• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较三种用于牙科的 3D 打印材料的拉伸模量。

Comparison of the tensile modulus of three 3D-printable materials used in dentistry.

机构信息

Division of Dentofacial Anomalies, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.

Department of Experimental Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.

出版信息

Dent Med Probl. 2023 Jul-Sep;60(3):505-511. doi: 10.17219/dmp/166070.

DOI:10.17219/dmp/166070
PMID:37227002
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has brought much innovation to medicine and has been successfully adopted in many areas of dentistry. Although 3D printing techniques are being increasingly used, their advantages and disadvantages still need to be investigated, particularly with regard to the materials used in dentistry. Dental materials should be biocompatible and non-cytotoxic, and have sufficient mechanical integrity in the oral environment in which they are intended for use.

OBJECTIVES

The present work aimed to identify and compare the mechanical properties of three 3D-printable resins. The materials included IBT Resin, BioMed Amber Resin and Dental LT Clear Resin. The Formlabs Form 2 printer was used.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A tensile strength test was performed on 10 specimens of each resin. Tensile modulus was measured on 2-millimeter-thick dumbbell-shaped specimens, 75 mm in length and 10 mm in width. The 10 specimens of each resin were mounted between the grips of a universal testing machine (Z10-X700).

RESULTS

The results showed that BioMed Amber specimens cracked easily, yet no deformation was observed. The amount of force used to test the tensility of the specimens was the lowest for IBT Resin, while it was the highest for Dental LT Clear Resin.

CONCLUSIONS

IBT Resin was the weakest material, whereas Dental Clear LT Resin was the strongest.

摘要

背景

三维(3D)打印技术为医学带来了许多创新,并已成功应用于牙科的许多领域。尽管 3D 打印技术的应用越来越广泛,但仍需要对其进行研究,特别是对牙科中使用的材料。牙科材料应具有生物相容性和非细胞毒性,并在预期使用的口腔环境中具有足够的机械完整性。

目的

本研究旨在鉴定和比较三种可 3D 打印的树脂的机械性能。所用材料包括 IBT 树脂、BioMed Amber 树脂和 Dental LT Clear 树脂。使用了 Formlabs Form 2 打印机。

材料和方法

对每种树脂的 10 个样本进行拉伸强度测试。在厚度为 2 毫米、长度为 75 毫米、宽度为 10 毫米的哑铃形样本上测量拉伸模量。每种树脂的 10 个样本均安装在万能试验机(Z10-X700)的夹具之间。

结果

结果表明,BioMed Amber 样本容易开裂,但没有观察到变形。用于测试样本拉伸强度的力最小的是 IBT 树脂,而最大的是 Dental LT Clear 树脂。

结论

IBT 树脂是最脆弱的材料,而 Dental Clear LT 树脂是最强的。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the tensile modulus of three 3D-printable materials used in dentistry.比较三种用于牙科的 3D 打印材料的拉伸模量。
Dent Med Probl. 2023 Jul-Sep;60(3):505-511. doi: 10.17219/dmp/166070.
2
Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study.两种选定的用于正畸的3D打印树脂的比较:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 10;16(6):2237. doi: 10.3390/ma16062237.
3
The Influence of Polishing and Artificial Aging on BioMed Amber Resin's Mechanical Properties.抛光和人工老化对生物医学琥珀树脂力学性能的影响。
J Funct Biomater. 2023 May 2;14(5):254. doi: 10.3390/jfb14050254.
4
Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing.用于牙科3D打印的两种选定树脂的压缩模量和拉伸模量的比较。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;15(24):8956. doi: 10.3390/ma15248956.
5
Mechanical Properties, Fractal Dimension, and Texture Analysis of Selected 3D-Printed Resins Used in Dentistry That Underwent the Compression Test.对经过压缩测试的牙科用选定3D打印树脂的力学性能、分形维数和纹理分析
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Apr 2;15(7):1772. doi: 10.3390/polym15071772.
6
Effects of Polishing and Artificial Aging on Mechanical Properties of Dental LT Clear Resin.打磨和人工老化对牙科LT透明树脂力学性能的影响。
J Funct Biomater. 2023 May 25;14(6):295. doi: 10.3390/jfb14060295.
7
A Novel Low-Shrinkage Resin for 3D Printing.一种用于3D打印的新型低收缩树脂。
J Dent. 2022 Mar;118:103957. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103957. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
8
3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials.3D 打印与传统固化临时冠桥牙科材料的比较。
Dent Mater. 2018 Feb;34(2):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
9
The Influence of Printing Layer Thickness and Orientation on the Mechanical Properties of DLP 3D-Printed Dental Resin.打印层厚度和方向对数字光处理3D打印牙科树脂力学性能的影响
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;15(5):1113. doi: 10.3390/polym15051113.
10
The impact of print orientation and graphene nanoplatelets on biaxial flexural strength and cytotoxicity of a 3D printable resin for occlusal splints.打印方向和石墨烯纳米片对用于咬合垫的 3D 打印树脂的双轴弯曲强度和细胞毒性的影响。
Dent Mater. 2024 Nov;40(11):1742-1752. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.07.031. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Predictability of Maxillary and Mandibular Dental Arch Expansion with Clear Aligners in Prepuberal Subjects: A Digital Retrospective Analysis.替牙期儿童使用透明矫治器进行上颌和下颌牙弓扩弓的疗效及可预测性:一项数字化回顾性分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 24;13(13):1508. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131508.
2
Three-Dimensional-Printed Photopolymer Resin Materials: A Narrative Review on Their Production Techniques and Applications in Dentistry.三维打印光固化树脂材料:关于其生产技术及在牙科领域应用的叙述性综述
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;17(3):316. doi: 10.3390/polym17030316.
3
Biocompatibility of 3D-printed vs. thermoformed and heat-cured intraoral appliances.
3D打印与热成型及热固化口腔矫治器的生物相容性
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Oct 29;12:1453888. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1453888. eCollection 2024.
4
Mechanical characterization and structural analysis of elastodontic appliances under intraoral and artificial aging conditions.在口腔内和人工老化条件下的弹性正畸矫治器的力学特性和结构分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):1337. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05101-z.
5
Characterisation of 3D Printable Filaments Subjected to Edible Liquids: An Analysis of Fused Deposition Modelling for Intraoral Applicability.可3D打印细丝在食用液体中的特性研究:口腔内适用性的熔融沉积建模分析
Int J Dent. 2024 Aug 30;2024:2118412. doi: 10.1155/2024/2118412. eCollection 2024.
6
Clinical effect of digitalized designed and 3D-printed repositioning splints in the treatment of anterior displacement of temporomandibular joint disc.数字化设计及3D打印复位夹板治疗颞下颌关节盘前移位的临床疗效
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 3;25(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07477-z.
7
Accuracy of temporomandibular disorders diagnosis evaluated through the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder (DC/TDM) Axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.通过颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TDM)轴II评估与轴I评估相比的颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 2;24(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03983-7.
8
Pregnancy related factors and temporomandibular disorders evaluated through the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) axis II: a cross sectional study.通过颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TMD)轴 II 评估与妊娠相关的因素及颞下颌关节紊乱病:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03930-6.
9
Comparative analysis of different types of occlusal splints for the management of sleep bruxism: a systematic review.不同类型咬合板治疗磨牙症的对比分析:系统评价。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03782-6.