• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Catheter-based therapies and short-term outcomes in the oncological patients with acute inferior vena cava thrombosis: a single centre experience.经导管治疗联合短期预后在伴有急性下腔静脉血栓形成的肿瘤患者中的应用:单中心经验。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Aug;96(1148):20230094. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20230094. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
Endovascular Therapies Using Catheter-Based Thrombectomy or Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Non-Cancer Associated Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.经导管血栓切除术或导管直接溶栓治疗急性非癌症相关下腔静脉血栓形成的血管内治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan-Dec;28:10742484231171579. doi: 10.1177/10742484231171579.
3
AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy coupled with dose-reduced rt-PA for massive inferior vena cava filter-related thrombosis: A single-center retrospective study.AngioJet 射流血栓切除术联合减少剂量 rt-PA 治疗巨大下腔静脉滤器相关血栓形成:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):263-268. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.098. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
4
Clinical outcomes of AngioJet pharmacomechanical thrombectomy catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of filter-related caval thrombosis.AngioJet药物机械性血栓切除术联合导管定向溶栓治疗滤器相关腔静脉血栓形成的临床结局
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jan 26;11(3):598-609. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i3.598.
5
Presentation and Management of Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis.下腔静脉血栓形成的临床表现与治疗
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Apr;56:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.08.082. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
6
Outcomes of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Acute and Subacute Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis: A Retrospective Evaluation in a Single Institution.经皮导管接触性溶栓治疗急性和亚急性下腔静脉血栓形成的疗效:单中心回顾性评估。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;54(4):504-512. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.025. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
7
Comparison of Direct Iliofemoral Stenting Following AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy vs Staged Stenting After AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy Plus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis.急性下肢深静脉血栓形成患者行 AngioJet 旋切血栓清除术后即刻行直接髂股动脉支架置入与分期支架置入的比较:导管直接溶栓联合 AngioJet 旋切血栓清除术后。
J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Feb;25(1):133-139. doi: 10.1177/1526602817714570. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
8
AngioJet Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy and Catheter Directed Thrombolysis vs. Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Alone for the Treatment of Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.AngioJet 机械血栓切除术与导管溶栓联合治疗与单独导管溶栓治疗髂股静脉血栓形成的疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;60(4):578-585. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
9
Meta-analysis of lytic catheter-based intervention for acute proximal deep vein thrombosis in the reduction of post-thrombotic syndrome.基于导管溶栓的急性近端深静脉血栓形成后血栓后综合征缓解的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 Jul;11(4):866-875.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.03.017. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
10
Outcome of AngioJet mechanical thrombus aspiration in the treatment of acute lower extremities deep venous thrombosis.AngioJet 机械血栓抽吸术治疗急性下肢深静脉血栓形成的疗效。
Vascular. 2021 Jun;29(3):415-423. doi: 10.1177/1708538120958595. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and risk factors for inferior vena cava filter thrombosis detected at time of filter retrieval in patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.下肢深静脉血栓形成患者滤器取出时检测到的下腔静脉滤器血栓形成的发生率及危险因素:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):8313-8325. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-724. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors and a predictive model for nonfilter-associated inferior vena cava thrombosis in patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.下肢深静脉血栓形成患者非滤器相关下腔静脉血栓形成的危险因素及预测模型
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 11;9:1083152. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1083152. eCollection 2022.
2
Angiojet pharmacomechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulant therapy alone in massive cancer-associated thrombosis: a single centre retrospective cohort study.Angiojet 机械血栓切除联合抗凝治疗与单纯抗凝治疗在巨大癌症相关性血栓中的疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Feb;55(2):365-375. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02770-5. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
3
Temporary inferior vena cava filters factors associated with non-removal.临时下腔静脉滤器取出的相关因素。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr;33(4):2585-2592. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09266-5. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
A review of inferior vena cava filters.下腔静脉滤器的综述。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Jan 1;96(1141):20211125. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211125. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
5
AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy to Treat Inferior Vena Cava Filter-Related Thrombosis: Efficacy and Safety Compared With Large-Lumen Catheter Suction.AngioJet 机械血栓切除术治疗下腔静脉滤器相关血栓形成:与大腔导管抽吸术相比的疗效和安全性
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 21;9:837455. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.837455. eCollection 2022.
6
Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis Risk in 1582 Patients with Inferior Vena Cava Filters.1582例下腔静脉滤器置入患者的下腔静脉血栓形成风险
Radiology. 2022 May;303(2):300-302. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211169. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
7
Endovascular Management of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in the Oncologic Patient Population.肿瘤患者群体中静脉血栓栓塞性疾病的血管内治疗
Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Mar;24(3):351-362. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01191-6. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
8
Advances in the Management of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.癌症相关血栓形成的管理进展。
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2021 Mar;47(2):139-149. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722863. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
9
Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Venous Thrombosis.编辑推荐——欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2021年静脉血栓形成管理临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;61(1):9-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
10
Cancer-associated thrombosis: the when, how and why.癌症相关血栓形成:何时、如何以及为何。
Eur Respir Rev. 2019 Mar 27;28(151). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0119-2018. Print 2019 Mar 31.

经导管治疗联合短期预后在伴有急性下腔静脉血栓形成的肿瘤患者中的应用:单中心经验。

Catheter-based therapies and short-term outcomes in the oncological patients with acute inferior vena cava thrombosis: a single centre experience.

机构信息

Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, PR China.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2023 Aug;96(1148):20230094. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20230094. Epub 2023 May 25.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.20230094
PMID:37227799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10392649/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of catheter-based therapy (CBT) using AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (ART) device or large lumen catheter (LLC) in the oncological patients with inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including eligible patients with IVCT treated with CBT coupled with dose-reduced thrombolysis as the first-line treatment from February 1, 2015 to January 1, 2022. The baseline demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, treatment details, course data were all reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients (mean age 58.8 years, 57.6% male) was included, of whom 17 patients underwent ART and 16 underwent LLC aspiration, the technical success rates were 100%. All patients subsequently underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis relative to reduced-dose thrombolysis. At the end of catheter-directed thrombolysis, clinical success was achieved in 26 (78.8%) patients. In the subgroup analysis, ART seemed to receive a slightly higher rate of thrombus removal Grade III (47.1% 12.5%, = .057). The symptoms of leg pain and swelling post-treatment were significantly improved in both groups ( < .001). Except for transient macroscopic hemoglobinuria occurring in patients with ART, none of all patients suffered from procedure-related adverse events and major complications. Minor complications such as bleeding events occurred in 6.1% (2/33) of patients. At the 6 month follow-up, the incidence of recurrent thrombosis and mild post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) were 9.7% (3/31) and 6.5% (2/31).

CONCLUSION

CBT is a safe and effective modality for the management of IVCT in the oncological patients, leading to high levels of technical and clinical success, symptoms alleviation, as well as a low incidence of minor complication, mild PTS and recurrence.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE STATEMENT

The available data and evidence of endovascular therapy (ET) on oncologic patients with IVCT remains insufficient. The purpose of present single center retrospective study including 33 oncological patients is to investigate the preliminary safety and efficacy of CBT using ART device or LLC. The results demonstrated that CBTs are safe and effective as an ET modality in majority of eligible patients with symptomatic acute cancer-associated IVCT, indicating high levels of technical and clinical success, symptoms alleviation, as well as a low prevalence of minor complication, mild post-thrombotic syndrome and recurrence. Furthermore, they have the advantages of accelerated reduction of thrombus burden in a moderate time, speedy restoration of blood flow, but at the risk of potentially increased economic cost. Notably, in the condition of parallel time and dosages of lytic agents, ART tends to achieve a slightly higher thrombus removal Grade III than LLCA.

摘要

目的

研究使用 AngioJet 旋切血栓清除术(ART)装置或大腔导管(LLC)进行经导管治疗(CBT)在伴有下腔静脉血栓形成(IVCT)的肿瘤患者中的安全性和有效性。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2015 年 2 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 1 日期间接受 CBT 联合减剂量溶栓治疗作为一线治疗的 IVCT 肿瘤患者。回顾了患者的基线人口统计学、合并症、临床特征、治疗细节和病程数据。

结果

共纳入 33 例患者(平均年龄 58.8 岁,57.6%为男性),其中 17 例接受了 ART 治疗,16 例接受了 LLC 抽吸治疗,技术成功率为 100%。所有患者随后均接受了导管直接溶栓治疗。在导管直接溶栓结束时,26 例(78.8%)患者达到临床成功。在亚组分析中,ART 似乎能达到稍高的血栓清除分级 III(47.1%比 12.5%,=0.057)。两组患者的腿部疼痛和肿胀症状在治疗后均显著改善(均<.001)。除 ART 治疗的患者出现一过性肉眼血尿外,所有患者均未发生与治疗相关的不良事件和主要并发症。少数并发症如出血事件在 6.1%(2/33)的患者中发生。在 6 个月的随访中,复发性血栓形成和轻度血栓后综合征(PTS)的发生率分别为 9.7%(3/31)和 6.5%(2/31)。

结论

CBT 是治疗肿瘤患者 IVCT 的一种安全有效的方法,可实现较高的技术和临床成功率,缓解症状,且并发症发生率低,轻度 PTS 和复发率低。

知识进展声明

关于肿瘤患者伴发 IVCT 的血管内治疗(ET)的现有数据和证据仍然不足。本单中心回顾性研究纳入了 33 例肿瘤患者,旨在初步探讨使用 ART 装置或 LLC 的 CBT 的安全性和疗效。结果表明,在大多数有症状的急性伴发癌症的 IVCT 肿瘤患者中,CBT 作为一种 ET 方法是安全有效的,可实现较高的技术和临床成功率,缓解症状,且并发症发生率低,轻度 PTS 和复发率低。此外,CBT 可在相对较短的时间内加速血栓负荷的减少,迅速恢复血流,但存在潜在增加经济成本的风险。值得注意的是,在溶栓药物的平行时间和剂量条件下,ART 达到的血栓清除分级 III 似乎稍高于 LLC。