• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灵活性可预测新冠疫情第一年的慢性焦虑和抑郁——心理健康轨迹的纵向调查

Flexibility predicts chronic anxiety and depression during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic-A longitudinal investigation of mental health trajectories.

作者信息

Hemi Alla, Sopp Marie Roxanne, Bonanno George, Michael Tanja, McGiffin Jed, Levy-Gigi Einat

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Bar Ilan University.

Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University.

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2024 Sep;16(6):961-970. doi: 10.1037/tra0001517. Epub 2023 May 25.

DOI:10.1037/tra0001517
PMID:37227833
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 pandemic is a significant stressor, potentially putting the well-being of the general population at risk. However, a significant proportion of the population exhibits resilience, raising questions regarding psychological constructs that could contribute to resilient coping. Studies indicate that flexibility, defined as the ability to adapt to changing contextual demands by employing various emotional, cognitive, and behavioral strategies, may significantly contribute to coping with long-term stressors such as COVID-19.

METHOD

Cognitive and coping flexibility domains and longitudinal trajectories of anxiety and depression were assessed at three-time points across 13 months in 571 Israelis.

RESULTS

Analyses revealed four different trajectories for anxiety: resilient (66%), chronic (22%), emerging (7%), and improving (6%), and two trajectories for depression: resilient (87%) and chronic (13%). Individuals in the chronic trajectory group (for both anxiety and depression) exhibited lower cognitive flexibility and coping flexibility levels than individuals in the resilient trajectory group. Across time, anxiety and depression were linked to clinically significant posttraumatic stress disorder-like symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Low cognitive and coping flexibility are linked to the probability of experiencing chronic mental health problems, making them a potential target for prevention and treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

新冠疫情是一个重大压力源,可能危及普通人群的幸福安康。然而,相当一部分人表现出了恢复力,这引发了关于有助于恢复力应对的心理构念的问题。研究表明,灵活性(定义为通过运用各种情绪、认知和行为策略来适应不断变化的情境需求的能力)可能对应对新冠疫情等长期压力源有显著帮助。

方法

对571名以色列人在13个月内的三个时间点评估了认知和应对灵活性领域以及焦虑和抑郁的纵向轨迹。

结果

分析揭示了焦虑的四种不同轨迹:恢复力型(66%)、慢性型(22%)、新发型(7%)和改善型(6%),以及抑郁的两种轨迹:恢复力型(87%)和慢性型(13%)。慢性轨迹组(焦虑和抑郁均如此)的个体在认知灵活性和应对灵活性水平上低于恢复力轨迹组的个体。随着时间推移,焦虑和抑郁与具有临床意义的创伤后应激障碍样症状相关。

结论

认知和应对灵活性低与出现慢性心理健康问题的可能性相关,使其成为预防和治疗的潜在目标。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Flexibility predicts chronic anxiety and depression during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic-A longitudinal investigation of mental health trajectories.灵活性可预测新冠疫情第一年的慢性焦虑和抑郁——心理健康轨迹的纵向调查
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Sep;16(6):961-970. doi: 10.1037/tra0001517. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
Lack of robust associations between prepandemic coping strategies and frontolimbic circuitry with depression and anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: A preregistered longitudinal study.大流行前应对策略与前额皮质-边缘回路与 COVID-19 大流行期间抑郁和焦虑症状之间缺乏稳健关联:一项预先注册的纵向研究。
Behav Neurosci. 2022 Dec;136(6):528-540. doi: 10.1037/bne0000534.
3
Longitudinal investigation of factors influencing mental health during centralized quarantine for COVID-19.新冠疫情集中隔离期间影响心理健康的因素的纵向研究。
Int Health. 2024 May 1;16(3):344-350. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihad062.
4
Adaptive responding to prolonged stress exposure: A binational study on the impact of flexibility on latent profiles of cognitive, emotional and behavioural responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.适应长期压力暴露:一项关于灵活性对 COVID-19 大流行期间认知、情绪和行为反应潜在模式影响的跨国研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e6163-e6174. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14053. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) over the course of the pandemic in a large German general population sample.大样本德国普通人群在疫情期间对简明韧性应对量表(BRCS)的心理测量学评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 27;19(8):e0309587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309587. eCollection 2024.
6
Psychopathology and resilience following strict COVID-19 lockdowns in Hubei, China: Examining person- and context-level predictors for longitudinal trajectories.中国湖北实施严格新冠疫情封锁措施后的精神病理学与心理韧性:探究纵向轨迹的个体层面和情境层面预测因素
Am Psychol. 2022 Feb-Mar;77(2):262-275. doi: 10.1037/amp0000958. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
7
Psychological resources and flexibility predict resilient mental health trajectories during the French covid-19 lockdown.心理资源和灵活性可预测法国新冠疫情封锁期间心理健康的恢复轨迹。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 23;12(1):10674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14572-5.
8
Younger people are more vulnerable to stress, anxiety and depression during COVID-19 pandemic: A global cross-sectional survey.年轻人在 COVID-19 大流行期间更容易受到压力、焦虑和抑郁的影响:一项全球横断面调查。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 13;109:110236. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110236. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
9
Identifying longitudinal trajectories of emotional distress symptoms 5 years after traumatic brain injury.识别创伤性脑损伤5年后情绪困扰症状的纵向轨迹。
Brain Inj. 2014;28(12):1542-50. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.934285. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
10
Prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety and trauma-like symptoms in Chinese psychiatric patients during the fifth wave of COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Hong Kong.在第五波 COVID-19 大流行期间,中国精神病患者中抑郁、焦虑和创伤样症状的流行情况及其相关因素:一项在香港进行的横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 17;24(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05815-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional regulatory flexibility mitigates effects of school-related stress.情绪调节灵活性可减轻与学校相关的压力的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;15(1):25455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10708-5.
2
Examining the role of psychological flexibility and unconditional self-acceptance as mediators in the relationship between new media literacy and psychological wellbeing among Gen Z.探讨心理灵活性和无条件自我接纳作为中介变量在Z世代新媒体素养与心理健康关系中的作用。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Apr 30;14:155. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1077_24. eCollection 2025.
3
Depressive symptom trajectories among general population during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iceland: a prospective cohort study (2020-2023).
冰岛新冠疫情期间普通人群的抑郁症状轨迹:一项前瞻性队列研究(2020 - 2023年)
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Nov 4;2(2):e001294. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001294. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Emotional regulation and coping strategies predicted trajectories of anxiety across the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.情绪调节和应对策略预测了新冠疫情第一年焦虑情绪的发展轨迹。
J Ment Health. 2024 Nov 25:1-10. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2024.2426978.
5
A systematic review of individual, social, and societal resilience factors in response to societal challenges and crises.一项关于应对社会挑战和危机时个人、社会及社会复原力因素的系统综述。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Oct 5;2(1):92. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00138-w.
6
One-year predictors of PTSD symptoms, anxiety, and depression in SARS-CoV-2 survivors: psychological flexibility and major life events as main predictive factors.新冠病毒2型幸存者创伤后应激障碍症状、焦虑和抑郁的一年期预测因素:以心理灵活性和重大生活事件作为主要预测因素
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 27;15:1378213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378213. eCollection 2024.
7
Executive functioning in posttraumatic stress disorder: Understanding how inhibition, switching, and test modality affect reaction times.创伤后应激障碍中的执行功能:了解抑制、转换和测试模式如何影响反应时间。
Neuropsychology. 2024 Sep;38(6):516-530. doi: 10.1037/neu0000964. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
8
Regulatory flexibility and school climate moderate the relationship between stress exposure and depression severity in school educators.监管灵活性和学校氛围调节了学校教育者的压力暴露与抑郁严重程度之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 21;14(1):11543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62150-8.
9
Generation climate crisis, COVID-19, and Russia-Ukraine-War: global crises and mental health in adolescents.代际气候危机、新冠疫情和俄乌战争:全球危机与青少年心理健康
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;33(7):2203-2216. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02300-x. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
10
Trajectories of resilience and mental distress to global major disruptions.韧性和精神困扰在全球重大干扰下的变化轨迹。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Dec;26(12):1171-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.017. Epub 2022 Oct 24.