enrolled in Cancer Clinical Trials.参加癌症临床试验的老年人的医疗接触天数。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250778. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0778.
4
"The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home.“最大的挑战在于没有常规可言”:一项关于居家癌症护理时间负担的定性研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jan 27;33(2):80. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09132-8.
5
Time's up: the urgency to investigate time toxicity in patients with genitourinary malignancies.时间到了:研究泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤患者时间毒性的紧迫性。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Dec 11;16:17588359241305088. doi: 10.1177/17588359241305088. eCollection 2024.
6
Time toxicity in cancer care: A concept analysis using Walker and Avant's method.癌症护理中的时间毒性:运用沃克和阿凡特方法的概念分析
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct 23;11(12):100610. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100610. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on the Time Burdens of Cancer Care.患者、照护者和临床医生对癌症护理时间负担的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2447649. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47649.
8
Patients' considerations of time toxicity when assessing cancer treatments with marginal benefit.患者在评估具有边际获益的癌症治疗时对时间毒性的考虑。
Oncologist. 2024 Nov 4;29(11):978-985. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae187.
9
Reporting time toxicity in prospective cancer clinical trials: A scoping review.前瞻性癌症临床试验中的报告时间毒性:范围综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Apr 8;32(5):275. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08487-2.
10
Telemedicine and Cancer Clinical Research: Opportunities for Transformation.远程医疗与癌症临床研究:变革机遇。
Cancer J. 2024;30(1):22-26. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000695.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Time Toxicity of Cancer Treatment in the CCTG CO.17 Trial.评估 CCTG CO.17 试验中癌症治疗的时间毒性。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jun;19(6):e859-e866. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00737. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
2
The unequal burden of time toxicity.时间毒性的不平等负担。
Trends Cancer. 2023 May;9(5):373-375. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
Time spent at home among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia receiving azacitidine- or venetoclax-based regimens.老年急性髓系白血病患者接受阿扎胞苷或 venetoclax 为基础方案治疗时的居家时间。
Haematologica. 2023 Apr 1;108(4):1006-1014. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.280728.
4
Finding the Lowest-Cost Pharmacy for Cancer Supportive Care Medications: Not So Easy.为癌症支持性护理药物寻找最低成本的药店:并非易事。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Aug;18(8):e1342-e1349. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00051. Epub 2022 May 27.
5
The Time Toxicity of Cancer Treatment.癌症治疗的时间毒性
J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 20;40(15):1611-1615. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02810. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
6
Time-Related Burdens of Cancer Care.癌症护理的时间相关负担
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Apr;18(4):245-246. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00662. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
Has the Current Oncology Value Paradigm Forgotten Patients' Time?: Too Little of a Good Thing.当前肿瘤学价值范式是否忽视了患者的时间?:好东西太少了。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1757-1758. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3600.
8
Evaluating the Indirect Costs of Care Associated with Salvage Chemotherapy for Relapsed and Refractory Aggressive-Histology Lymphoma: A Subset Analysis of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) LY.12 Clinical Trial.评估挽救性化疗治疗复发/难治侵袭性淋巴瘤相关的间接医疗成本:加拿大癌症临床试验组(CCTG)LY.12 临床试验的亚组分析。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Mar 17;28(2):1256-1261. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28020119.
9
A Canadian Prospective Study of Linkage of Randomized Clinical Trial to Cancer and Mortality Registry Data.加拿大一项将随机临床试验与癌症和死亡率登记数据相联系的前瞻性研究。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Mar 8;28(2):1153-1160. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28020111.
10
Days Alive Outside Hospital and Readmissions in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Transplants from Identical Siblings or Alternative Donors.接受来自同卵同胞或替代供体的异基因移植患者的院外生存天数和再入院情况。
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 1;12(1):e2020055. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2020.055. eCollection 2020.