Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Oct;80(5):519-529. doi: 10.1177/10775587231173474. Epub 2023 May 26.
Amid enthusiasm about accountable care organizations (ACOs) in Medicaid, little is known about the primary care practices engaging in them. We leverage a survey of administrators within a random sample (stratified by ACO) of 225 practices joining Massachusetts Medicaid ACOs (64% response rate; 225 responses). We measure the integration of processes with distinct entities: consulting clinicians, eye specialists for diabetes care, mental/behavioral care providers, and long-term and social services agencies. Using multivariable regression, we examine organizational correlates of integration and assess integration's relationships with care quality improvement, health equity, and satisfaction with the ACO. Integration varied across practices. Clinical integration was positively associated with perceived care quality improvement; social service integration was positively associated with addressing equity; and mental/behavioral and long-term service integration were positively associated with ACO satisfaction (all < .05). Understanding differences in integration at the practice level is vital for sharpening policy, setting expectations, and supporting improvement in Medicaid ACOs.
在医改优惠计划中的问责制医疗组织(ACO)备受关注的背景下,人们对参与其中的初级保健实践知之甚少。我们利用对马萨诸塞州医改优惠计划 ACO 中随机抽样(按 ACO 分层)的 225 家实践的管理员进行的调查(回应率为 64%;共收到 225 份回应)。我们衡量了与不同实体整合的过程:顾问临床医生、糖尿病护理眼科专家、精神/行为保健提供者以及长期和社会服务机构。我们使用多变量回归分析,研究了整合的组织相关性,并评估了整合与医疗质量改进、健康公平以及对 ACO 的满意度之间的关系。整合在实践之间存在差异。临床整合与感知的医疗质量改进呈正相关;社会服务整合与解决公平问题呈正相关;精神/行为和长期服务整合与 ACO 的满意度呈正相关(均<.05)。了解实践层面的整合差异对于完善政策、设定预期以及支持医改优惠计划 ACO 的改进至关重要。