Aasbø Gunvor, Hansen Bo T, Waller Jo, Nygård Mari, Solbrække Kari N
Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, 0304 Oslo, Norway.
Department of Interdisciplinary Health Science, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 15;11(10):1441. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101441.
Nonattendance for cervical cancer screening is often understood in terms of a lack of 'appropriate' or 'correct' knowledge about the risks and prevention of the disease. Few studies have explored how lay persons-the users themselves-interpret and contextualise scientific knowledge about cervical cancer. In this study, we address the following research question: How is the epidemiology of cervical cancer and its prevention discussed among women who are late for cervical cancer screening in Norway? We completed nine focus group interviews (FGIs) with 41 women who had postponed cervical screening. The analyses were both inductive and explorative, aiming to unpack the complexity of lay understandings of cervical cancer. Interactive associations expressed in the FGIs reflected multiple understandings of aetiology and risk factors, screening, and interpretations of responsibility for acquiring cervical cancer. The term 'candidacy' was employed to provide an enhanced understanding of lay reasoning about the explanations and predictions of cervical cancer, as reflected in the FGIs. Both interpretations of biomedical concepts and cultural values were used to negotiate acceptable and nuanced interpretations of candidacy for cervical cancer. Uncertainties about risk factors for acquiring cervical cancer was an important aspect of such negotiations. The study's findings provide an in-depth understanding of the contexts in which screening may be rendered less relevant or significant for maintaining health. Lay epidemiology should not be considered inappropriate knowledge but rather as a productive component when understanding health behaviours, such as screening attendance.
宫颈癌筛查的未参与往往被理解为缺乏关于该疾病风险和预防的“适当”或“正确”知识。很少有研究探讨非专业人士——使用者自身——如何解读和将关于宫颈癌的科学知识置于具体情境中。在本研究中,我们提出以下研究问题:在挪威宫颈癌筛查延迟的女性中,宫颈癌的流行病学及其预防是如何被讨论的?我们对41名推迟宫颈癌筛查的女性进行了9次焦点小组访谈。分析兼具归纳性和探索性,旨在剖析非专业人士对宫颈癌理解的复杂性。焦点小组访谈中表达的互动关联反映了对病因学、风险因素、筛查以及罹患宫颈癌责任的多种理解。“候选资格”一词被用来加深对焦点小组访谈中所反映的非专业人士对宫颈癌解释和预测的推理的理解。生物医学概念的解释和文化价值观都被用于协商对宫颈癌候选资格可接受且细致入微的解释。罹患宫颈癌风险因素的不确定性是此类协商的一个重要方面。该研究结果深入理解了在哪些情境下筛查对于维持健康可能变得不那么相关或重要。非专业流行病学不应被视为不适当的知识,而应被视为理解诸如筛查参与等健康行为时的一个有益组成部分。