He Deling, Buder Eugene H, Bidelman Gavin M
School of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023 May 11;4(2):344-360. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00102. eCollection 2023.
Considerable work suggests the dominant syllable rhythm of the acoustic envelope is remarkably similar across languages (∼4-5 Hz) and that oscillatory brain activity tracks these quasiperiodic rhythms to facilitate speech processing. However, whether this fundamental periodicity represents a common organizing principle in both auditory and motor systems involved in speech has not been explicitly tested. To evaluate relations between entrainment in the perceptual and production domains, we measured individuals' (i) neuroacoustic tracking of the EEG to speech trains and their (ii) simultaneous and non-simultaneous productions synchronized to syllable rates between 2.5 and 8.5 Hz. Productions made without concurrent auditory presentation isolated motor speech functions more purely. We show that neural synchronization flexibly adapts to the heard stimuli in a rate-dependent manner, but that phase locking is boosted near ∼4.5 Hz, the purported dominant rate of speech. Cued speech productions (recruit sensorimotor interaction) were optimal between 2.5 and 4.5 Hz, suggesting a low-frequency constraint on motor output and/or sensorimotor integration. In contrast, "pure" motor productions (without concurrent sound cues) were most precisely generated at rates of 4.5 and 5.5 Hz, paralleling the neuroacoustic data. Correlations further revealed strong links between receptive (EEG) and production synchronization abilities; individuals with stronger auditory-perceptual entrainment better matched speech rhythms motorically. Together, our findings support an intimate link between exogenous and endogenous rhythmic processing that is optimized at 4-5 Hz in both auditory and motor systems. Parallels across modalities could result from dynamics of the speech motor system coupled with experience-dependent tuning of the perceptual system via the sensorimotor interface.
大量研究表明,不同语言的声学包络中占主导地位的音节节奏非常相似(约4-5赫兹),并且大脑的振荡活动会追踪这些准周期性节奏以促进语音处理。然而,这种基本的周期性是否代表了参与语音的听觉和运动系统中的共同组织原则,尚未得到明确验证。为了评估感知和产生领域中的同步关系,我们测量了个体:(i)脑电图对语音序列的神经声学追踪,以及(ii)与2.5至8.5赫兹音节速率同步的同时和非同时发声。在没有同时听觉呈现的情况下进行的发声更纯粹地分离了运动语音功能。我们发现,神经同步以速率依赖的方式灵活地适应所听到的刺激,但在约4.5赫兹(据称的语音主导速率)附近,锁相得到增强。有提示的语音发声(招募感觉运动相互作用)在2.5至4.5赫兹之间是最佳的,这表明对运动输出和/或感觉运动整合存在低频限制。相比之下,“纯粹”的运动发声(没有同时的声音提示)在4.5和5.5赫兹的速率下产生得最为精确,这与神经声学数据一致。相关性进一步揭示了接受性(脑电图)和产生同步能力之间的紧密联系;听觉感知同步较强的个体在运动上能更好地匹配语音节奏。总之,我们的研究结果支持了外源性和内源性节律处理之间的紧密联系,这种联系在听觉和运动系统中均在4-5赫兹时达到最佳状态。不同模态之间的相似性可能源于语音运动系统的动态变化,以及通过感觉运动接口对感知系统进行的经验依赖性调整。