Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System.
Fam Syst Health. 2023 Dec;41(4):443-453. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000801. Epub 2023 May 25.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care providers (PCPs), nurses, and integrated mental health specialists continued to collaboratively manage depression among patients using both in-person and virtual (i.e., hybrid) modalities. Few studies have characterized how hybrid services are currently delivered within interdisciplinary primary care teams. This study aimed to understand frontline PCPs' perspectives on providing hybrid virtual and in-person depression care during the pandemic.
From September to November 2020, 12 semistructured individual interviews focused on depression management were conducted with PCPs in two Veterans Health Administration (VA) clinics in Los Angeles, which resumed in-person services while balancing rising COVID-19 cases. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for depression management patterns. Themes were derived using a team-based constant comparative analytic approach.
The pandemic and subsequent expanded use of virtual care necessitated clinic adaptations to depression assessments and procedures. PCPs perceived increased depression and anxiety among patients with existing psychiatric conditions, attributed to social distancing and isolation restrictions. They expressed acceptance of virtual care modalities for patients' depression management. PCPs did not perceive a delay in mental health care delivery in the shift to virtual care but noted the possibility of patients being lost to follow-up.
During the pandemic, there has been heightened PCP concern for patients' emotional well-being and adaptations of clinic processes to meet needs for depression care. While PCPs were optimistic about new virtual care options for depression management, virtual care transfers remained poorly defined and the extent to which patient care experiences and health outcomes have been disrupted remains unknown. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,初级保健提供者 (PCP)、护士和综合心理健康专家继续通过面对面和虚拟 (即混合) 模式共同管理患者的抑郁症。很少有研究描述了跨学科初级保健团队目前如何提供混合服务。本研究旨在了解一线 PCP 对大流行期间提供混合虚拟和面对面抑郁症护理的看法。
2020 年 9 月至 11 月,在洛杉矶的两家退伍军人事务部 (VA) 诊所进行了 12 次半结构化的个体访谈,重点是抑郁症管理,这些诊所恢复了面对面服务,同时平衡了不断增加的 COVID-19 病例。访谈进行了录音、转录和编码,以分析抑郁症管理模式。使用基于团队的恒比分析方法得出主题。
大流行以及随后扩大虚拟护理的使用,需要对抑郁症评估和程序进行诊所调整。PCP 认为,由于社交距离和隔离限制,患有现有精神疾病的患者的抑郁症和焦虑症有所增加。他们表示接受虚拟护理模式来管理患者的抑郁症。PCP 认为在向虚拟护理转变的过程中,心理健康护理的提供并没有延迟,但注意到患者可能会失去随访。
在大流行期间,PCP 更加关注患者的情绪健康,以及调整诊所流程以满足抑郁症护理需求。虽然 PCP 对新的虚拟护理选择治疗抑郁症持乐观态度,但虚拟护理转介仍未明确界定,患者护理体验和健康结果受到干扰的程度仍不得而知。