Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Assessment. 2024 Apr;31(3):617-636. doi: 10.1177/10731911231173080. Epub 2023 May 25.
Social media (SM) use has been primarily operationalized as frequency of use or as passive versus active use. We hypothesize that these constructs have shown mixed associations with psychological constructs because the factor structure underlying social media use (SMU) has not been fully identified. We conducted three studies with college students. In Study 1 ( = 176), we collected data about participants' SMU, informing item generation. In Study 2 ( = 311), we tested two factor structures: (a) passive, active social, and active non-social and (b) a hypothesized four-factor structure. Neither confirmatory model produced acceptable fits, but an exploratory factor analysis suggested a four-factor model: belief-based, consumption-based, image-based, and comparison-based SMU. This four-factor structure was supported in Study 3 ( = 397), which was preregistered, via a confirmatory factor analysis. The subscale items showed good internal consistencies, and evidence is presented for convergent validity. These factors represent a novel classification of people's SMU that can be measured with the Social Media Use Scale.
社交媒体(SM)的使用主要表现为使用频率或被动使用与主动使用。我们假设,由于社交媒体使用(SMU)的基础结构尚未完全确定,这些结构与心理结构的关联是混杂的。我们对大学生进行了三项研究。在研究 1(n = 176)中,我们收集了有关参与者的 SMU 的数据,以告知项目生成。在研究 2(n = 311)中,我们测试了两种因素结构:(a)被动、主动社交和主动非社交,以及(b)假设的四因素结构。这两个验证模型都没有产生可接受的拟合度,但探索性因素分析表明存在一个四因素模型:基于信仰、基于消费、基于形象和基于比较的 SMU。这项四因素结构在研究 3(n = 397)中得到了支持,该研究是预先注册的,通过验证性因素分析进行。子量表项目表现出良好的内部一致性,并提出了收敛有效性的证据。这些因素代表了人们对社交媒体使用的一种新的分类,可以用社交媒体使用量表来衡量。