Department of Human Reproductive Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2023 Dec;39(1):2217263. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2023.2217263.
To compare the effects of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol and GnRH-a long protocol in infertility patients with normal ovarian reserve function undergoing invitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 2013 cycles of patients with normal ovarian reserve function who underwent invitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) in the Department of Human Reproductive Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine from January 2018 and June 2020. The PPOS protocol group included 679 cycles and GnRH-along protocol group included 1334 cycles, the pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups.
The duration of Gn used and total Gn used dosage in the PPOS protocol group were less than those in the GnRH-along protocol group (Duration of Gn used: 10.05 ± 1.48 vs 11.90 ± 1.85 d, < 0.001; Total Gn used dosage: 1944.49 ± 533.61 vs 2661.34 ± 987.97 IU, < 0.001); The LH levels were significantly higher on HCG trigger day in PPOS protocol compared to GnRH-a long protocol (2.8 ± 1 ± 1.07 vs 1.01 ± 0.62 IU/L, < 0.001), the E2 levels on HCG trigger day in PPOS protocol group was lower than that in the GnRH-a long protocol group (2135.92 ± 1387.00 vs 2417.01 ± 1010.70 pg/mL, < 0. 001). The number of oocytes retrieved in the PPOS protocol group was lower than that in the GnRH-along protocol group (8.03 ± 2.86 vs 9.47 ± 2.64, < 0.001). No significant differences were found in pregnancy outcome including clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate between the two group ( > 0.05); In addition, no severe OHSS occurred in the PPOS protocol group during ovulation induction, while 11 patients of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred in GnRH-a long protocol group ( < 0.001).
The clinical efficacy of PPOS protocol combining embryo cryopreservation is comparable to that of GnRH-a long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function, and the PPOS protocol is able to reduce the incidence of severe OHSS significantly.
比较孕激素预处理促排卵(PPOS)方案和 GnRH-a 长方案在卵巢储备功能正常的不孕患者行体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)中的疗效。
采用回顾性队列研究分析 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月湖北医药学院附属人民医院生殖医学中心行 IVF/ICSI-ET 的 2013 个卵巢储备功能正常患者的临床资料。PPOS 方案组 679 个周期,GnRH-a 长方案组 1334 个周期,比较两组患者的妊娠结局。
PPOS 方案组 Gn 使用时间和总 Gn 使用剂量均少于 GnRH-a 长方案组(Gn 使用时间:10.05±1.48 比 11.90±1.85 d, < 0.001;总 Gn 使用剂量:1944.49±533.61 比 2661.34±987.97 IU, < 0.001);PPOS 方案组患者 HCG 扳机日 LH 水平显著高于 GnRH-a 长方案组(2.8±1.01±1.07 比 1.01±0.62 IU/L, < 0.001),PPOS 方案组 HCG 扳机日 E2 水平低于 GnRH-a 长方案组(2135.92±1387.00 比 2417.01±1010.70 pg/mL, < 0.001)。PPOS 方案组获卵数少于 GnRH-a 长方案组(8.03±2.86 比 9.47±2.64, < 0.001)。两组患者的临床妊娠率、早期流产率、异位妊娠率等妊娠结局差异均无统计学意义( > 0.05);此外,PPOS 方案组在促排卵过程中未发生严重卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS),而 GnRH-a 长方案组发生 11 例严重 OHSS( < 0.001)。
PPOS 方案联合胚胎冷冻在卵巢储备功能正常患者中的临床疗效与 GnRH-a 长方案相当,且能显著降低严重 OHSS 的发生率。