• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Unpacking the Lay Epidemiology of Cervical Cancer: A Focus Group Study on the Perceptions of Cervical Cancer and Its Prevention among Women Late for Screening in Norway.剖析宫颈癌的大众流行病学:一项针对挪威筛查延迟女性对宫颈癌及其预防认知的焦点小组研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 15;11(10):1441. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101441.
2
How social class shapes breast cancer risk perspectives and prevention practices of Australian midlife women: a qualitative study using the concept of 'breast cancer candidacy'.社会阶层如何塑造澳大利亚中年女性的乳腺癌风险认知和预防行为:一项使用“乳腺癌候选”概念的定性研究
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):1295. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13054-3.
3
Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study.挪威宫颈癌筛查不参与者的观点:一项定性焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 30;9(8):e029505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029505.
4
Extending the sociology of candidacy: Bourdieu's relational social class and mid-life women's perceptions of alcohol-related breast cancer risk.拓展候选人社会学:布迪厄的关系社会阶层与中年女性对与酒精相关的乳腺癌风险的认知。
Sociol Health Illn. 2023 Sep;45(7):1502-1522. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13644. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
Ambiguous bodies, uncertain diseases: knowledge of cervical cancer in Papua New Guinea.模糊的身体,不确定的疾病:巴布亚新几内亚的宫颈癌知识。
Ethn Health. 2018 Aug;23(6):659-681. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2017.1283393. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
6
Revisiting Candidacy: What Might It Offer Cancer Prevention?重新审视癌症候选人:它能为癌症预防带来什么?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 27;18(19):10157. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910157.
7
Cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Norway- The healthcare providers' perspectives.挪威移民女性的宫颈癌筛查——医疗服务提供者的观点
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Dec;36(4):415-422. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1523986. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
'I got a letter...' a qualitative study of women's reasoning about attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme in urban Sweden.“我收到了一封信……”一项关于瑞典城市女性参与宫颈癌筛查项目原因的定性研究
Psychooncology. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):76-87. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<76::aid-pon496>3.0.co;2-p.
9
Socio-cultural influences on Chinese women's attendance for cervical screening.社会文化因素对中国女性接受宫颈癌筛查的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Apr;46(1):42-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02964.x.
10
Women and health providers' perspectives on male support for cervical cancer screening in Gwanda district, Zimbabwe.津巴布韦甘达区妇女和卫生保健提供者对男性支持宫颈癌筛查的看法。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 12;18(10):e0282931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282931. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Recommendations for a Communication Strategy to Support Informed Decision-Making About Self or Clinician Sampling for Cervical Screening in the UK: Qualitative Study.英国关于支持就自我采样或临床医生采样进行宫颈筛查的明智决策的沟通策略建议:定性研究
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70191. doi: 10.1111/hex.70191.
2
Informed choices for some, but not for others: An exploration of Australian midlife women's participation in mammography screening by social class.对一些人是明智的选择,对另一些人则不然:按社会阶层对澳大利亚中年女性参与乳房X光检查筛查情况的一项探究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241305730. doi: 10.1177/17455057241305730.
3
Why do people choose not to take part in screening? Qualitative interview study of atrial fibrillation screening nonparticipation.为什么人们选择不参与筛查?房颤筛查不参与的定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2216-2227. doi: 10.1111/hex.13819. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.挪威长期未参加宫颈癌筛查人群中 HPV 自我采样:一项实用随机对照试验。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Nov;127(10):1816-1826. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01954-9. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
2
Sociodemographic Correlates of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake: Opportunistic and Catch-Up Vaccination in Norway.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的社会人口学关联因素:挪威的机会性接种和补种
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 12;13(14):3483. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143483.
3
Impact and cost-effectiveness of strategies to accelerate cervical cancer elimination: A model-based analysis.加速宫颈癌消除策略的影响和成本效益:基于模型的分析。
Prev Med. 2021 Mar;144:106276. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106276. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Expanding boundaries in psychiatry: uncertainty in the context of diagnosis-seeking and negotiation.拓展精神病学的边界:寻求诊断与协商背景下的不确定性
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Aug;42 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):69-83. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13044. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
5
Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study.挪威宫颈癌筛查不参与者的观点:一项定性焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 30;9(8):e029505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029505.
6
Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.人群水平影响和 herd 效应:人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种计划引入后的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394(10197):497-509. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30298-3. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
Variation in health beliefs across different types of cervical screening non-participants.不同类型的宫颈筛查未参与者健康信念的差异。
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:204-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
Barriers to cervical cancer screening faced by immigrants: a registry-based study of 1.4 million women in Norway.移民接受宫颈癌筛查的障碍:基于登记的挪威 140 万女性研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(5):873-879. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx093.
9
Public understanding of the purpose of cancer screening: A population-based survey.公众对癌症筛查目的的理解:一项基于人群的调查。
J Med Screen. 2018 Jun;25(2):64-69. doi: 10.1177/0969141317699440. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Ambiguous bodies, uncertain diseases: knowledge of cervical cancer in Papua New Guinea.模糊的身体,不确定的疾病:巴布亚新几内亚的宫颈癌知识。
Ethn Health. 2018 Aug;23(6):659-681. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2017.1283393. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

剖析宫颈癌的大众流行病学:一项针对挪威筛查延迟女性对宫颈癌及其预防认知的焦点小组研究。

Unpacking the Lay Epidemiology of Cervical Cancer: A Focus Group Study on the Perceptions of Cervical Cancer and Its Prevention among Women Late for Screening in Norway.

作者信息

Aasbø Gunvor, Hansen Bo T, Waller Jo, Nygård Mari, Solbrække Kari N

机构信息

Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, 0304 Oslo, Norway.

Department of Interdisciplinary Health Science, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 15;11(10):1441. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101441.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11101441
PMID:37239727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10218218/
Abstract

Nonattendance for cervical cancer screening is often understood in terms of a lack of 'appropriate' or 'correct' knowledge about the risks and prevention of the disease. Few studies have explored how lay persons-the users themselves-interpret and contextualise scientific knowledge about cervical cancer. In this study, we address the following research question: How is the epidemiology of cervical cancer and its prevention discussed among women who are late for cervical cancer screening in Norway? We completed nine focus group interviews (FGIs) with 41 women who had postponed cervical screening. The analyses were both inductive and explorative, aiming to unpack the complexity of lay understandings of cervical cancer. Interactive associations expressed in the FGIs reflected multiple understandings of aetiology and risk factors, screening, and interpretations of responsibility for acquiring cervical cancer. The term 'candidacy' was employed to provide an enhanced understanding of lay reasoning about the explanations and predictions of cervical cancer, as reflected in the FGIs. Both interpretations of biomedical concepts and cultural values were used to negotiate acceptable and nuanced interpretations of candidacy for cervical cancer. Uncertainties about risk factors for acquiring cervical cancer was an important aspect of such negotiations. The study's findings provide an in-depth understanding of the contexts in which screening may be rendered less relevant or significant for maintaining health. Lay epidemiology should not be considered inappropriate knowledge but rather as a productive component when understanding health behaviours, such as screening attendance.

摘要

宫颈癌筛查的未参与往往被理解为缺乏关于该疾病风险和预防的“适当”或“正确”知识。很少有研究探讨非专业人士——使用者自身——如何解读和将关于宫颈癌的科学知识置于具体情境中。在本研究中,我们提出以下研究问题:在挪威宫颈癌筛查延迟的女性中,宫颈癌的流行病学及其预防是如何被讨论的?我们对41名推迟宫颈癌筛查的女性进行了9次焦点小组访谈。分析兼具归纳性和探索性,旨在剖析非专业人士对宫颈癌理解的复杂性。焦点小组访谈中表达的互动关联反映了对病因学、风险因素、筛查以及罹患宫颈癌责任的多种理解。“候选资格”一词被用来加深对焦点小组访谈中所反映的非专业人士对宫颈癌解释和预测的推理的理解。生物医学概念的解释和文化价值观都被用于协商对宫颈癌候选资格可接受且细致入微的解释。罹患宫颈癌风险因素的不确定性是此类协商的一个重要方面。该研究结果深入理解了在哪些情境下筛查对于维持健康可能变得不那么相关或重要。非专业流行病学不应被视为不适当的知识,而应被视为理解诸如筛查参与等健康行为时的一个有益组成部分。