Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Bairro Swift, Campinas, CEP: 13045-755, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dental School São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Bairro Swift, Campinas, CEP: 13045-755, São Paulo, Brazil.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2023 Jun;42:103631. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103631. Epub 2023 May 24.
Dental color change and the temperature of the pulp chamber and of the buccal surface were evaluated during bleaching with 37% carbamide peroxide (CP) with continuous vs fractionated violet LED light protocols.
Bovine incisors received in-office bleaching for 30 min using different light protocols (Bright Max Whitening, MMOptics). Teeth were separated into groups (n = 10): HP) 35% hydrogen peroxide (Whiteness HP, FGM)/no light; CP) 37% carbamide peroxide (Whiteness SuperEndo, FGM)/no light; CP10) CP+10 min of continuous light; CP20) CP+20 min of continuous light; CP30) CP+30 min of continuous light; CPF) CP+20 cycles of 60 s light / 30 s no light (fractionated). Color evaluations were performed at different times. Evaluations of pulp and buccal surface temperatures were performed before and throughout the 30 min of bleaching.
Generalized linear models for repeated measures over time were applied to the data (α=5%). After the 1st session, CP20 and CP30 had significantly lower b* values than CP and CP10 (p = 0.0071). For ΔE and ΔE, CPF, CP20 and CP30 showed the highest color change among the treatments after the third bleaching (p<0.05). For temperature evaluations, CP30 showed higher pulp and buccal surface temperatures than the other protocols (p<0.0001) after 20 min.
Fractionated or continuous application of violet LED for 20 or 30 min leads to greater effectiveness of color change. All protocols with the application of LED led to an increase in pulp and buccal surface temperatures during bleaching, although the fractionated application appeared to be safer than the use of continuous light.
本研究评估了使用 37%过氧化氢(CP)和连续或间断式紫外交联灯进行诊室漂白时,牙髓腔和颊面温度的变化以及牙齿颜色变化。
牛切牙使用不同的光照方案(Bright Max 美白仪,MMOptics)进行 30 分钟的诊室漂白。将牙齿分为以下几组(n=10):HP)35%过氧化氢(Whiteness HP,FGM)/无光照;CP)37%脲素过氧化物(Whiteness SuperEndo,FGM)/无光照;CP10)CP+10 分钟连续光照;CP20)CP+20 分钟连续光照;CP30)CP+30 分钟连续光照;CPF)CP+20 个 60 秒光照/30 秒无光照循环(间断式)。在不同时间进行颜色评估。在漂白的 30 分钟内,评估牙髓和颊面温度。
采用时间重复广义线性模型对数据进行分析(α=5%)。第一次治疗后,CP20 和 CP30 的 b*值明显低于 CP 和 CP10(p=0.0071)。在第三次漂白后,CPF、CP20 和 CP30 在所有处理组中表现出最高的颜色变化(p<0.05)。对于温度评估,在 20 分钟后,CP30 显示出比其他方案更高的牙髓和颊面温度(p<0.0001)。
间断或连续使用紫外交联灯 20 或 30 分钟可显著提高颜色变化的效果。所有应用 LED 的方案在漂白过程中都会导致牙髓和颊面温度升高,尽管间断式应用似乎比连续光照更安全。