• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影术的疗效和安全性分析:单中心数据。

Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Catheterization through Distal Transradial Access: A Single-Center Data.

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Shihezi People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine, Xinjiang, China.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 May 16;2023:2560659. doi: 10.1155/2023/2560659. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1155/2023/2560659
PMID:37228484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10205404/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The distal transradial access (dTRA) is a new puncture site for coronary catheterization. We sought to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and complication rates of using the dTRA for cardiac catheterization in Chinese patients.

METHODS

A total of 263 consecutive patients who underwent catheterization through the dTRA were enrolled. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of conversion to another access site due to the impossibility of successful artery puncture or intubation. Secondary safety endpoints were the rates of bleeding-related complications and nerve disorders.

RESULTS

Among 263 patients, the puncture success rate was 96.2% (253/263). Eleven patients were successfully punctured, but the guide wire was difficult to advance. One patient had intubation failure, and the success rate of intubation was 91.6% (241/263). Two hundred thirty-three patients underwent puncture via the right dTRA, 5 patients underwent puncture via the left dTRA, and 3 patients underwent puncture via the bilateral dTRA. A total of 158 (65.6%) patients underwent coronary angiography, and 83 (34.4%) patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. After the procedure, only 2 (0.8%) patients had mild bleeding at the puncture site, 2 (0.8%) had a forearm hematoma, and no patient had a nerve disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

DTRA has a low incidence of complications, making it a safe and effective technique for cardiac catheterization.

摘要

背景与目的

远端桡动脉入路(dTRA)是一种新的冠状动脉导管插入术穿刺部位。我们旨在评估中国患者经 dTRA 进行心脏导管插入术的可行性、安全性和并发症发生率。

方法

共纳入 263 例连续经 dTRA 进行导管插入术的患者。该研究的主要终点是因动脉穿刺或插管无法成功而转换为其他入路的比例。次要安全性终点是出血相关并发症和神经障碍的发生率。

结果

在 263 例患者中,穿刺成功率为 96.2%(253/263)。11 例患者穿刺成功,但导丝难以推进。1 例患者插管失败,插管成功率为 91.6%(241/263)。233 例患者经右侧 dTRA 穿刺,5 例患者经左侧 dTRA 穿刺,3 例患者经双侧 dTRA 穿刺。共 158 例(65.6%)患者行冠状动脉造影,83 例(34.4%)患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。术后仅 2 例(0.8%)患者穿刺部位出现轻度出血,2 例(0.8%)患者出现前臂血肿,无患者出现神经障碍。

结论

dTRA 并发症发生率低,是一种安全有效的心脏导管插入术技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4ca/10205404/8db342d1b008/CDTP2023-2560659.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4ca/10205404/8e5f918d37f0/CDTP2023-2560659.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4ca/10205404/d3711498a67a/CDTP2023-2560659.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4ca/10205404/8db342d1b008/CDTP2023-2560659.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4ca/10205404/8e5f918d37f0/CDTP2023-2560659.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4ca/10205404/d3711498a67a/CDTP2023-2560659.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4ca/10205404/8db342d1b008/CDTP2023-2560659.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Catheterization through Distal Transradial Access: A Single-Center Data.经远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影术的疗效和安全性分析:单中心数据。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 May 16;2023:2560659. doi: 10.1155/2023/2560659. eCollection 2023.
2
Feasibility of Distal Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single Center Experience.桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性:单中心经验
Cardiology. 2021;146(5):531-537. doi: 10.1159/000517076. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
Distal transradial access for cardiac catheterization: A systematic scoping review.经桡动脉远端入路行心导管术:系统范围界定综述。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;96(7):1381-1389. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28623. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
4
Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm.同一手臂连续使用桡动脉远端通路进行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的可行性与安全性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 15;98(6):E796-E801. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29938. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
5
A Comparative Analysis between Ultrasound-Guided and Conventional Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention.超声引导与传统经桡动脉远端入路在冠状动脉造影及介入治疗中的对比分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Sep 8;2020:7342732. doi: 10.1155/2020/7342732. eCollection 2020.
6
Distal Transradial Access: a Safe and Feasible Approach for Coronary Catheterization in Cases of Total Radial Artery Occlusion.经桡动脉远端入路:在完全性桡动脉闭塞病例中进行冠状动脉造影的安全可行方法。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2022 Oct;15(5):1203-1211. doi: 10.1007/s12265-022-10238-9. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
7
Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion via distal vs. conventional transradial access (CONDITION): a randomized controlled trial.经远端桡动脉与传统桡动脉入路比较桡动脉长期闭塞的情况(CONDITION):一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 8;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03281-7.
8
Feasibility and Safety of the Distal Transradial Artery for Coronary Diagnostic or Interventional Catheterization.经桡动脉远端入路行冠状动脉诊断或介入治疗的可行性和安全性。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Dec 9;2020:4794838. doi: 10.1155/2020/4794838. eCollection 2020.
9
Distal or Traditional Transradial Access Site for Coronary Procedures: A Single-Center, Randomized Study.经远端桡动脉或传统桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗:一项单中心、随机研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.037. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
10
Distal transradial access: a review of the feasibility and safety in cardiovascular angiography and intervention.经桡动脉远端入路:心血管造影和介入治疗的可行性和安全性评价。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01625-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of multifunctional pulse wave sphygmomanometer combined with constant temperature ice in patients with forearm hematoma after coronary intervention.多功能脉搏波血压计联合恒温冰敷在冠状动脉介入术后前臂血肿患者中的应用
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04432-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Distal or Traditional Transradial Access Site for Coronary Procedures: A Single-Center, Randomized Study.经远端桡动脉或传统桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗:一项单中心、随机研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.037. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
2
Distal Transradial Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: An Updated Meta-Analysis.经桡动脉远端入路在前臂解剖鼻烟窝行冠状动脉造影及介入治疗的应用:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Jul 22;2021:7099044. doi: 10.1155/2021/7099044. eCollection 2021.
3
Feasibility and Safety of the Left Distal Radial Approach in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions.
左桡骨远端入路在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗分叉病变中的可行性与安全性
J Clin Med. 2021 May 19;10(10):2204. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102204.
4
Distal Radial Artery Approach to Prevent Radial Artery Occlusion Trial.桡动脉远端入路预防桡动脉闭塞试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 22;14(4):378-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.013.
5
First Results of the Distal Radial Access Doppler Study.桡动脉远端入路多普勒研究的初步结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;14(6):1281-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.11.023. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
Feasibility and Safety of Performing Complex Coronary Interventions by Distal Radial Artery Using the Railway Sheathless Vascular System.经 Railway 无鞘血管系统行经桡动脉行复杂冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性和安全性。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Dec;32(12):459-462. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00201. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
7
A Comparative Analysis between Ultrasound-Guided and Conventional Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention.超声引导与传统经桡动脉远端入路在冠状动脉造影及介入治疗中的对比分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Sep 8;2020:7342732. doi: 10.1155/2020/7342732. eCollection 2020.
8
Transradial access through the anatomical snuffbox: Results of a feasibility study.经解剖鼻烟窝行桡动脉入路:一项可行性研究的结果。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021 May-Jun;62(3):201-205. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
9
Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Japanese multicenter experience.桡动脉远心端入路在冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的有效性和安全性:一项日本多中心经验
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Apr;35(2):162-167. doi: 10.1007/s12928-019-00590-0. Epub 2019 May 24.
10
'Ten commandments' for the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南的“十诫”
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):79-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy855.