Division of Neurology, BC Cancer, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Cancer. 2023 Sep 15;129(18):2848-2855. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34852. Epub 2023 May 25.
Collaborative relationships between academic oncology and industry (pharmaceutical, biotechnology, "omic," and medical device companies) are essential for therapeutic development in oncology; however, limited research on engagement in and perceptions of these relationships has been done.
Survey questions were developed to evaluate relationships between academic oncology and industry. An electronic survey was delivered to 1000 randomly selected members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, a professional organization for oncologists, eliciting respondents' views around oncology-industry collaborations. The responses were analyzed according to prespecified plans.
There were 225 survey respondents. Most were from the United States (70.0%), worked at an academic institution (60.1%), worked in medical oncology (81.2%), and had an active relationship with industry (85.8%). One quarter (26.7%) of respondents reported difficulty establishing a relationship with industry collaborators, and most respondents (75%) did not report having had mentorship in developing these relationships. The majority (85.3%) of respondents considered these collaborations important to their careers. Respondents generally thought that scientific integrity was preserved (92%), and most respondents (95%) had little concern over the quality of the collaborative product. Many (60%) shared concerns over potential conflict of interest if an individual with a compensated relationship promoted an industry product for clinical care/research, yet most respondents (67%) stated these relationships did not shape their interactions with patients.
This study provides novel data characterizing the nature of collaborative relationships between clinicians, researchers, and industry in oncology. Although respondents considered these collaborations an important part of clinical and academic oncology, formal education or mentorship around these relationships was rare. Conflicting findings around conflict of interest highlight the importance of more dedicated research in this area.
Business enterprises in health care play a central role in cancer research and care, driving the development of new medical testing, drugs, and devices. Effective working relationships among clinicians, researchers, and these industry partners can promote innovative research and enhance patient care. Study of these collaborations has been limited to date. Through distribution of a questionnaire to cancer clinicians and researchers, we found that most participants consider these relationships valuable, though they find establishing such relationships challenging partly because of gaps in educational programs in this area. Our findings also highlight the need for further policy around the potential bias these relationships can introduce.
学术肿瘤学与行业(制药、生物技术、“组学”和医疗器械公司)之间的合作关系对于肿瘤学的治疗发展至关重要;然而,对于这些关系的参与和看法的研究有限。
制定了评估学术肿瘤学与行业关系的调查问题。向美国临床肿瘤学会的 1000 名随机成员发送了电子调查,以征求他们对肿瘤学-行业合作关系的看法。根据预设计划分析了这些回应。
共有 225 名调查对象。他们大多数来自美国(70.0%),在学术机构工作(60.1%),从事医学肿瘤学工作(81.2%),与行业有积极的合作关系(85.8%)。四分之一(26.7%)的受访者表示难以与行业合作者建立关系,大多数受访者(75%)表示没有接受过发展这些关系的指导。大多数(85.3%)受访者认为这些合作关系对他们的职业生涯很重要。受访者普遍认为科学诚信得到了维护(92%),大多数受访者(95%)对合作产品的质量几乎没有担忧。许多人(60%)对个人如果有报酬的关系而推广用于临床护理/研究的行业产品是否存在潜在利益冲突表示担忧,但大多数受访者(67%)表示这些关系不会影响他们与患者的互动。
本研究提供了描述肿瘤学中临床医生、研究人员和行业之间合作关系性质的新数据。尽管受访者认为这些合作关系是临床和学术肿瘤学的重要组成部分,但关于这些关系的正规教育或指导却很少。在利益冲突方面存在相互矛盾的发现,突出了在这一领域进行更专门研究的重要性。