• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后开放和血管内锁骨下动脉旁路干预的长期结果显示肢体功能障碍发生率高。

Long-Term Outcomes of Open and Endovascular Axillosubclavian Interventions After Traumatic Injury Reveal High Rates of Limb Dysfunction.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM.

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Nov;97:392-398. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.013. Epub 2023 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.013
PMID:37236534
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Arterial axillosubclavian injuries (ASIs) are currently managed with open repair (OR) and endovascular stenting (ES). The long-term prognosis of patients with these and associated brachial plexus injuries is poorly understood. We hypothesize that OR and ES for ASI have similar long-term patency rates and that brachial plexus injuries would confer high long-term morbidity.

METHODS

All patients at a level-1 trauma center who underwent procedures for ASI over a 12-year period (2010 to 2022) were identified. Long-term outcomes of patency rates, types of reintervention, rates of brachial plexus injury, and functional outcomes were then investigated.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients underwent operations for ASI. OR was performed in 72.7% (n = 24) and ES in 27.3% (n = 9). ES patency was 85.7% (n = 6/7) and OR patency was 75% (n = 12/16), at a median follow-up of 20 and 5.5 months respectively. In subclavian artery injuries, ES patency was 100% (n = 4/4) and OR patency was 50% (n = 4/8) at a median follow-up of 24 and 12 months respectively. Long-term patency rates were similar between OR and ES (P = 1.0). Brachial plexus injuries occurred in 42.9% (n = 12/28) of patients. Ninety percent (n = 9/10) of patients with brachial plexus injuries who were followed postdischarge had persistent motor deficits at median follow-up of 12 months, occurring at significantly higher rates in patients with brachial plexus injuries (90%) compared to those without brachial plexus injuries (14.3%) (P = 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiyear follow-up demonstrates similar OR and ES patency rates for ASI. Subclavian ES patency was excellent (100%) and prosthetic subclavian bypass patency was poor (25%). brachial plexus injuries were common (42.9%) and devastating, with a significant portion of patients having persistent limb motor deficits (45.8%) on long-term follow-up. Algorithms to optimize brachial plexus injuries management for patients with ASI are high-yield, and likely to influence long-term outcomes more than the technique of initial revascularization.

摘要

背景

目前,腋动脉锁骨下动脉损伤(ASIs)的治疗方法是开放修复(OR)和血管内支架置入术(ES)。这些损伤和相关臂丛神经损伤患者的长期预后尚不清楚。我们假设 OR 和 ES 治疗 ASI 的长期通畅率相似,而臂丛神经损伤则会导致高长期发病率。

方法

在 12 年期间(2010 年至 2022 年),在一家一级创伤中心对所有接受 ASI 治疗的患者进行了手术。然后,研究了通畅率、再干预类型、臂丛神经损伤发生率和功能结局的长期结果。

结果

33 例患者接受了 ASI 手术。72.7%(n=24)行 OR,27.3%(n=9)行 ES。ES 的通畅率为 85.7%(n=6/7),OR 的通畅率为 75%(n=12/16),中位随访时间分别为 20 个月和 5.5 个月。锁骨下动脉损伤患者中,ES 的通畅率为 100%(n=4/4),OR 的通畅率为 50%(n=4/8),中位随访时间分别为 24 个月和 12 个月。OR 和 ES 的长期通畅率相似(P=1.0)。42.9%(n=28)的患者发生臂丛神经损伤。90%(n=9/10)出院后随访的臂丛神经损伤患者在 12 个月的中位随访时仍存在运动功能障碍,臂丛神经损伤患者的发生率明显高于无臂丛神经损伤患者(90%比 14.3%)(P=0.0005)。

结论

多年随访显示 ASI 的 OR 和 ES 通畅率相似。锁骨下动脉 ES 通畅率极好(100%),而人工锁骨下旁路通畅率较差(25%)。臂丛神经损伤很常见(42.9%),且具有破坏性,相当一部分患者在长期随访中仍存在肢体运动功能障碍(45.8%)。优化 ASI 患者臂丛神经损伤管理的算法是高收益的,可能比初次血运重建技术更能影响长期结果。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes of Open and Endovascular Axillosubclavian Interventions After Traumatic Injury Reveal High Rates of Limb Dysfunction.创伤后开放和血管内锁骨下动脉旁路干预的长期结果显示肢体功能障碍发生率高。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Nov;97:392-398. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.013. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Analysis of Traumatic Axillo-Subclavian Vessel Injuries: Endovascular Management is a Viable Option to Open Surgical Reconstruction.创伤性腋-锁骨下血管损伤的分析:血管内治疗是开放性手术重建的可行选择。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;79:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.07.047. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
3
Editor's Choice - In Hospital and Long Term Outcomes After Repair of Subclavian and Axillary Artery Injuries.编辑推荐——锁骨下动脉和腋动脉损伤修复后的院内及长期预后
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Dec;66(6):840-847. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.08.008. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
4
Humerus fracture and combined venous injury increases limb loss in axillary or subclavian artery injury.肱骨骨折合并静脉损伤会增加腋动脉或锁骨下动脉损伤时的肢体缺失风险。
Vascular. 2019 Jun;27(3):252-259. doi: 10.1177/1708538118811231. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
5
Outcome comparison between open and endovascular management of axillosubclavian arterial injuries.腋-锁骨下动脉损伤开放手术与血管腔内治疗的疗效比较
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Mar;63(3):702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.117. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
Long-term functional outcomes of upper extremity civilian vascular trauma.上肢民用血管创伤的长期功能结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):526-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.028. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
7
Long-term patency of surgical left subclavian artery revascularization.外科手术重建左侧锁骨下动脉的长期通畅率。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1977-1984.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.12.078. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
8
Contemporary outcomes of traumatic popliteal artery injury repair from the popliteal scoring assessment for vascular extremity injury in trauma study.创伤研究中肢体血管损伤腘动脉评分评估的创伤性腘动脉损伤修复的当代结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Nov;74(5):1573-1580.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.064. Epub 2021 May 21.
9
Long-term outcomes after pediatric peripheral revascularization secondary to trauma at an urban level I center.城市一级创伤中心儿童外周血运重建后长期结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):857-862. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.029. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
10
Limb Salvage Does Not Predict Functional Limb Outcome after Revascularization for Traumatic Acute Limb Ischemia.保肢不能预测创伤性急性肢体缺血血管重建术后的肢体功能结局。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:220-224. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.068. Epub 2019 Oct 30.