Department of General Surgery, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, India.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Aug;33(8):728-737. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0072. Epub 2023 May 25.
Minimally invasive and endoscopic surgical techniques have surpassed the conventional open thyroidectomy for the treatment of thyroid nodules. Trans-axillary, Unilateral Axillo-Breast Approach (UABA), Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach, and Trans-Oral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach (TOETVA) are the most common endoscopic procedures performed currently. This article highlights our experiences with UABA and TOETVA over a period of 6 years. Between January 2015 and December 2020, we retrospectively analyzed our experience in Endoscopic thyroidectomy with 119 patients using UABA ( = 72) and TOETVA ( = 47) in our tertiary care teaching hospital. Both approaches used the standard three-port technique. Real time angiography was performed intraoperatively using Indocyanine Green dye to delineate the vessels in all patients. The mean operative time for UABA and TOETVA was 90 and 110 minutes, respectively. Estimated blood loss was 18 mL in the former and 20 mL in the latter. Temporary Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve palsy and Hypoparathyroidism were minimal with TOETVA (5 patients versus 4 patients and 7 patients versus 2 patients). Shorter duration of hospital stay was observed with UABA (3 days versus 5 days). Cosmetic satisfaction was better with TOETVA. Based on our 6-year experience, we propose "JJ Hospital Criteria," which we currently follow to decide which surgical approach will yield best results. UABA and TOETVA are safe, feasible, and give exceptional cosmetic satisfaction. Both approaches should be seen as complementary rather than competitive.
微创和内镜外科技术已经超越了传统的开放式甲状腺切除术,成为治疗甲状腺结节的首选方法。经腋窝入路、单侧腋窝-乳房入路(UABA)、双侧腋窝-乳房入路和经口腔内镜甲状腺切除术前庭入路(TOETVA)是目前最常见的内镜手术方法。本文重点介绍了我们在过去 6 年中使用 UABA 和 TOETVA 的经验。在 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,我们回顾性分析了在我们的三级教学医院使用 UABA(n=72)和 TOETVA(n=47)进行内镜甲状腺切除术的 119 例患者的经验。两种方法均采用标准的三孔技术。术中使用吲哚菁绿染料进行实时血管造影,以显影所有患者的血管。UABA 和 TOETVA 的平均手术时间分别为 90 分钟和 110 分钟。前者的估计失血量为 18 毫升,后者为 20 毫升。TOETVA 组暂时性喉返神经麻痹和甲状旁腺功能减退症的发生率较低(5 例与 4 例,7 例与 2 例)。UABA 组的住院时间较短(3 天与 5 天)。TOETVA 的美容满意度更好。根据我们 6 年的经验,我们提出了“JJ 医院标准”,目前我们根据这些标准来决定哪种手术方法能取得最佳效果。UABA 和 TOETVA 是安全、可行的,并且能获得极好的美容满意度。这两种方法应该被视为互补的,而不是竞争的。