• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺囊液生物标志物的预测能力:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Predictive ability of pancreatic cyst fluid biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery CCM|CVK, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Graduate School of Life Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Pancreatology. 2023 Nov;23(7):868-877. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2023.05.005
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mucinous pancreatic cysts harbor the potential to progress to highly lethal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Since these precursor cysts require cancer surveillance or surgical resection, they need to be reliably distinguished from harmless pancreatic cysts. Current clinical and radiographic assessment is imperfect and the value of cyst fluid analysis for differential diagnosis is unclear. Therefore, we set out to investigate the value of cyst fluid biomarkers in distinguishing pancreatic cysts.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the current literature to identify articles that evaluated the diagnostic performance of clinically relevant and promising candidate cyst fluid biomarkers, with a particular emphasis on DNA-based biomarkers. Meta-analysis was performed for biomarkers targeted at identifying cyst type and presence of high-grade dysplasia or PDAC.

RESULTS

Data from a total of 42 studies was analyzed. Mutations in KRAS and/or GNAS allowed identification of mucinous cysts with a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 98%. This exceeded the performance of the traditional biomarker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; sensitivity 58%, specificity 87%). Mutations in VHL were specific for serous cystadenomas (SCAs; sensitivity 56%, specificity 99%) and help to exclude mucinous cysts. Mutations in CDKN2A, PIK3CA, SMAD4, and TP53 each had high specificities of 97%, 97%, 98%, and 95%, respectively, to identify high-grade dysplasia or PDAC in mucinous cysts.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyst fluid analysis can be a valuable tool in the characterization of pancreatic cysts, with relevant clinical implications. Our results support the use of DNA-based cyst fluid biomarkers in the multidisciplinary diagnostic work-up of pancreatic cysts.

摘要

背景

黏液性胰腺囊肿有进展为高度致命的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的潜力。由于这些前体囊肿需要癌症监测或手术切除,因此需要将其与无害的胰腺囊肿可靠地区分开来。目前的临床和影像学评估并不完善,囊液分析在鉴别诊断中的价值也不清楚。因此,我们着手研究囊液生物标志物在鉴别胰腺囊肿方面的价值。

方法

我们对当前文献进行了系统回顾,以确定评估临床相关和有前途的候选囊液生物标志物诊断性能的文章,特别强调基于 DNA 的生物标志物。对用于识别囊肿类型以及存在高级别发育不良或 PDAC 的生物标志物进行了荟萃分析。

结果

共分析了 42 项研究的数据。KRAS 和/或 GNAS 的突变可识别黏液性囊肿,其敏感性为 79%,特异性为 98%。这优于传统标志物癌胚抗原(CEA;敏感性 58%,特异性 87%)的性能。VHL 的突变特异性针对浆液性囊腺瘤(SCA;敏感性 56%,特异性 99%),有助于排除黏液性囊肿。CDKN2A、PIK3CA、SMAD4 和 TP53 的突变分别具有 97%、97%、98%和 95%的高特异性,可识别黏液性囊肿中的高级别发育不良或 PDAC。

结论

囊液分析可以成为胰腺囊肿特征描述的一种有价值的工具,具有相关的临床意义。我们的研究结果支持在胰腺囊肿的多学科诊断工作中使用基于 DNA 的囊液生物标志物。

相似文献

1
Predictive ability of pancreatic cyst fluid biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胰腺囊液生物标志物的预测能力:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pancreatology. 2023 Nov;23(7):868-877. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 15.
2
Impact of next-generation sequencing on the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cysts.下一代测序技术对胰腺囊肿临床诊断的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.047. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
3
American Gastroenterological Association guidelines are inaccurate in detecting pancreatic cysts with advanced neoplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 225 patients with supporting molecular data.美国胃肠病学会指南在检测具有高级别肿瘤性的胰腺囊肿方面存在不准确性:一项包含支持分子数据的 225 例患者的临床病理研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1107-1117.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
4
Preoperative next-generation sequencing of pancreatic cyst fluid is highly accurate in cyst classification and detection of advanced neoplasia.术前对胰腺囊液进行下一代测序,在囊液分类和检测高级别肿瘤方面具有高度准确性。
Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2131-2141. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313586. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
5
Preoperative GNAS and KRAS testing in the diagnosis of pancreatic mucinous cysts.术前 GNAS 和 KRAS 检测在胰腺黏液性囊腺瘤/囊腺癌诊断中的应用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Aug 15;20(16):4381-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0513. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
6
Value of adding GNAS testing to pancreatic cyst fluid KRAS and carcinoembryonic antigen analysis for the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.对胰囊液 KRAS 和癌胚抗原分析中添加 GNAS 检测用于诊断导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的价值。
Dig Endosc. 2017 Jan;29(1):111-117. doi: 10.1111/den.12710. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
7
Performance characteristics of molecular (DNA) analysis for the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cysts.用于诊断黏液性胰腺囊肿的分子(DNA)分析的性能特征。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jan;79(1):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
8
Next-generation sequencing improves diagnostic accuracy of imaging and carcinoembryonic antigen alone for pancreatic cystic neoplasms.下一代测序提高了仅依靠影像学和癌胚抗原对胰腺囊性肿瘤的诊断准确性。
Pancreatology. 2024 Dec;24(8):1322-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.006. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
9
Cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen is an accurate diagnostic marker of pancreatic mucinous cysts.囊液癌胚抗原是胰腺黏液性囊腺瘤的准确诊断标志物。
Pancreas. 2011 Oct;40(7):1024-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31821bd62f.
10
Lower cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen cutoff is helpful in the differential diagnosis of mucinous versus non-mucinous pancreatic cysts.较低的囊液癌胚抗原临界值有助于鉴别黏液性与非黏液性胰腺囊肿。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug;41(4):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01269-w. Epub 2022 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Neoplastic Versus Non-neoplastic Pancreatic Cystic Lesions-What Is the Current Evidence?鉴别胰腺囊性肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变——当前有哪些证据?
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09320-4.
2
Differentiating Main-Duct IPMN from Chronic Pancreatitis Using Next-Generation Sequencing of Main Pancreatic Duct Fluid: A Pilot Study.利用主胰管液的下一代测序技术鉴别主胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤与慢性胰腺炎:一项初步研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;15(15):1964. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151964.
3
Evolving techniques in the endoscopic evaluation and management of pancreas cystic lesions.
胰腺囊性病变内镜评估与管理的技术进展
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2025 Sep 1;41(5):339-347. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000001119. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
4
Early neoplastic lesions of the pancreas: initiation, progression, and opportunities for precancer interception.胰腺早期肿瘤性病变:起始、进展及癌前阻断机会
J Clin Invest. 2025 Jul 15;135(14). doi: 10.1172/JCI191937.
5
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Cystic Fluid Biochemical and Genetic Analysis for the Differentiation Between Mucinous and Non-Mucinous Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.内镜超声引导下胰腺囊性液生化及基因分析用于鉴别黏液性和非黏液性胰腺囊性病变
J Clin Med. 2025 May 29;14(11):3825. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113825.
6
Towards automating risk stratification of intraductal papillary mucinous Neoplasms: Artificial intelligence advances beyond human expertise with confocal laser endomicroscopy.迈向导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤风险分层的自动化:人工智能借助共聚焦激光内镜超越人类专业知识。
Pancreatology. 2025 Aug;25(5):658-666. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2025.05.011. Epub 2025 May 21.
7
Early Detection of Sporadic Pancreatic Cancer.散发性胰腺癌的早期检测
Visc Med. 2025 Mar 28:1-4. doi: 10.1159/000545424.
8
Histologic Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions with Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Biopsy and Impact on Management Decisions.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检对胰腺囊性病变的组织学诊断及其对治疗决策的影响
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09056-1.
9
Role of Endoscopy in Clinical Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.内镜检查在导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤临床管理中的作用
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 May;40(5):1045-1058. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16938. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
10
Spatial Transcriptomics of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms Reveals Divergent Indolent and Malignant States.导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的空间转录组学揭示了不同的惰性和恶性状态。
Clin Cancer Res. 2025 May 1;31(9):1796-1808. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1529.