Department of Psychology, University of Wuerzburg.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Jul;49(7):1068-1082. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001126. Epub 2023 May 25.
When a single action is required, along with the simultaneous inhibition of another action, this typically results in frequent false-positive executions of the latter (inhibition failures). The absence of inhibitory demands in dual-action trials can render performance less error-prone (and sometimes faster) than in single-action trials. In the present study, we investigated the temporal dynamics of inhibitory control difficulties by varying the preparation time (for simultaneous action execution and inhibition). In two experiments, participants responded to a single peripheral visual target either with an eye movement toward it (Single Saccade), with a spatially corresponding button press (Single Manual), or with both responses simultaneously (Dual Action) as indicated by a color cue. Preparation time was manipulated via the cue-stimulus interval within blocks (Experiment 1) and between blocks (Experiment 2). Overall, responses were faster with longer (vs. shorter) preparation time. Crucially, however, our results reveal the exact dynamics of how inhibition failures (and thus dual-action benefits) in both response modalities substantially decrease with longer preparation, even though the cue did not contain information regarding the fully specified response that needed to be inhibited (i.e., its direction). These results highlight the role of sufficient preparation time not only for efficient action execution but also for concurrent inhibitory performance. The study contradicts the idea that inhibition can only be exerted globally or on the level of a fully specified response. Instead, it may also be directed at effector system representations or all associated responses, suggesting a highly flexible targeting of inhibitory control in cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
当需要执行单一动作,同时又要抑制另一个动作时,这通常会导致后者(抑制失败)的频繁误操作。在双动作试验中没有抑制要求,可以使性能降低错误率(有时更快)比在单动作试验中。在本研究中,我们通过改变准备时间(同时执行动作和抑制)来研究抑制控制困难的时间动态。在两个实验中,参与者要么用眼睛向单一的外围视觉目标移动(单一扫视),要么用空间对应的按钮按下(单一手动),要么根据颜色提示同时做出这两个反应(双动作)。通过块内(实验 1)和块间(实验 2)的提示-刺激间隔来操纵准备时间。总的来说,随着准备时间的延长(相对于缩短),反应更快。然而,至关重要的是,我们的结果揭示了抑制失败(因此双动作优势)在两种反应模式下的动态,即使提示不包含需要抑制的完全指定响应(即其方向)的信息,抑制失败(因此双动作优势)也会随着准备时间的延长而大大减少。这些结果强调了充分准备时间的作用不仅对于有效执行动作,而且对于并发抑制性能也是如此。该研究反驳了抑制只能全局发挥作用或仅在完全指定响应水平上发挥作用的观点。相反,它也可能针对效应器系统表示或所有相关反应,这表明认知中的抑制控制具有高度灵活的靶向性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。