Suppr超能文献

重症急性胰腺炎的保守治疗是一种安全的选择——一项长达15年的长期随访队列研究结果

Conservative therapy of severe acute pancreatitis is a safe option - results of a 15-year long-term follow-up cohort study.

作者信息

Alsfasser Guido, Klar Ernst, Feitl Judith, Schafmayer Clemens

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 18;85(5):1556-1561. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000697. eCollection 2023 May.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Treatment of severe acute pancreatitis can be challenging with high mortality. In 2012 we reported a significantly reduced in-hospital mortality if these patients are treated conservatively for at least the first 3 weeks in the course of the disease as compared to early necrosectomy. We performed a long-term follow-up and compared the outcome of these two study groups (group 1 - early necrosectomy, =20 versus group 2 - primary conservative treatment, =24).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Follow-up of the study patients by personal contact, phone survey, or data from primary care physician. Median follow-up was 15 years (range 10-22 years). This trial is registered at: Research Registry UIN researchregistry8697.

RESULTS

Eleven survivors of group 1 and 22 survivors of group 2 were discharged after initial treatment. Ten of 11 surviving patients of group 1 (90.9%) and 20 of 22 surviving patients of group 2 (90.9%) were included in this study. Between groups, there were no statistical differences in the rate of resubmission (=0.23), development of diabetes (=0.78), or development of exocrine insufficiency (=1.0). However, long-term survival in group 2 was significantly better than that of group 1 (=0.049).

CONCLUSION

Primary conservative treatment of severe acute pancreatitis without early necrosectomy does not lead to early complications and even shows an advantage in long-term survival. Therefore conservative treatment of severe acute pancreatitis is safe and there is no absolute need for necrosectomy in severe acute pancreatitis.

摘要

未标注

重症急性胰腺炎的治疗具有挑战性,死亡率很高。2012年我们报告称,与早期坏死组织清除术相比,如果这些患者在疾病过程中至少前3周接受保守治疗,住院死亡率会显著降低。我们进行了长期随访,并比较了这两个研究组(第1组 - 早期坏死组织清除术,n = 20 与第2组 - 初始保守治疗,n = 24)的结果。

材料与方法

通过个人联系、电话调查或初级保健医生的数据对研究患者进行随访。中位随访时间为15年(范围10 - 22年)。该试验已在以下注册:研究注册库UIN researchregistry8697。

结果

第1组的11名幸存者和第2组的22名幸存者在初始治疗后出院。第1组11名存活患者中的10名(90.9%)和第2组22名存活患者中的20名(90.9%)纳入本研究。两组之间,再次入院率(P = 0.23)、糖尿病发生率(P = 0.78)或外分泌功能不全发生率(P = 1.0)无统计学差异。然而,第2组的长期生存率显著优于第1组(P = 0.049)。

结论

重症急性胰腺炎的初始保守治疗而非早期坏死组织清除术不会导致早期并发症,甚至在长期生存方面显示出优势。因此,重症急性胰腺炎的保守治疗是安全的,重症急性胰腺炎并非绝对需要进行坏死组织清除术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4528/10205240/b3efbb2d59fa/ms9-85-1556-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验