Demirel Ozan, Berezin Alexander E, Mirna Moritz, Boxhammer Elke, Gharibeh Sarah X, Hoppe Uta C, Lichtenauer Michael
Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Internal Medicine Department, Zaporozhye State Medical University, 69035 Zaporozhye, Ukraine.
Biomedicines. 2023 May 16;11(5):1452. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11051452.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with atrial remodeling, cardiac dysfunction, and poor clinical outcomes. External direct current electrical cardioversion is a well-developed urgent treatment strategy for patients presenting with recent-onset AF. However, there is a lack of accurate predictive serum biomarkers to identify the risks of AF relapse after electrical cardioversion. We reviewed the currently available data and interpreted the findings of several studies revealing biomarkers for crucial elements in the pathogenesis of AF and affecting cardiac remodeling, fibrosis, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, adipose tissue dysfunction, myopathy, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Although there is ample strong evidence that elevated levels of numerous biomarkers (such as natriuretic peptides, C-reactive protein, galectin-3, soluble suppressor tumorigenicity-2, fibroblast growth factor-23, turn-over collagen biomarkers, growth differential factor-15) are associated with AF occurrence, the data obtained in clinical studies seem to be controversial in terms of their predictive ability for post-cardioversion outcomes. Novel circulating biomarkers are needed to elucidate the modality of this approach compared with conventional predictive tools. Conclusions: Biomarker-based strategies for predicting events after AF treatment require extensive investigation in the future, especially in the presence of different gender and variable comorbidity profiles. Perhaps, a multiple biomarker approach exerts more utilization for patients with different forms of AF than single biomarker use.
心房颤动(AF)与心房重构、心脏功能障碍及不良临床结局相关。体外直流电复律是针对近期发作的AF患者成熟的紧急治疗策略。然而,缺乏准确的预测性血清生物标志物来识别电复律后AF复发的风险。我们回顾了现有数据,并解读了多项研究的结果,这些研究揭示了AF发病机制中关键因素以及影响心脏重构、纤维化、炎症、内皮功能障碍、氧化应激、脂肪组织功能障碍、肌病和线粒体功能障碍的生物标志物。尽管有充分有力的证据表明多种生物标志物(如利钠肽、C反应蛋白、半乳糖凝集素-3、可溶性肿瘤抑制因子-2、成纤维细胞生长因子-23、胶原周转生物标志物、生长分化因子-15)水平升高与AF发生相关,但临床研究获得的数据在预测复律后结局的能力方面似乎存在争议。与传统预测工具相比,需要新型循环生物标志物来阐明这种方法的模式。结论:基于生物标志物的AF治疗后事件预测策略未来需要广泛研究,尤其是在存在不同性别和可变合并症的情况下。或许,多种生物标志物方法比单一生物标志物对不同类型AF患者的应用更广泛。