Papaioannou D J, Kaklamani E P, Parissis N G, Koumantaki I G, Karalis D T, Trichopoulos D B
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1986 Jun;54(2):245-51.
The prevalence of HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc in the sera of 217 patients with the two polar types of leprosy and 382 hospital controls was studied in order to investigate the degree of exposure of Greek leprosy patients to HBV and the ability of these patients to clear HBV from the blood. Two distinct serological patterns were analyzed: effective exposure, characterized by the presence of one or more of the three serological markers, and active infection, characterized by the presence of HBsAg. From the statistical analysis it was found that TT as well as LL cases had a higher prevalence of effective exposure in comparison to controls (p less than 10(-5) and p less than 10(-6)). No significant difference was found between the two polar leprosy types (p greater than 0.30) or between bacteriologically positive and negative LL cases (p greater than 0.30). As far as the prevalence of active infection is concerned among the effectively exposed subjects of all groups, no significant difference existed between TT cases and controls, LL cases and controls, the two polar leprosy cases combined and controls, the two polar leprosy groups, and LL cases positive and negative for Mycobacterium leprae (p for all comparisons greater than 0.30). It is concluded that leprosy cases are at a high risk of HBV infection, but the prevalence of active infection among those effectively exposed does not differ between leprosy cases and hospital controls.
为了调查希腊麻风病患者感染乙肝病毒(HBV)的程度以及这些患者从血液中清除HBV的能力,研究了217例两种极型麻风病患者和382例医院对照者血清中乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)、乙肝表面抗体(抗-HBs)和乙肝核心抗体(抗-HBc)的流行情况。分析了两种不同的血清学模式:有效暴露,其特征为三种血清学标志物中一种或多种阳性;活动性感染,其特征为HBsAg阳性。通过统计分析发现,与对照组相比,瘤型(TT)和界线类偏瘤型(LL)病例的有效暴露流行率更高(p<10⁻⁵和p<10⁻⁶)。两种极型麻风病类型之间(p>0.30)或细菌学阳性和阴性的LL病例之间(p>0.30)未发现显著差异。就所有组有效暴露者中的活动性感染流行率而言,TT病例与对照组、LL病例与对照组、两种极型麻风病病例合并与对照组、两种极型麻风病组以及麻风杆菌阳性和阴性的LL病例之间均无显著差异(所有比较的p>0.30)。结论是,麻风病患者有较高的HBV感染风险,但有效暴露者中活动性感染的流行率在麻风病患者和医院对照者之间没有差异。