• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对强制入学学生的电子CHUG饮酒动机量表进行探索性因素分析。

An exploratory factor analysis of an e-CHUG drinking motives scale with mandated students.

作者信息

Neeley Kayla M, Stanley Taylor B, Correia Christopher J

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Auburn University.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Sep;37(6):823-828. doi: 10.1037/adb0000938. Epub 2023 May 25.

DOI:10.1037/adb0000938
PMID:37227822
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Colleges maintain alcohol policies in response to student alcohol misuse, and sanctions for violating these policies often mandate students to attend alcohol education and/or counseling (Anderson & Gadaleto, 2021). Electronic Checkup to Go (e-CHUG) is a widely used online motivational intervention program that provides feedback to college students to encourage them to alter their drinking behaviors (eCheckup to Go, 2021). While measures included in e-CHUG have clear clinical utility, their psychometric properties have not been evaluated. The present study was designed to evaluate the factor structure and validity of the 18-item drinking motives scale included in the intervention.

METHOD

Participants were 3,546 students from a large public university who were mandated to complete e-CHUG (58% male, = 19.06, = 1.35) between 2013 and 2021. Students completed a battery of measures, including questions regarding alcohol consumption, drinking motives and consequences, and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT).

RESULTS

An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to investigate the structure of the drinking motives scale. Two factors were retained: The first factor represented coping motives, and the second factor represented a mixture of enhancement and social motives. Hierarchical regression analyses explored the associations between the retained drinking motives factors and alcohol-related variables. Both coping motives and enhancement/social motives positively and uniquely predicted drinking consequences and AUDIT scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides support for the construct and incremental validity of e-CHUG's drinking motives measure and could have important implications for the consideration of drinking motives during e-CHUG interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

高校制定酒精政策以应对学生酒精滥用问题,违反这些政策的处罚措施通常要求学生参加酒精教育和/或咨询(安德森和加达莱托,2021年)。电子自助检查(e-CHUG)是一个广泛使用的在线动机干预项目,它为大学生提供反馈,鼓励他们改变饮酒行为(电子自助检查,2021年)。虽然e-CHUG中包含的措施具有明确的临床效用,但其心理测量特性尚未得到评估。本研究旨在评估该干预措施中包含的18项饮酒动机量表的因子结构和效度。

方法

参与者是来自一所大型公立大学的3546名学生,他们在2013年至2021年期间被要求完成e-CHUG(58%为男性,平均年龄 = 19.06岁,标准差 = 1.35)。学生们完成了一系列测量,包括关于酒精消费、饮酒动机和后果的问题,以及酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)。

结果

进行了探索性因子分析以研究饮酒动机量表的结构。保留了两个因子:第一个因子代表应对动机,第二个因子代表强化和社交动机的混合。分层回归分析探讨了保留的饮酒动机因子与酒精相关变量之间的关联。应对动机和强化/社交动机都正向且独特地预测了饮酒后果和AUDIT分数。

结论

本研究为e-CHUG饮酒动机测量的结构效度和增量效度提供了支持,并且可能对在e-CHUG干预期间考虑饮酒动机具有重要意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
An exploratory factor analysis of an e-CHUG drinking motives scale with mandated students.对强制入学学生的电子CHUG饮酒动机量表进行探索性因素分析。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Sep;37(6):823-828. doi: 10.1037/adb0000938. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
A comprehensive examination of alcohol-related motivations among college students: Unique relations of drinking motives and motivations for drinking responsibly.全面考察大学生的酒精相关动机:饮酒动机与负责任饮酒动机的独特关系。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Dec;30(6):809-819. doi: 10.1037/pha0000526. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
3
School Investment, Drinking Motives, and High-Risk, High-Reward Partying Decisions Mediate the Relationship Between Trait Self-Control and Alcohol Consumption Among College Drinkers.学校投入、饮酒动机以及高风险、高回报的派对决策在大学生特质自我控制与酒精消费之间的关系中起中介作用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Jan;77(1):133-42. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.133.
4
Social anxiety symptoms and drinking behaviors among college students: the mediating effects of drinking motives.大学生社交焦虑症状与饮酒行为:饮酒动机的中介作用
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Sep;28(3):710-8. doi: 10.1037/a0036501. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
An Exploration of the Four-Factor Structure of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised Among Undergraduate Students in China.中国大学生饮酒动机问卷修订版四因素结构的探索
Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(12):1590-8. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1027924. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
6
Drinking to cope among African American college students: an assessment of episode-specific motives.美国非裔大学生借酒消愁:特定情境下动机的评估
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Sep;28(3):671-81. doi: 10.1037/a0036303. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
7
Depressive Symptoms and Drinking Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Drinking Motives and Protective Behavioral Strategies Among College Students.抑郁症状与饮酒结果:饮酒动机和保护性行为策略在大学生中的中介作用。
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Jan 2;53(1):143-153. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1327974. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
8
What pandemic? A multisite study of drinking motives and drinking games participation among college students during a pandemic (COVID-19) academic year.什么大流行?在大流行(COVID-19)学年期间对大学生饮酒动机和饮酒游戏参与情况的多地点研究。
Addict Behav. 2023 Mar;138:107560. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107560. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
9
Compounding risk: An examination of associations between spirituality/religiosity, drinking motives, and alcohol-related ambivalence among heavy drinking young adults.复合风险:对大量饮酒的年轻人的精神性/宗教信仰、饮酒动机与酒精相关矛盾心理之间关联的考察。
Addict Behav. 2016 Dec;63:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.026. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
10
Motivations to combine alcohol and nicotine in college students: A validation of the Alcohol and Nicotine Motives Scale.大学生将酒精和尼古丁混合使用的动机:酒精和尼古丁动机量表的验证。
Addict Behav. 2021 Jan;112:106645. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106645. Epub 2020 Sep 6.