• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负压伤口治疗与标准敷料用于小儿手足烧伤的可行性研究方案:一项单中心试点随机对照试验

The feasibility of negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings in paediatric hand and foot burns protocol: a pilot, single-centre, randomised control trial.

作者信息

Lumsden Emma, Kimble Roy, McMillan Catherine, Storey Kristen, Ware Robert S, Griffin Bronwyn

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.

Queensland Children's Hospital, Stanley St., South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 May 26;9(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01308-z.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-023-01308-z
PMID:37237316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10214590/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The goal of paediatric hand and foot burn management is hypertrophic scar and/or contracture prevention. The risk of scar formation may be minimised by integrating negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) as an acute care adjunct as it decreases the time to re-epithelialisation. NPWT has known associated therapeutic burden; however, this burden is hypothesised to be outweighed by an increased likelihood of hypertrophic scar prevention. This study will assess the feasibility, acceptability and safety of NPWT in paediatric hand and foot burns with secondary outcomes of time to re-epithelialisation, pain, itch, cost and scar formation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-site, pilot randomised control trial. Participants must be aged ≤ 16 years, otherwise well and managed within 24 h of sustaining either a hand or foot burn. Thirty participants will be randomised to either standard care (Mepitel®-a silicone wound interface contact dressing-and ACTICOAT™-a nanocrystalline silver-impregnated dressing) or standard care plus NPWT. Patients will be reviewed until 3 months post-burn wound re-epithelialisation, with measurements taken at dressing changes to assess primary and secondary outcomes. Surveys, randomisation and data storage will be done via online platforms and physical data storage collated at the Centre for Children's Health Research, Brisbane, Australia. Analysis will be performed using the Stata statistical software.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Queensland Health and Griffith University Human Research ethics approval including a site-specific assessment was obtained. The findings of this study will be disseminated through clinical meetings, conference presentations and peer reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000044729, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=381890&isReview=true , registered 17/01/2022).

摘要

引言

小儿手足烧伤管理的目标是预防瘢痕增生和/或挛缩。通过将负压伤口治疗(NPWT)作为急性护理辅助手段,可以将瘢痕形成的风险降至最低,因为它可以缩短上皮再形成的时间。NPWT已知存在相关的治疗负担;然而,据推测,这种负担会被预防瘢痕增生可能性的增加所抵消。本研究将评估NPWT在小儿手足烧伤中的可行性、可接受性和安全性,次要结果包括上皮再形成时间、疼痛、瘙痒、成本和瘢痕形成。

方法与分析

这是一项单中心的试点随机对照试验。参与者年龄必须≤16岁,身体健康,且在手部或足部烧伤后24小时内接受治疗。30名参与者将被随机分为标准护理组(美皮康®——一种硅胶伤口界面接触敷料——和爱康肤银™——一种含纳米晶银的敷料)或标准护理加NPWT组。患者将接受随访,直至烧伤创面上皮再形成后3个月,在换药时进行测量,以评估主要和次要结果。调查、随机分组和数据存储将通过在线平台进行,实体数据存储在澳大利亚布里斯班儿童健康研究中心进行整理。分析将使用Stata统计软件进行。

伦理与传播

已获得昆士兰卫生和格里菲斯大学人类研究伦理批准,包括特定地点评估。本研究的结果将通过临床会议、会议报告和同行评审期刊进行传播。

试验注册

已在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心注册(ACTRN12622000044729,https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=381890&isReview=true ,于2022年1月17日注册)。

相似文献

1
The feasibility of negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings in paediatric hand and foot burns protocol: a pilot, single-centre, randomised control trial.负压伤口治疗与标准敷料用于小儿手足烧伤的可行性研究方案:一项单中心试点随机对照试验
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 May 26;9(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01308-z.
2
Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns.PICO 装置(负压伤口治疗)治疗急性儿科烧伤的可行性、可接受性和安全性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 3;13(5):e068499. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068499.
3
Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol.Biobrane®、RECELL® 自体皮肤细胞悬液和银敷料在小儿浅度烧伤中的比较效果:BRACS 随机试验方案
Burns Trauma. 2019 Oct 31;7:33. doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0165-0. eCollection 2019.
4
Study of negative pressure wound therapy as an adjunct treatment for acute burns in children (SONATA in C): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.儿童急性烧伤负压伤口治疗辅助治疗研究(SONATA in C):一项随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2019 Feb 13;20(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3223-9.
5
Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.三种不同敷料治疗儿童部分厚度烧伤的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Nov 25;14:403. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-403.
6
Effectiveness of a hydrogel dressing as an analgesic adjunct to first aid for the treatment of acute paediatric thermal burn injuries: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.水凝胶敷料作为急性小儿热烧伤急救镇痛辅助手段的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Jan 6;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3057-x.
7
Effectiveness of a Regenerative Epithelial Suspension (RES), on the pigmentation of split-thickness skin graft donor sites in children: the dsing pilot randomised controlled trial protocol.再生上皮悬浮液(RES)治疗儿童刃厚皮片供皮区色素沉着的有效性:一项双盲随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 27;14(2):e077525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077525.
8
Prospective randomised controlled trial of Algisite™ M, Cuticerin™, and Sorbact® as donor site dressings in paediatric split-thickness skin grafts.关于Algisite™ M、Cuticerin™和Sorbact®作为小儿中厚皮片供皮区敷料的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Burns Trauma. 2018 Nov 27;6:33. doi: 10.1186/s41038-018-0135-y. eCollection 2018.
9
Randomized clinical trial of negative pressure wound therapy as an adjunctive treatment for small-area thermal burns in children.负压伤口疗法治疗儿童小面积热力烧伤的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2020 Dec;107(13):1741-1750. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11993. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
10
Effectiveness of a hydrogel dressing as an analgesic adjunct to first aid for the treatment of acute paediatric burn injuries: a prospective randomised controlled trial.水凝胶敷料作为急救治疗儿童急性烧伤的辅助镇痛剂的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e039981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039981.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy in paediatric burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.负压伤口治疗在小儿烧伤中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05302-z.
2
Implementation of negative pressure for acute pediatric burns (INPREP): A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial protocol.儿童急性烧伤负压治疗(INPREP):一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验方案
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 10;19(12):e0315278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315278. eCollection 2024.
3
Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of the epidemiology of isolated and non-isolated hand burns.孤立性手部烧伤与非孤立性手部烧伤的流行病学比较。
Burns. 2023 Jun;49(4):951-960. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.05.018. Epub 2022 May 21.
2
Paediatric Burns of the Hand: Our Experience Over Three Years.小儿手部烧伤:我们三年来的经验
Cureus. 2021 Oct 22;13(10):e18970. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18970. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Effectiveness of a hydrogel dressing as an analgesic adjunct to first aid for the treatment of acute paediatric burn injuries: a prospective randomised controlled trial.
PICO 装置(负压伤口治疗)治疗急性儿科烧伤的可行性、可接受性和安全性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 3;13(5):e068499. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068499.
水凝胶敷料作为急救治疗儿童急性烧伤的辅助镇痛剂的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e039981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039981.
4
Risk factors associated with higher pain levels among pediatric burn patients: a retrospective cohort study.与儿科烧伤患者更高疼痛水平相关的风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Mar;46(3):222-227. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101691. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
5
Randomized clinical trial of negative pressure wound therapy as an adjunctive treatment for small-area thermal burns in children.负压伤口疗法治疗儿童小面积热力烧伤的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2020 Dec;107(13):1741-1750. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11993. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
6
Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol.Biobrane®、RECELL® 自体皮肤细胞悬液和银敷料在小儿浅度烧伤中的比较效果:BRACS 随机试验方案
Burns Trauma. 2019 Oct 31;7:33. doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0165-0. eCollection 2019.
7
A comparison study of methods for estimation of a burn surface area: Lund and Browder, e-burn and Mersey Burns.烧伤面积估算方法的比较研究:Lund 和 Browder、e-burn 和 Mersey Burns。
Burns. 2020 Mar;46(2):483-489. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
The Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (child and young person version) for measuring health-related quality of life in children with burn scars: A longitudinal cohort study of reliability, validity and responsiveness.布里斯班烧伤瘢痕影响量表(儿童和青少年版)用于测量烧伤瘢痕儿童的健康相关生活质量:一项可靠性、有效性和反应性的纵向队列研究。
Burns. 2019 Nov;45(7):1537-1552. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
9
Implementation science: What is it and why should I care?实施科学:它是什么,为什么我应该关心?
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112376. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
Prospective randomised controlled trial of Algisite™ M, Cuticerin™, and Sorbact® as donor site dressings in paediatric split-thickness skin grafts.关于Algisite™ M、Cuticerin™和Sorbact®作为小儿中厚皮片供皮区敷料的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Burns Trauma. 2018 Nov 27;6:33. doi: 10.1186/s41038-018-0135-y. eCollection 2018.