• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者、照护者和临床医生对癌症护理时间负担的看法。

Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on the Time Burdens of Cancer Care.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2447649. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47649.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47649
PMID:39602118
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Cancer and its care impose significant time commitments on patients and care partners. The oncology community has only recently conceptualized these commitments and the associated burden as the "time toxicity" of cancer care. As the concept gains traction, there is a critical need to fundamentally understand the perspectives of multiple stakeholders on the time burdens of cancer care.

OBJECTIVES

To explore time-consuming aspects of cancer care that were perceived as burdensome, identify the individuals most affected by time burdens of cancer care, and evaluate the consequences of these time burdens.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants in this qualitative analysis were recruited from a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center in Minnesota, where semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted from February 1 to October 31, 2023. Purposive and criterion sampling methods were used to recruit patients (adults with advanced stage gastrointestinal cancer receiving systemic cancer-directed treatment), care partners (patient-identified informal [unpaid] partners), and clinicians (physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, nurses, social workers, and schedulers). Data were analyzed from February 2023 to February 2024.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Thematic analysis was conducted with a hybrid (inductive and deductive methods) approach. Themes, subthemes, and illustrative quotations are presented.

RESULTS

Interviews included 47 participants (16 patients [8 aged ≤60 years; 12 women (75.0%)], 15 care partners [12 aged ≤60 years; 9 women (60.0%)], and 16 clinicians [11 women (68.7%)]). A total of 31 subthemes were identified that were grouped into 5 themes. Theme 1 captured time burdens due to health care outside the home (eg, travel, parking, and waiting time), while theme 2 identified the often invisible tasks performed at home (eg, handling insurance and medical bills, receiving formal home-based care). Theme 3 explored how care partners are affected alongside patients (eg, burdens extending to the wider network of family, friends, and community) and theme 4 represented the consequences of time burdens (eg, demoralization, seemingly short visits turned into all-day affairs). Finally, theme 5 referenced positive time spent in clinical interactions and hope for change (eg, patients value meaningful care, the "time toxicity" label is a spark for change).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This qualitative analysis identifies key sources and effects of time toxicity, as well as the populations affected. The results of this study will guide the oncology community to map, measure, and address future time burdens.

摘要

重要性

癌症及其治疗给患者和护理伙伴带来了巨大的时间负担。肿瘤学界直到最近才将这些承诺和相关负担概念化为癌症护理的“时间毒性”。随着这一概念的流行,我们迫切需要从多个利益相关者的角度来深入了解癌症护理的时间负担。

目的

探索被认为是负担的癌症护理耗时方面,确定受癌症护理时间负担影响最大的人群,并评估这些时间负担的后果。

设计、地点和参与者:本定性分析的参与者是从明尼苏达州的一家美国国立癌症研究所指定的癌症中心招募的,该中心于 2023 年 2 月 1 日至 10 月 31 日进行了半结构式定性访谈。采用目的性和标准性抽样方法招募患者(接受系统癌症治疗的晚期胃肠道癌症成年患者)、护理伙伴(患者指定的非正式(无薪)伙伴)和临床医生(医生、医生助理、执业护士、护士、社会工作者和调度员)。数据于 2023 年 2 月至 2024 年 2 月进行分析。

主要结果和措施

采用混合(归纳和演绎方法)方法进行主题分析。呈现主题、子主题和说明性引语。

结果

访谈包括 47 名参与者(16 名患者[≤60 岁 8 名;女性 12 名(75.0%)],15 名护理伙伴[≤60 岁 12 名;女性 9 名(60.0%)],16 名临床医生[11 名女性(68.7%)])。确定了 31 个子主题,分为 5 个主题。主题 1 描述了因院外医疗保健而产生的时间负担(例如,旅行、停车和等待时间),而主题 2 确定了在家中进行的通常无形的任务(例如,处理保险和医疗账单、接受家庭为基础的正式护理)。主题 3 探讨了护理伙伴如何与患者一起受到影响(例如,负担扩展到更广泛的家庭、朋友和社区网络),主题 4 代表了时间负担的后果(例如,士气低落,看似短暂的访问变成了全天的事情)。最后,主题 5 提到了临床互动中花费的宝贵时间和对变革的希望(例如,患者重视有意义的护理,“时间毒性”标签是变革的契机)。

结论和相关性

这项定性分析确定了时间毒性的关键来源和影响,以及受影响的人群。这项研究的结果将指导肿瘤学界绘制、衡量和解决未来的时间负担。

相似文献

1
Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on the Time Burdens of Cancer Care.患者、照护者和临床医生对癌症护理时间负担的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2447649. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47649.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
"It Was Like the Final Piece in the Puzzle for Me": A Qualitative Study on the Experiences of Autistic Women Initially Diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder.“对我来说,这就像拼图中的最后一块”:一项关于最初被诊断为边缘型人格障碍的自闭症女性经历的定性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):428-437. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0031. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
8
Hybrid Hospital-at-Home Program in Singapore: Ethnographic Study.新加坡的居家与医院混合项目:人种志研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 2;27:e66107. doi: 10.2196/66107.
9
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
The weight of time: experience of time toxicity among advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers-a qualitative study.时间的重量:晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的时间毒性体验——一项定性研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Sep 18;33(10):862. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09904-w.
2
Time toxicity of nivolumab in metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients: a single-institution experience.纳武利尤单抗在转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者中的时间毒性:单机构经验
Immunotherapy. 2025 Jun;17(8):577-583. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2025.2518913. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
3
The association of health care contact days with economic measures in the CCTG LY.12 trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Time toxicity among older patients with cancer treated with palliative systemic therapy.癌症老年患者接受姑息性全身治疗的时间毒性。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 30;32(9):621. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08844-1.
2
Immunotherapy in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: End of the Road or the First Chapter?表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变型非小细胞肺癌的免疫治疗:穷途末路还是崭露头角?
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Dec;42(34):4003-4007. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00829. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Time Toxicity Experienced by Early-Phase Cancer Clinical Trial Participants.
在加拿大临床试验组LY.12试验中,医疗接触天数与经济指标的关联。
Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf165.
4
Using technology to provide individualized respite for caregivers in rural communities.利用技术为农村社区的照顾者提供个性化的喘息机会。
Front Health Serv. 2025 May 15;5:1575763. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1575763. eCollection 2025.
5
Health Care Contact Days for Older Adults Enrolled in Cancer Clinical Trials.参加癌症临床试验的老年人的医疗接触天数。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250778. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0778.
6
Perceived Gaps in Oncologic Emergency Care for Patients with Cancer: A Qualitative Comparison of Emergency Medicine and Oncologist Physician Perspectives.癌症患者肿瘤急症护理中存在的认知差距:急诊医学与肿瘤学家观点的定性比较
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 27;17(5):828. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050828.
7
"The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home.“最大的挑战在于没有常规可言”:一项关于居家癌症护理时间负担的定性研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jan 27;33(2):80. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09132-8.
早期癌症临床试验参与者经历的时间毒性。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Sep;20(9):1252-1262. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00811. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Characterization of time toxicity in older patients with metastatic breast cancer.老年转移性乳腺癌患者的时间毒性特征。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Oct;207(3):541-550. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07379-7. Epub 2024 May 31.
5
The association of health-care contact days with physical function and survival in CCTG/AGITG CO.17.健康护理接触天数与 CCTG/AGITG CO.17 中的身体功能和生存的关系。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Aug 1;116(8):1313-1318. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae077.
6
Trajectories of Health Care Contact Days for Patients With Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.IV 期非小细胞肺癌患者的医疗接触日轨迹。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e244278. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4278.
7
Logistic burdens of cancer care: A qualitative study.癌症护理的逻辑负担:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 4;19(4):e0300852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300852. eCollection 2024.
8
Health Care Contact Days Among Older Cancer Survivors.老年癌症幸存者的医疗保健接触天数。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Jul;20(7):943-952. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00590. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
9
Consuming Patients' Days: Time Spent on Ambulatory Appointments by People With Cancer.消耗患者的时间:癌症患者门诊预约所花费的时间
Oncologist. 2024 May 3;29(5):400-406. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae016.
10
Global, regional, and national lifetime risks of developing and dying from gastrointestinal cancers in 185 countries: a population-based systematic analysis of GLOBOCAN.全球、区域和国家层面在 185 个国家和地区终生罹患和死于胃肠道癌症的风险:基于人群的全球癌症负担系统分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar;9(3):229-237. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00366-7. Epub 2024 Jan 4.